eRepublik UK

Off-topic => Off Topic Central => Topic started by: Tortea on February 23, 2010, 04:29:20 pm

Title: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 23, 2010, 04:29:20 pm
Simplez.



I shall win.......... :twisted:  :twisted:


Tortea
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on February 23, 2010, 04:30:54 pm
Spam threads are awesome.

I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Asher Di Immortales on February 23, 2010, 04:31:33 pm
I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 23, 2010, 04:56:55 pm
NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....I winz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 23, 2010, 05:00:48 pm
me is the winrar
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 23, 2010, 05:14:54 pm
I wins.....Prayz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on February 23, 2010, 05:16:26 pm
Prayz in vain.

I winz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: GGRyan on February 23, 2010, 06:23:07 pm
DONT POST! Tortea just wants another 20+ page thread!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 23, 2010, 06:31:01 pm
So lock it then, I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 23, 2010, 06:35:27 pm
(http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/6489/locked27xr.jpg)

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 23, 2010, 06:37:26 pm
I win :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 23, 2010, 06:42:56 pm
NO NO NO....I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 23, 2010, 06:44:43 pm
Nuh uh, me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Asher Di Immortales on February 23, 2010, 07:07:23 pm
I could lock it..
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 23, 2010, 07:26:39 pm
Mine.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 23, 2010, 07:28:02 pm
awesomness fails.


I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on February 23, 2010, 07:40:14 pm
in your dreams
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 23, 2010, 07:41:10 pm
doesn't this mean I win?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 23, 2010, 08:02:52 pm
No because I'm posting now so I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 23, 2010, 08:23:27 pm
Quote from: "Steve Steinbeck"
No because I'm posting now so I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 23, 2010, 09:44:19 pm
Quote from: "Skillz88"
Quote from: "Steve Steinbeck"
No because I'm posting now so I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 23, 2010, 09:45:55 pm
Quote from: "Tortea"
Quote from: "Skillz88"
Quote from: "Steve Steinbeck"
No because I'm posting now so I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 23, 2010, 09:53:04 pm
I'm not gonna quote myself so yeh...I WIN
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on February 23, 2010, 10:19:35 pm
Wtf? This is dumb crap. Nobody will ever win (there will always be a next post retards). Trust me, I've tried this before, and wasted 4 hours of my life.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 23, 2010, 10:21:26 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Wtf? This is dumb crap. Nobody will ever win (there will always be a next post retards). Trust me, I've tried this before, and wasted 4 hours of my life.
troll  :roll:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 23, 2010, 10:23:22 pm
It was a cunning ploy to get us all to stop posting so he could win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 24, 2010, 12:44:25 am
I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on February 24, 2010, 11:44:28 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Wtf? This is dumb crap. Nobody will ever win (there will always be a next post retards). Trust me, I've tried this before, and wasted 4 hours of my life.

WHAT!

NO, THAT CANNOT BE TRUE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 24, 2010, 03:59:54 pm
because at the end of this i will become an admin....and win. To prove my awesomeness,so i win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on February 24, 2010, 04:37:07 pm
I didn't think they let incompetent buffoons be admins.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 24, 2010, 06:09:16 pm
They let him take care of Region Wars. When it was still here.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on February 24, 2010, 07:03:37 pm
True, and just look what happened to it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 24, 2010, 07:13:32 pm
I know. Wales was winning so the closed it down.



Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on February 24, 2010, 07:21:57 pm
I remember it being slightly different...

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 24, 2010, 08:24:31 pm
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 24, 2010, 08:42:06 pm
Well South East was doing well when I just joined the forums  ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on February 24, 2010, 08:53:41 pm
Maybe, but they suck now so who cares.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 24, 2010, 11:02:29 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 24, 2010, 11:03:21 pm
It got restarted and Wales had won all of it's five battles but no one else was playing so it was paused.

Also, I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 24, 2010, 11:06:50 pm
Wales was just too good.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 25, 2010, 12:19:57 am
East Midlands exists...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 25, 2010, 01:59:45 am
If we had kept playing with would've been East Midlands vs Wales. And some Scottish interference. I was kind of excited, but whatever.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 25, 2010, 02:09:42 am
700th post PARTY TIME! o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 25, 2010, 06:51:04 am
602nd POST PARTY TIME!!!!!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 25, 2010, 09:15:05 am
1265 post awesome party time
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on February 25, 2010, 09:18:28 am
6214th POST!

Suck it bitches  8-)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 25, 2010, 09:21:21 am
1270, you can suck that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 25, 2010, 03:49:49 pm
........I win, Cause my posts are more worthy than urs
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 25, 2010, 06:05:13 pm
I win, and then some.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 25, 2010, 07:55:48 pm
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 25, 2010, 08:08:57 pm
No... just no.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 25, 2010, 08:28:42 pm
ye but yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 25, 2010, 08:39:32 pm
Wait? What? Shit...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 25, 2010, 11:05:46 pm
Huh, When, Why...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 25, 2010, 11:55:42 pm
dasgssfg
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 25, 2010, 11:58:14 pm
What has this world come to?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 26, 2010, 12:51:08 am
It's all gone to shit.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 26, 2010, 02:52:00 am
because of you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 26, 2010, 07:41:53 am
Because of us.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 26, 2010, 07:59:09 am
We let our guard down
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 26, 2010, 10:44:32 am
And every one died.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on February 26, 2010, 03:51:13 pm
I winz, innit.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 26, 2010, 03:56:49 pm
No you died.

I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 26, 2010, 05:14:28 pm
We all died. But I won.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 26, 2010, 05:18:57 pm
I am the last survivor.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 26, 2010, 05:51:44 pm
Except you have no face, because it's the apocalyptic future.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 26, 2010, 09:20:44 pm
I win because I am chuck norris
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jeroxy on February 26, 2010, 09:54:50 pm
win win win win win, ?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 26, 2010, 10:26:48 pm
spam spam spam spam spam

I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: GGRyan on February 26, 2010, 10:27:59 pm
No you dont Steinbeck.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 26, 2010, 10:50:13 pm
cause i win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 27, 2010, 12:49:03 am
then I take over.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 27, 2010, 03:54:26 am
But it's still me who has posted last.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 27, 2010, 04:00:48 am
but for a very short time
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 27, 2010, 06:13:44 am
All things must pass.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 27, 2010, 07:18:52 am
but not me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Stefan1992 on February 27, 2010, 07:36:04 am
It's my destiny to be winning at this moment in time. But time is irrelevant, so in theory I can win whenever I want.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: John Thunscorpe on February 27, 2010, 08:05:18 am
Quote from: "Stefan1992"
It's my destiny to be winning at this moment in time. But time is irrelevant, so in theory I can win whenever I want.
That is very true, but it's the exact same for me.
So yea. I'm winning for THIS moment in time  :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 27, 2010, 08:38:31 am
then Iz winz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 27, 2010, 10:49:59 am
but then i win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 27, 2010, 11:36:30 am
And now I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on February 27, 2010, 03:03:38 pm
Quote from: "Steve Steinbeck"
And now I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: The B on February 27, 2010, 03:41:27 pm
(http://img.moronail.net/img/5/6/1156.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on February 27, 2010, 03:43:00 pm
NEVAR!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 27, 2010, 04:00:07 pm
Since when did we take orders from BEP?

I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 27, 2010, 05:08:52 pm
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: The B on February 27, 2010, 05:11:48 pm
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 27, 2010, 05:36:02 pm
jdghckdfhjdgj
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 27, 2010, 06:01:20 pm
no me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on February 27, 2010, 06:41:29 pm
no y-

oshi
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 27, 2010, 06:45:19 pm
win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on February 27, 2010, 07:37:25 pm
/me cheats:

A spectre is haunting Europe - the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies.

 Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?

 Two things result from this fact:

 I.  Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be itself a power.
 II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Communism with a manifesto of the party itself.

 To this end, Communists of various nationalities have assembled in London and sketched the following manifesto, to be published in the English, French, German, Italian, Flemish and Danish languages.















Bourgeois and Proletarians1

 The history of all hitherto existing society2 is the history of class struggles.

 Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master3 and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.

 In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.

 The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.

 Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other - Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.

 From the serfs of the Middle Ages sprang the chartered burghers of the earliest towns. From these burgesses the first elements of the bourgeoisie were developed.

 The discovery of America, the rounding of the Cape, opened up fresh ground for the rising bourgeoisie. The East-Indian and Chinese markets, the colonisation of America, trade with the colonies, the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities generally, gave to commerce, to navigation, to industry, an impulse never before known, and thereby, to the revolutionary element in the tottering feudal society, a rapid development.

 The feudal system of industry, in which industrial production was monopolised by closed guilds, now no longer sufficed for the growing wants of the new markets. The manufacturing system took its place. The guild-masters were pushed on one side by the manufacturing middle class; division of labour between the different corporate guilds vanished in the face of division of labour in each single workshop.

 Meantime the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever rising. Even manufacturer no longer sufficed. Thereupon, steam and machinery revolutionised industrial production. The place of manufacture was taken by the giant, Modern Industry; the place of the industrial middle class by industrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial armies, the modern bourgeois.

 Modern industry has established the world market, for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in its turn, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.

 We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange.

 Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class. An oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility, an armed and self-governing association in the medieval commune4: here independent urban republic (as in Italy and Germany); there taxable "third estate" of the monarchy (as in France); afterwards, in the period of manufacturing proper, serving either the semi-feudal or the absolute monarchy as a counterpoise against the nobility, and, in fact, cornerstone of the great monarchies in general, the bourgeoisie has at last, since the establishment of Modern Industry and of the world market, conquered for itself, in the modern representative State, exclusive political sway. The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.

 The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part.

 The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his "natural superiors", and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous "cash payment". It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom - Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.

 The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers.

 The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation.

 The bourgeoisie has disclosed how it came to pass that the brutal display of vigour in the Middle Ages, which reactionaries so much admire, found its fitting complement in the most slothful indolence. It has been the first to show what man's activity can bring about. It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian pyramids, Roman aqueducts, and Gothic cathedrals; it has conducted expeditions that put in the shade all former Exoduses of nations and crusades.

 The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionising the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionising of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his, real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind.

 The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe. It must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere, establish connexions everywhere.

 The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of Reactionists, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. They are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilised nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature.

 The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian, nations into civilisation. The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which it batters down all Chinese walls, with which it forces the barbarians' intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilisation into their midst, i.e., to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image.

 The bourgeoisie has subjected the country to the rule of the towns. It has created enormous cities, has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural, and has thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life. Just as it has made the country dependent on the towns, so it has made barbarian and semi-barbarian countries dependent on the civilised ones, nations of peasants on nations of bourgeois, the East on the West.

 The bourgeoisie keeps more and more doing away with the scattered state of the population, of the means of production, and of property. It has agglomerated population, centralised the means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands. The necessary consequence of this was political centralisation. Independent, or but loosely connected provinces, with separate interests, laws, governments, and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national class-interest, one frontier, and one customs-tariff.

 The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjection of Nature's forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam-navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalisation or rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground - what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labour?

 We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged, the feudal organisation of agriculture and manufacturing industry, in one word, the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder.

 Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class.

 A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells. For many a decade past the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production, against the property relations that are the conditions for the existence of the bourgeois and of its rule. It is enough to mention the commercial crises that by their periodical return put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial, each time more threateningly. In these crises, a great part not only of the existing products, but also of the previously created productive forces, are periodically destroyed. In these crises, there breaks out an epidemic that, in all earlier epochs, would have seemed an absurdity - the epidemic of over-production. Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism; it appears as if a famine, a universal war of devastation, had cut off the supply of every means of subsistence; industry and commerce seem to be destroyed; and why? Because there is too much civilisation, too much means of subsistence, too much industry, too much commerce. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring disorder into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. The conditions of bourgeois society are too narrow to comprise the wealth created by them. And how does the bourgeoisie get over these crises? On the one hand by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces; on the other, by the conquest of new markets, and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones. That is to say, by paving the way for more extensive and more destructive crises, and by diminishing the means whereby crises are prevented.

 The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself.

 But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons - the modern working class - the proletarians.

 In proportion as the bourgeoisie, i.e., capital, is developed, in the same proportion is the proletariat, the modern working class, developed - a class of labourers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital. These labourers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce, and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition, to all the fluctuations of the market.

 Owing to the extensive use of machinery, and to the division of labour, the work of the proletarians has lost all individual character, and, consequently, all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine, and it is only the most simple, most monotonous, and most easily acquired knack, that is required of him. Hence, the cost of production of a workman is restricted, almost entirely, to the means of subsistence that he requires for maintenance, and for the propagation of his race. But the price of a commodity, and therefore also of labour, is equal to its cost of production. In proportion, therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases. Nay more, in proportion as the use of machinery and division of labour increases, in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases, whether by prolongation of the working hours, by the increase of the work exacted in a given time or by increased speed of machinery, etc.

 Modern Industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist. Masses of labourers, crowded into the factory, are organised like soldiers. As privates of the industrial army they are placed under the command of a perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants. Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself. The more openly this despotism proclaims gain to be its end and aim, the more petty, the more hateful and the more embittering it is.

 The less the skill and exertion of strength implied in manual labour, in other words, the more modern industry becomes developed, the more is the labour of men superseded by that of women. Differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class. All are instruments of labour, more or less expensive to use, according to their age and sex.

 No sooner is the exploitation of the labourer by the manufacturer, so far, at an end, that he receives his wages in cash, than he is set upon by the other portions of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc.

 The lower strata of the middle class - the small tradespeople, shopkeepers, and retired tradesmen generally, the handicraftsmen and peasants - all these sink gradually into the proletariat, partly because their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on, and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists, partly because their specialised skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production. Thus the proletariat is recruited from all classes of the population.

 The proletariat goes through various stages of development. With its birth begins its struggle with the bourgeoisie. At first the contest is carried on by individual labourers, then by the workpeople of a factory, then by the operative of one trade, in one locality, against the individual bourgeois who directly exploits them. They direct their attacks not against the bourgeois conditions of production, but against the instruments of production themselves; they destroy imported wares that compete with their labour, they smash to pieces machinery, they set factories ablaze, they seek to restore by force the vanished status of the workman of the Middle Ages.

 At this stage, the labourers still form an incoherent mass scattered over the whole country, and broken up by their mutual competition. If anywhere they unite to form more compact bodies, this is not yet the consequence of their own active union, but of the union of the bourgeoisie, which class, in order to attain its own political ends, is compelled to set the whole proletariat in motion, and is moreover yet, for a time, able to do so. At this stage, therefore, the proletarians do not fight their enemies, but the enemies of their enemies, the remnants of absolute monarchy, the landowners, the non-industrial bourgeois, the petty bourgeois. Thus, the whole historical movement is concentrated in the hands of the bourgeoisie; every victory so obtained is a victory for the bourgeoisie.

 But with the development of industry, the proletariat not only increases in number; it becomes concentrated in greater masses, its strength grows, and it feels that strength more. The various interests and conditions of life within the ranks of the proletariat are more and more equalised, in proportion as machinery obliterates all distinctions of labour, and nearly everywhere reduces wages to the same low level. The growing competition among the bourgeois, and the resulting commercial crises, make the wages of the workers ever more fluctuating. The increasing improvement of machinery, ever more rapidly developing, makes their livelihood more and more precarious; the collisions between individual workmen and individual bourgeois take more and more the character of collisions between two classes. Thereupon, the workers begin to form combinations (Trades' Unions) against the bourgeois; they club together in order to keep up the rate of wages; they found permanent associations in order to make provision beforehand for these occasional revolts. Here and there, the contest breaks out into riots.

 Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time. The real fruit of their battles lies, not in the immediate result, but in the ever expanding union of the workers. This union is helped on by the improved means of communication that are created by modern industry, and that place the workers of different localities in contact with one another. It was just this contact that was needed to centralise the numerous local struggles, all of the same character, into one national struggle between classes. But every class struggle is a political struggle. And that union, to attain which the burghers of the Middle Ages, with their miserable highways, required centuries, the modern proletarian, thanks to railways, achieve in a few years.

 This organisation of the proletarians into a class, and, consequently into a political party, is continually being upset again by the competition between the workers themselves. But it ever rises up again, stronger, firmer, mightier. It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers, by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself. Thus, the ten-hours' bill in England was carried.

 Altogether collisions between the classes of the old society further, in many ways, the course of development of the proletariat. The bourgeoisie finds itself involved in a constant battle. At first with the aristocracy; later on, with those portions of the bourgeoisie itself, whose interests have become antagonistic to the progress of industry; at all time with the bourgeoisie of foreign countries. In all these battles, it sees itself compelled to appeal to the proletariat, to ask for help, and thus, to drag it into the political arena. The bourgeoisie itself, therefore, supplies the proletariat with its own elements of political and general education, in other words, it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie.

 Further, as we have already seen, entire sections of the ruling class are, by the advance of industry, precipitated into the proletariat, or are at least threatened in their conditions of existence. These also supply the proletariat with fresh elements of enlightenment and progress.

 Finally, in times when the class struggle nears the decisive hour, the progress of dissolution going on within the ruling class, in fact within the whole range of old society, assumes such a violent, glaring character, that a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift, and joins the revolutionary class, the class that holds the future in its hands. Just as, therefore, at an earlier period, a section of the nobility went over to the bourgeoisie, so now a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeois ideologists, who have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the historical movement as a whole.

 Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product.

 The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan, the peasant, all these fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class. They are therefore not revolutionary, but conservative. Nay more, they are reactionary, for they try to roll back the wheel of history. If by chance, they are revolutionary, they are only so in view of their impending transfer into the proletariat; they thus defend not their present, but their future interests, they desert their own standpoint to place themselves at that of the proletariat.

 The "dangerous class", [lumpenproletariat] the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of the old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution; its conditions of life, however, prepare it far more for the part of a bribed tool of reactionary intrigue.

 In the condition of the proletariat, those of old society at large are already virtually swamped. The proletarian is without property; his relation to his wife and children has no longer anything in common with the bourgeois family relations; modern industry labour, modern subjection to capital, the same in England as in France, in America as in Germany, has stripped him of every trace of national character. Law, morality, religion, are to him so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests.

 All the preceding classes that got the upper hand sought to fortify their already acquired status by subjecting society at large to their conditions of appropriation. The proletarians cannot become masters of the productive forces of society, except by abolishing their own previous mode of appropriation, and thereby also every other previous mode of appropriation. They have nothing of their own to secure and to fortify; their mission is to destroy all previous securities for, and insurances of, individual property.

 All previous historical movements were movements of minorities, or in the interest of minorities. The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority. The proletariat, the lowest stratum of our present society, cannot stir, cannot raise itself up, without the whole superincumbent strata of official society being sprung into the air.

 Though not in substance, yet in form, the struggle of the proletariat with the bourgeoisie is at first a national struggle. The proletariat of each country must, of course, first of all settle matters with its own bourgeoisie.

 In depicting the most general phases of the development of the proletariat, we traced the more or less veiled civil war, raging within existing society, up to the point where that war breaks out into open revolution, and where the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie lays the foundation for the sway of the proletariat.

 Hitherto, every form of society has been based, as we have already seen, on the antagonism of oppressing and oppressed classes. But in order to oppress a class, certain conditions must be assured to it under which it can, at least, continue its slavish existence. The serf, in the period of serfdom, raised himself to membership in the commune, just as the petty bourgeois, under the yoke of the feudal absolutism, managed to develop into a bourgeois. The modern labourer, on the contrary, instead of rising with the process of industry, sinks deeper and deeper below the conditions of existence of his own class. He becomes a pauper, and pauperism develops more rapidly than population and wealth. And here it becomes evident, that the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society, and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an over-riding law. It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state, that it has to feed him, instead of being fed by him. Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society.

 The essential conditions for the existence and for the sway of the bourgeois class is the formation and augmentation of capital; the condition for capital is wage-labour. Wage-labour rests exclusively on competition between the labourers. The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, replaces the isolation of the labourers, due to competition, by the revolutionary combination, due to association. The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.





Proletarians and Communists


    In what relation do the Communists stand to the proletarians as a whole? The Communists do not form a separate party opposed to the other working-class parties.

    They have no interests separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole.

    They do not set up any sectarian principles of their own, by which to shape and mould the proletarian movement.

    The Communists are distinguished from the other working-class parties by this only:

(1) In the national struggles of the proletarians of the different countries, they point out and bring to the front the common interests of the entire proletariat, independently of all nationality.

(2) In the various stages of development which the struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie has to pass through, they always and everywhere represent the interests of the movement as a whole.

    The Communists, therefore, are on the one hand, practically, the most advanced and resolute section of the working-class parties of every country, that section which pushes forward all others; on the other hand, theoretically, they have over the great mass of the proletariat the advantage of clearly understanding the lines of march, the conditions, and the ultimate general results of the proletarian movement.

    The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat.

    The theoretical conclusions of the Communists are in no way based on ideas or principles that have been invented, or discovered, by this or that would-be universal reformer.

    They merely express, in general terms, actual relations springing from an existing class struggle, from a historical movement going on under our very eyes. The abolition of existing property relations is not at all a distinctive feature of communism.

    All property relations in the past have continually been subject to historical change consequent upon the change in historical conditions.

    The French Revolution, for example, abolished feudal property in favour of bourgeois property.

    The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few.

    In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.

    We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man's own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.

    Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.

    Or do you mean the modern bourgeois private property?

    But does wage-labour create any property for the labourer? Not a bit. It creates capital, i.e., that kind of property which exploits wage-labour, and which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new supply of wage-labour for fresh exploitation. Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour. Let us examine both sides of this antagonism.

    To be a capitalist, is to have not only a purely personal, but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members, nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion.

    Capital is therefore not only personal; it is a social power.

    When, therefore, capital is converted into common property, into the property of all members of society, personal property is not thereby transformed into social property. It is only the social character of the property that is changed. It loses its class character.

    Let us now take wage-labour.

    The average price of wage-labour is the minimum wage, i.e., that quantum of the means of subsistence which is absolutely requisite to keep the labourer in bare existence as a labourer. What, therefore, the wage-labourer appropriates by means of his labour, merely suffices to prolong and reproduce a bare existence. We by no means intend to abolish this personal appropriation of the products of labour, an appropriation that is made for the maintenance and reproduction of human life, and that leaves no surplus wherewith to command the labour of others. All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.

    In bourgeois society, living labour is but a means to increase accumulated labour. In Communist society, accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.

    In bourgeois society, therefore, the past dominates the present; in Communist society, the present dominates the past. In bourgeois society capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality.

    And the abolition of this state of things is called by the bourgeois, abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of bourgeois individuality, bourgeois independence, and bourgeois freedom is undoubtedly aimed at.

    By freedom is meant, under the present bourgeois conditions of production, free trade, free selling and buying.

    But if selling and buying disappears, free selling and buying disappears also. This talk about free selling and buying, and all the other "brave words" of our bourgeois about freedom in general, have a meaning, if any, only in contrast with restricted selling and buying, with the fettered traders of the Middle Ages, but have no meaning when opposed to the Communistic abolition of buying and selling, of the bourgeois conditions of production, and of the bourgeoisie itself.

    You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.

    In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.

    From the moment when labour can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent, into a social power capable of being monopolised, i.e., from the moment when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeois property, into capital, from that moment, you say, individuality vanishes.

    You must, therefore, confess that by "individual" you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible.

    Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

    It has been objected that upon the abolition of private property, all work will cease, and universal laziness will overtake us.

    According to this, bourgeois society ought long ago to have gone to the dogs through sheer idleness; for those those of its members who work, acquire nothing, and those who acquire anything do not work. The whole of this objection is but another expression of the tautology: that there can no longer be any wage-labour when there is no longer any capital.

    All objections urged against the Communistic mode of producing and appropriating material products, have, in the same way, been urged against the Communistic mode of producing and appropriating intellectual products. Just as, to the bourgeois, the disappearance of class property is the disappearance of production itself, so the disappearance of class culture is to him identical with the disappearance of all culture.

    That culture, the loss of which he laments, is, for the enormous majority, a mere training to act as a machine.

    But don't wrangle with us so long as you apply, to our intended abolition of bourgeois property, the standard of your bourgeois notions of freedom, culture, law, &c. Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class made into a law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economical conditions of existence of your class.

    The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms springing from your present mode of production and form of property - historical relations that rise and disappear in the progress of production - this misconception you share with every ruling class that has preceded you. What you see clearly in the case of ancient property, what you admit in the case of feudal property, you are of course forbidden to admit in the case of your own bourgeois form of property.

    Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

    On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

    The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

    Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

    But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

    And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

    The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

    But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.

    The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

    He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

    For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

    Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives.

    Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.

    The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.

    The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is so far, itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word.

    National differences and antagonism between peoples are daily more and more vanishing, owing to the development of the bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world market, to uniformity in the mode of production and in the conditions of life corresponding thereto.

    The supremacy of the proletariat will cause them to vanish still faster. United action, of the leading civilised countries at least, is one of the first conditions for the emancipation of the proletariat.

    In proportion as the exploitation of one individual by another will also be put an end to, the exploitation of one nation by another will also be put an end to. In proportion as the antagonism between classes within the nation vanishes, the hostility of one nation to another will come to an end.

    The charges against Communism made from a religious, a philosophical and, generally, from an ideological standpoint, are not deserving of serious examination.

    Does it require deep intuition to comprehend that man's ideas, views, and conception, in one word, man's consciousness, changes with every change in the conditions of his material existence, in his social relations and in his social life?

    What else does the history of ideas prove, than that intellectual production changes its character in proportion as material production is changed? The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of its ruling class.

    When people speak of the ideas that revolutionise society, they do but express that fact that within the old society the elements of a new one have been created, and that the dissolution of the old ideas keeps even pace with the dissolution of the old conditions of existence.

    When the ancient world was in its last throes, the ancient religions were overcome by Christianity. When Christian ideas succumbed in the 18th century to rationalist ideas, feudal society fought its death battle with the then revolutionary bourgeoisie. The ideas of religious liberty and freedom of conscience merely gave expression to the sway of free competition within the domain of knowledge.

    "Undoubtedly," it will be said, "religious, moral, philosophical, and juridical ideas have been modified in the course of historical development. But religion, morality, philosophy, political science, and law, constantly survived this change."

    "There are, besides, eternal truths, such as Freedom, Justice, etc., that are common to all states of society. But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience."

    What does this accusation reduce itself to? The history of all past society has consisted in the development of class antagonisms, antagonisms that assumed different forms at different epochs.

    But whatever form they may have taken, one fact is common to all past ages, viz., the exploitation of one part of society by the other. No wonder, then, that the social consciousness of past ages, despite all the multiplicity and variety it displays, moves within certain common forms, or general ideas, which cannot completely vanish except with the total disappearance of class antagonisms.

    The Communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional relations; no wonder that its development involved the most radical rupture with traditional ideas.

    But let us have done with the bourgeois objections to Communism.

    We have seen above, that the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy.

    The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organised as the ruling class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible.

    Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.

    These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.

















    Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable:

    1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
    2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
    3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
    4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
    5. Centralisation of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
    6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
    7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
    8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
    9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
    10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.

    When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organised power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organise itself as a class, if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.

    In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.


Socialist and Communist Literature


1. Reactionary Socialism

A. Feudal Socialism

Owing to their historical position, it became the vocation of the aristocracies of France and England to write pamphlets against modern bourgeois society. In the French Revolution of July 1830, and in the English reform agitation[A], these aristocracies again succumbed to the hateful upstart. Thenceforth, a serious political struggle was altogether out of the question. A literary battle alone remained possible. But even in the domain of literature the old cries of the restoration period had become impossible.5

In order to arouse sympathy, the aristocracy was obliged to lose sight, apparently, of its own interests, and to formulate their indictment against the bourgeoisie in the interest of the exploited working class alone. Thus, the aristocracy took their revenge by singing lampoons on their new masters and whispering in his ears sinister prophesies of coming catastrophe.

In this way arose feudal Socialism: half lamentation, half lampoon; half an echo of the past, half menace of the future; at times, by its bitter, witty and incisive criticism, striking the bourgeoisie to the very heart's core; but always ludicrous in its effect, through total incapacity to comprehend the march of modern history.

The aristocracy, in order to rally the people to them, waved the proletarian alms-bag in front for a banner. But the people, so often as it joined them, saw on their hindquarters the old feudal coats of arms, and deserted with loud and irreverent laughter.

One section of the French Legitimists and "Young England" exhibited this spectacle.

In pointing out that their mode of exploitation was different to that of the bourgeoisie, the feudalists forget that they exploited under circumstances and conditions that were quite different and that are now antiquated. In showing that, under their rule, the modern proletariat never existed, they forget that the modern bourgeoisie is the necessary offspring of their own form of society.

For the rest, so little do they conceal the reactionary character of their criticism that their chief accusation against the bourgeois amounts to this, that under the bourgeois rŽgime a class is being developed which is destined to cut up root and branch the old order of society.

What they upbraid the bourgeoisie with is not so much that it creates a proletariat as that it creates a revolutionary proletariat.

In political practice, therefore, they join in all coercive measures against the working class; and in ordinary life, despite their high-falutin phrases, they stoop to pick up the golden apples dropped from the tree of industry, and to barter truth, love, and honour, for traffic in wool, beetroot-sugar, and potato spirits.6

As the parson has ever gone hand in hand with the landlord, so has Clerical Socialism with Feudal Socialism.

Nothing is easier than to give Christian asceticism a Socialist tinge. Has not Christianity declaimed against private property, against marriage, against the State? Has it not preached in the place of these, charity and poverty, celibacy and mortification of the flesh, monastic life and Mother Church? Christian Socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat.

B. Petty-Bourgeois Socialism

The feudal aristocracy was not the only class that was ruined by the bourgeoisie, not the only class whose conditions of existence pined and perished in the atmosphere of modern bourgeois society. The medieval burgesses and the small peasant proprietors were the precursors of the modern bourgeoisie. In those countries which are but little developed, industrially and commercially, these two classes still vegetate side by side with the rising bourgeoisie.

In countries where modern civilisation has become fully developed, a new class of petty bourgeois has been formed, fluctuating between proletariat and bourgeoisie, and ever renewing itself as a supplementary part of bourgeois society. The individual members of this class, however, are being constantly hurled down into the proletariat by the action of competition, and, as modern industry develops, they even see the moment approaching when they will completely disappear as an independent section of modern society, to be replaced in manufactures, agriculture and commerce, by overlookers, bailiffs and shopmen.

In countries like France, where the peasants constitute far more than half of the population, it was natural that writers who sided with the proletariat against the bourgeoisie should use, in their criticism of the bourgeois rŽgime, the standard of the peasant and petty bourgeois, and from the standpoint of these intermediate classes, should take up the cudgels for the working class. Thus arose petty-bourgeois Socialism. Sismondi was the head of this school, not only in France but also in England.

This school of Socialism dissected with great acuteness the contradictions in the conditions of modern production. It laid bare the hypocritical apologies of economists. It proved, incontrovertibly, the disastrous effects of machinery and division of labour; the concentration of capital and land in a few hands; overproduction and crises; it pointed out the inevitable ruin of the petty bourgeois and peasant, the misery of the proletariat, the anarchy in production, the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth, the industrial war of extermination between nations, the dissolution of old moral bonds, of the old family relations, of the old nationalities.

In its positive aims, however, this form of Socialism aspires either to restoring the old means of production and of exchange, and with them the old property relations, and the old society, or to cramping the modern means of production and of exchange within the framework of the old property relations that have been, and were bound to be, exploded by those means. In either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian.

Its last words are: corporate guilds for manufacture; patriarchal relations in agriculture.

Ultimately, when stubborn historical facts had dispersed all intoxicating effects of self-deception, this form of Socialism ended in a miserable hangover.

C. German or "True" Socialism

The Socialist and Communist literature of France, a literature that originated under the pressure of a bourgeoisie in power, and that was the expressions of the struggle against this power, was introduced into Germany at a time when the bourgeoisie, in that country, had just begun its contest with feudal absolutism.

German philosophers, would-be philosophers, and beaux esprits (men of letters), eagerly seized on this literature, only forgetting, that when these writings immigrated from France into Germany, French social conditions had not immigrated along with them. In contact with German social conditions, this French literature lost all its immediate practical significance and assumed a purely literary aspect. Thus, to the German philosophers of the Eighteenth Century, the demands of the first French Revolution were nothing more than the demands of "Practical Reason" in general, and the utterance of the will of the revolutionary French bourgeoisie signified, in their eyes, the laws of pure Will, of Will as it was bound to be, of true human Will generally.

The work of the German literati consisted solely in bringing the new French ideas into harmony with their ancient philosophical conscience, or rather, in annexing the French ideas without deserting their own philosophic point of view.

This annexation took place in the same way in which a foreign language is appropriated, namely, by translation.

It is well known how the monks wrote silly lives of Catholic Saints over the manuscripts on which the classical works of ancient heathendom had been written. The German literati reversed this process with the profane French literature. They wrote their philosophical nonsense beneath the French original. For instance, beneath the French criticism of the economic functions of money, they wrote "Alienation of Humanity", and beneath the French criticism of the bourgeois state they wrote "Dethronement of the Category of the General", and so forth.

The introduction of these philosophical phrases at the back of the French historical criticisms, they dubbed "Philosophy of Action", "True Socialism", "German Science of Socialism", "Philosophical Foundation of Socialism", and so on.

The French Socialist and Communist literature was thus completely emasculated. And, since it ceased in the hands of the German to express the struggle of one class with the other, he felt conscious of having overcome "French one-sidedness" and of representing, not true requirements, but the requirements of Truth; not the interests of the proletariat, but the interests of Human Nature, of Man in general, who belongs to no class, has no reality, who exists only in the misty realm of philosophical fantasy.

This German socialism, which took its schoolboy task so seriously and solemnly, and extolled its poor stock-in-trade in such a mountebank fashion, meanwhile gradually lost its pedantic innocence.

The fight of the Germans, and especially of the Prussian bourgeoisie, against feudal aristocracy and absolute monarchy, in other words, the liberal movement, became more earnest.

By this, the long-wished for opportunity was offered to "True" Socialism of confronting the political movement with the Socialist demands, of hurling the traditional anathemas against liberalism, against representative government, against bourgeois competition, bourgeois freedom of the press, bourgeois legislation, bourgeois liberty and equality, and of preaching to the masses that they had nothing to gain, and everything to lose, by this bourgeois movement. German Socialism forgot, in the nick of time, that the French criticism, whose silly echo it was, presupposed the existence of modern bourgeois society, with its corresponding economic conditions of existence, and the political constitution adapted thereto, the very things those attainment was the object of the pending struggle in Germany.

To the absolute governments, with their following of parsons, professors, country squires, and officials, it served as a welcome scarecrow against the threatening bourgeoisie.

It was a sweet finish, after the bitter pills of flogging and bullets, with which these same governments, just at that time, dosed the German working-class risings.

While this "True" Socialism thus served the government as a weapon for fighting the German bourgeoisie, it, at the same time, directly represented a reactionary interest, the interest of German Philistines. In Germany, the petty-bourgeois class, a relic of the sixteenth century, and since then constantly cropping up again under the various forms, is the real social basis of the existing state of things.

To preserve this class is to preserve the existing state of things in Germany. The industrial and political supremacy of the bourgeoisie threatens it with certain destruction - on the one hand, from the concentration of capital; on the other, from the rise of a revolutionary proletariat. "True" Socialism appeared to kill these two birds with one stone. It spread like an epidemic.

The robe of speculative cobwebs, embroidered with flowers of rhetoric, steeped in the dew of sickly sentiment, this transcendental robe in which the German Socialists wrapped their sorry "eternal truths", all skin and bone, served to wonderfully increase the sale of their goods amongst such a public.

And on its part German Socialism recognised, more and more, its own calling as the bombastic representative of the petty-bourgeois Philistine.

It proclaimed the German nation to be the model nation, and the German petty Philistine to be the typical man. To every villainous meanness of this model man, it gave a hidden, higher, Socialistic interpretation, the exact contrary of its real character. It went to the extreme length of directly opposing the "brutally destructive" tendency of Communism, and of proclaiming its supreme and impartial contempt of all class struggles. With very few exceptions, all the so-called Socialist and Communist publications that now (1847) circulate in Germany belong to the domain of this foul and enervating literature.7

 
2. Conservative or Bourgeois Socialism

A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society.

To this section belong economists, philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organisers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind. This form of socialism has, moreover, been worked out into complete systems.

We may cite Proudhon's Philosophis de la Misre as an example of this form.

The Socialistic bourgeois want all the advantages of modern social conditions without the struggles and dangers necessarily resulting therefrom. They desire the existing state of society, minus its revolutionary and disintegrating elements. They wish for a bourgeoisie without a proletariat. The bourgeoisie naturally conceives the world in which it is supreme to be the best; and bourgeois Socialism develops this comfortable conception into various more or less complete systems. In requiring the proletariat to carry out such a system, and thereby to march straightway into the social New Jerusalem, it but requires in reality, that the proletariat should remain within the bounds of existing society, but should cast away all its hateful ideas concerning the bourgeoisie.

A second, and more practical, but less systematic, form of this Socialism sought to depreciate every revolutionary movement in the eyes of the working class by showing that no mere political reform, but only a change in the material conditions of existence, in economical relations, could be of any advantage to them. By changes in the material conditions of existence, this form of Socialism, however, by no means understands abolition of the bourgeois relations of production, an abolition that can be affected only by a revolution, but administrative reforms, based on the continued existence of these relations; reforms, therefore, that in no respect affect the relations between capital and labour, but, at the best, lessen the cost, and simplify the administrative work, of bourgeois government.

Bourgeois Socialism attains adequate expression when, and only when, it becomes a mere figure of speech.

Free trade: for the benefit of the working class. Protective duties: for the benefit of the working class. Prison Reform: for the benefit of the working class. This is the last word and the only seriously meant word of bourgeois socialism.

It is summed up in the phrase: the bourgeois is a bourgeois - for the benefit of the working class.

 
3. Critical-Utopian Socialism and Communism

We do not here refer to that literature which, in every great modern revolution, has always given voice to the demands of the proletariat, such as the writings of Babeuf and others.

The first direct attempts of the proletariat to attain its own ends, made in times of universal excitement, when feudal society was being overthrown, necessarily failed, owing to the then undeveloped state of the proletariat, as well as to the absence of the economic conditions for its emancipation, conditions that had yet to be produced, and could be produced by the impending bourgeois epoch alone. The revolutionary literature that accompanied these first movements of the proletariat had necessarily a reactionary character. It inculcated universal asceticism and social levelling in its crudest form.

The Socialist and Communist systems, properly so called, those of Saint-Simon, Fourier, Owen, and others, spring into existence in the early undeveloped period, described above, of the struggle between proletariat and bourgeoisie (see Section 1. Bourgeois and Proletarians).

The founders of these systems see, indeed, the class an
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 27, 2010, 07:43:18 pm
tl;dr
and now I'm winning.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 27, 2010, 10:42:13 pm
Quote from: "The B"
(http://img.moronail.net/img/5/6/1156.jpg)


Thats a mac.

Macs are awesome.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on February 27, 2010, 10:47:12 pm
I bought my computer from a co-operative, and I run linux. Your argument fails.  :|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 27, 2010, 10:47:49 pm
Quote from: "Bob the terrorist"
I bought my computer from a co-operative, and I run linux. Your argument fails.  :|


Tesco pwnz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 27, 2010, 10:52:40 pm
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 28, 2010, 12:17:29 am
no i win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 28, 2010, 12:33:58 am
nope
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 28, 2010, 12:35:22 am
yep
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: John Thunscorpe on February 28, 2010, 12:40:10 am
Quote from: "Steve Steinbeck"
Since when did we take orders from BEP?

I win.
:P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 28, 2010, 12:46:16 am
I winz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 28, 2010, 03:32:53 am
When will you all learn? I am the best at this game.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on February 28, 2010, 07:44:36 am
In your dreams
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: GGRyan on February 28, 2010, 09:16:37 am
In his dreams, I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 28, 2010, 12:10:49 pm
no me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 28, 2010, 12:27:10 pm
BOOBz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on February 28, 2010, 12:28:22 pm
Steve haz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on February 28, 2010, 01:53:29 pm
I command you all to acknowledge me as the winner.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on February 28, 2010, 08:30:07 pm
PFFFT
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on February 28, 2010, 08:34:10 pm
I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on February 28, 2010, 09:09:48 pm
Me wins!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on February 28, 2010, 09:41:16 pm
oh no you don't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 01, 2010, 12:47:36 am
OH YEAH!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 01, 2010, 06:29:00 am
I'm winning atm
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 01, 2010, 06:29:25 am
Well I'm winning even harder.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 01, 2010, 06:36:07 am
ya you like it haddont you von...Jk
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 01, 2010, 05:25:45 pm
Wut?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: malta_1990 on March 01, 2010, 05:40:28 pm
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 01, 2010, 06:18:35 pm
Avlana's gonna come get you!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on March 01, 2010, 07:07:53 pm
Quote from: "malta_1990"
FFFFF
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Anacco on March 01, 2010, 08:14:42 pm
y hello thar, chaps
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 01, 2010, 08:38:29 pm
OHAII
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 01, 2010, 08:47:13 pm
flower YOU MALTA!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 01, 2010, 10:13:00 pm
I win!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 01, 2010, 10:16:58 pm
(http://macroblog.typepad.com/macroblog/images/win_button.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 01, 2010, 10:38:01 pm
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Yossarian on March 01, 2010, 10:39:42 pm
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
You lose sir!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 01, 2010, 10:41:10 pm
Due to the Baron's loss

I win!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 02, 2010, 02:01:11 am
Due to my loss, I win again.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 02, 2010, 05:12:27 am
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 02, 2010, 07:47:12 am
Winning is my job
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 02, 2010, 08:07:06 am
Not anymore! I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 02, 2010, 08:19:24 am
I win now
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 02, 2010, 03:00:20 pm
Winrar
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on March 02, 2010, 03:56:17 pm
LOSAR
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on March 02, 2010, 04:24:01 pm
is you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: JosephB on March 02, 2010, 05:15:49 pm
lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 02, 2010, 07:06:50 pm
Hurp durp
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 02, 2010, 08:23:33 pm
rump pump
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 02, 2010, 09:26:55 pm
flump chump
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: John F Baker on March 02, 2010, 10:08:15 pm
wibblywobbly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 02, 2010, 10:39:20 pm
bum
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 02, 2010, 10:40:49 pm
Really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 02, 2010, 10:45:28 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on March 02, 2010, 10:47:05 pm
owned

(to stop the thread becoming a one word thread)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 02, 2010, 10:47:24 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Asher Di Immortales on March 02, 2010, 10:52:32 pm
Quote from: "Skillz88"
owned

(to stop the thread becoming a one word thread)

Your avatar sucks even more  :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 02, 2010, 10:56:00 pm
Quote from: "Asher Di Immortales"
Quote from: "Skillz88"
owned

(to stop the thread becoming a one word thread)

Your avatar sucks even more  :?

It's catching on though D:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 02, 2010, 10:56:03 pm
Quote from: "Asher Di Immortales"
Quote from: "Skillz88"
owned

(to stop the thread becoming a one word thread)

Your avatar sucks even more  :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 02, 2010, 11:04:51 pm
chump the flump
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 12:17:03 am
This AVatar is pretty awesome...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 03, 2010, 12:24:02 am
Not as good as mine...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on March 03, 2010, 12:25:46 am
Meh, the Eddie ones were sooooooooooooooooooooooo much cooler.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 01:30:01 am
But that's in the past.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 03, 2010, 01:37:02 am
I have to agree.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 06:00:04 am
Indeed.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 03, 2010, 07:39:27 am
What are we talking about
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 03, 2010, 10:19:30 am
Everything
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 03, 2010, 10:34:48 am
Oh ok
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 03, 2010, 11:16:41 am
Then all is well
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 07:04:26 pm
I was talking about the importance of bears.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 03, 2010, 07:05:45 pm
VOTE KARACTICUS
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 07:06:13 pm
Vote AV.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 03, 2010, 07:07:24 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
VOTE KARACTICUS
Vs
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
Vote AV.

 :|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 07:23:18 pm
I find that yelling isn't necessary to get the point across.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 03, 2010, 07:28:40 pm
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
I find that yelling isn't necessary to get the point across.
I find you are wrong
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 07:36:52 pm
I find that the day is much better after five o'clock in the afternoon.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on March 03, 2010, 07:54:31 pm
I find that your mother is much  better after five o'clock in the afternoon.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 03, 2010, 08:15:56 pm
Thats just bad....
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 03, 2010, 09:53:20 pm
Sir, there is a rule about my mother. I don't really care, as long as I don't have to hear about it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 03, 2010, 09:56:40 pm
That is the way to live...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 04, 2010, 01:23:47 am
Drive it like you stole it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 04, 2010, 01:24:37 am
Never look back
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 04, 2010, 02:44:05 am
before crossing the street
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Stefan1992 on March 04, 2010, 06:39:37 am
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
I was talking about the importance of beers.

fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 04, 2010, 06:46:10 am
Quote from: "Stefan1992"
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
I was talking about the importance of beers.

fix'd

Yeah, I'll buy that.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 04, 2010, 08:15:00 am
I'll buy some beers
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: howiex on March 04, 2010, 12:02:25 pm
I'm winning hahahahaha
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on March 04, 2010, 04:51:19 pm
hahahahahhahha...NO/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 04, 2010, 04:55:33 pm
I have run some tests...he's not lying.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 04, 2010, 07:19:08 pm
But it's mine now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on March 04, 2010, 08:16:01 pm
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
But it's mine now.

spoke too soon
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 04, 2010, 08:17:12 pm
Did I?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 04, 2010, 08:23:21 pm
CCCCCCCCCCCCCC-COMBO MAKER
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 04, 2010, 08:27:02 pm
(http://www.wesleyjsmith.com/blog/uploaded_images/denied-721524.gif)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 04, 2010, 08:51:47 pm
...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 05, 2010, 05:16:38 am
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 05, 2010, 06:57:39 am
After me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 05, 2010, 07:54:51 am
But where does that leave me?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Othere on March 05, 2010, 07:55:24 am
In the dust.

I win o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 05, 2010, 05:40:06 pm
(http://kinderfresser.org/download/fun/pics/forum/unrelated.jpg)

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 05, 2010, 06:15:57 pm
I feel as though we may never have a winner, but I'm sure as hell going to try.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 05, 2010, 06:45:52 pm
The person who wins will be the admin who locks the thread..
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on March 05, 2010, 10:05:39 pm
or simply me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 05, 2010, 10:16:04 pm
me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 05, 2010, 10:52:48 pm
But alas, it is only I.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 05, 2010, 10:53:59 pm
and me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 05, 2010, 10:54:22 pm
You're fast...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 05, 2010, 11:48:06 pm
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:00:59 am
no, i do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 06, 2010, 12:08:21 am
DAMN YOU JACK I WAS GOING TO POST I WIN CAUSE THIS IS FIRST POST OF THE DAY!!!

I win cause of caps...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:23:11 am
no you don't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:24:54 am
my post was 1st of the day...awesome...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:45:27 am
My post was the last of yesterday though
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:57:18 am
meh, i win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:59:36 am
Not any more
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 01:08:11 am
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 02:20:39 am
yes?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 02:59:40 am
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 03:05:34 am
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 03:41:17 am
NO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 03:46:08 am
YES
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 03:57:16 am
NO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 04:14:07 am
NOT NO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 06, 2010, 04:48:52 am
SHUT UP! BOTH OF YOU!
















Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 05:40:28 am
No, I refuse
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jamesw on March 06, 2010, 06:11:48 am
Do i win yet?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 06:21:14 am
Quote from: "jamesw"
Do i win yet?
Unfortunately not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 07:51:12 am
No I win because I am the new god
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 08:21:53 am
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 10:41:57 am
NO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 11:45:19 am
YES
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 11:51:13 am
NO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 11:54:21 am
YES
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 11:55:38 am
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 11:58:11 am
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:01:18 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:04:49 pm
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:06:48 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:07:33 pm
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:18:44 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:22:06 pm
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:23:15 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:23:30 pm
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:24:33 pm
nope
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:27:05 pm
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:27:51 pm
nokey dokey
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:28:51 pm
Okey dokey
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:29:18 pm
I win...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:30:37 pm
^You lie
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:31:12 pm
No you lie
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:32:05 pm
As of this instant I am not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:32:54 pm
yes you are
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:34:10 pm
But in that moment of time I was winning
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:39:12 pm
but now yo are not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 12:39:37 pm
You are correct
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 12:40:27 pm
I am?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 06, 2010, 04:15:19 pm
msgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgstmsgfhjkbsldhkfc7q364bc984obajkshtkbaythcgst
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 06, 2010, 04:22:32 pm
I told you all earlier, this is not going anywhere
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 06, 2010, 04:41:27 pm
Yes?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lee Richards on March 06, 2010, 04:42:38 pm
No.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 06, 2010, 06:10:04 pm
Kinda sorta maybe.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 06, 2010, 09:02:28 pm
post
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 09:07:48 pm
LA LA LA LA L:A
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 09:44:54 pm
My first post of the day
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 09:50:27 pm
I  win because I have 10x more posts then you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 09:53:22 pm
You actually have over 12 x more posts than I do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 09:56:16 pm
Oh well lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 09:59:51 pm
One day, when I grow up big and strong, I'll catch up  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 06, 2010, 10:33:43 pm
But i'll e far ahead
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 06, 2010, 10:45:37 pm
Less far ahead than you are now (as in you won't have 12 x more posts than me)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 07, 2010, 02:35:57 am
But it really doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 03:14:40 am
It totally does matter
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 07, 2010, 04:12:45 am
Nothing matters.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 04:47:17 am
You don't matter  8-)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 05:19:46 am
I remove everyone's right to post in this thread.  If you post then my cultis- I mean lawyers will see to you with warrants attached to a cricket bat.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 05:43:50 am
Too bad, you do not have the power to remove my right 8-)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 05:50:00 am
My lawyers are on the way.  They have lots of paper with words on them with a handy selection of tools to help you understand.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 05:54:56 am
You know where I live  :shock:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 05:59:08 am
I know where your estranged half sister lives as well.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 06:01:16 am
I don't think I have a half sister  :?

Does mean I have a pretend half sister who knows where I live
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 06:02:06 am
estranged = you don't know they existed.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 06:13:10 am
I thought it meant someone that you didn't talk to/communicate with, meh, my english is pretty bad anyway.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 06:14:21 am
No, that's your mothers twin brother who was used as a surrogate grandfather.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 06:15:44 am
I'm confused now  :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 06:16:41 am
Not as confused as you will get when my lawyers will arrive.  They have massive legal words and if you don't understand they hit you with a hammer which has the word imprinted on it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 06:18:30 am
That's called bullying.

Apparently it's bad
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 06:19:46 am
No, they are lawyers.  That means that it's your fault.  They have to charge you for damaging their hammers.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 06:20:48 am
Well, I'll make them so bored of hitting me that they'll fall asleep then I'll slit their throats and run off to Seth Efrica
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 06:21:22 am
Stop posting and I'll tell them to hug and love you.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 06:22:37 am
I don't want to be "loved" by lawyers
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 06:23:55 am
You win, I give up.  I promised myself I'll never play these games.

You're too damn good, and I want to read about midgets.  http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entri ... phtml#2380 (http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_midget_story.phtml#2380)

You beat me, you win.  Let me get out of the posting battle.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 06:25:09 am
Yay /
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 01:17:29 pm
Pysch!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 07, 2010, 01:40:58 pm
You two are clogging every thread :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 01:54:12 pm
It's now us 2 really.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on March 07, 2010, 02:21:25 pm
Me rocks entertainment. Me should b modz, then meh slauterz u all?

alright?


<balamory.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 02:42:47 pm
I disagree.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 07, 2010, 08:04:55 pm
(http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/contrarian_trollcat.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 07, 2010, 08:44:02 pm
All in favour of Tortilla being a fggt
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 07, 2010, 08:46:07 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
All in favour of Chatzilla being a fggt
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 07, 2010, 08:58:43 pm
Quote from: "anarchist13"
(http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/contrarian_trollcat.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 07, 2010, 09:19:22 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "anarchist13"
(http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/contrarian_trollcat.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 09:49:04 pm
(http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2156/hurrrr.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 07, 2010, 10:12:44 pm
(http://imagemacros.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/shark_derp_durr_hurr.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 07, 2010, 10:14:27 pm
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
(http://imagemacros.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/shark_derp_durr_hurr.jpg)

I lol'd more than I ever have before :p
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 10:16:14 pm
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/5416/hurrvf.jpg
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 07, 2010, 10:47:35 pm
O.K you win or is it me :o
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 07, 2010, 10:53:03 pm
No it's me :D!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 07, 2010, 10:53:55 pm
I beg to differ :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 10:59:04 pm
Not whilst I still have conciousness.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 07, 2010, 11:01:02 pm
Say hello to my friend chloroform :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 11:03:37 pm
Stims, quickly!  And music, and distracting laser beam glitter ball,
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 07, 2010, 11:06:39 pm
Say hello to my friend chainsaw :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 07, 2010, 11:10:09 pm
(http://generationbass.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/tony-montana-scarface-say-hello-to-my-little-friend1.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 11:16:11 pm
What if I were to slowly....




 LEG IT!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 07, 2010, 11:17:18 pm
You can have it the easy way or the hard way.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 07, 2010, 11:18:41 pm
(http://home.comcast.net/~GrandAdmiral1138/1165412949657.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 07, 2010, 11:19:57 pm
NEVER :!:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 07, 2010, 11:41:19 pm
SAY NEVER
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:03:43 am
DO NOT WANT!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:12:02 am
Do not want that bag back baby.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:12:33 am
Touch me baby!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:13:57 am
Set the night on fire!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:15:44 am
In the town where I was born,
Lived a man who sailed to sea,
And he told us of his life,
In the land of submarines,

So we sailed on to the sun,
Till we found the sea green,
And we lived beneath the waves,
In our yellow submarine,

We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine,
We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine.

And our friends are all aboard,
Many more of them live next door,
And the band begins to play.

(Trumpets play)

We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine,
We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine.

(Full speed ahead, Mr. Barkley, full speed ahead!
Full speed over here, sir!
All together! All together!
Aye, aye, sir, fire!
Captain! Captain!)

As we live a life of ease(life of ease)
Every one of us(every one of us) has all we need,(has all we need)
Sky of blue,(sky of blue) and sea green,(sea of green)
In our yellow(In our yellow) submarine.(submarine) ( Haha! )

We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine,
We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine.

(fading)

We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine,
We all live in yellow submarine,
yellow submarine, yellow submarine.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:16:28 am
99 red balloons got popped by my kittens.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:17:01 am
(0 o)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:17:36 am
I kept them in a box for a week, what do you expect?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:18:33 am
Don't keep them in a box then.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:18:59 am
But it's so fun when they go free.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:19:43 am
Set the balloons free.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:20:28 am
Kittens first in a enclosed area.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 12:20:53 am
I've lost my grip on reality
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:21:18 am
Thats your own damn fault.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:21:51 am
So slide into the truth.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 12:22:33 am
AND DIE!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 12:32:32 am
In abstract peace.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 06:48:28 am
Wow, 114 posts in a day
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 07:05:22 am
I gave my promises in my 4th post.  People should know what to expect.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:26:47 am
Can't remember your 4th post, I do remember your 3rd post though
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 07:38:05 am
The first one was the distate about the lack of porn,  the second one announced my first one, my third one was about buttons.  my 4th post was a mighty speech designed to tell everyone that I am a forum poster that can be relied upon to post in the forums.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:44:01 am
Wow you have a good memory, I have no idea what I've posted or said
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 07:46:30 am
I can't remember what I've done in RL, let alone the posts I've made.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 07:47:45 am
Eat less raw chicken.  Guaranteed to solve any memory problems that's causing.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 07:48:38 am
Are you here all the time or something?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 07:49:29 am
N'ah I've got uni in 40 minutes.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:50:34 am
I have like never ate raw chicken before
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 07:51:09 am
It's not too bad if you're really hungry.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:51:46 am
Seriously, what does it taste like (don't say raw chicken)

EDIT: 200th post /
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 07:53:41 am
Very similar to raw human.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:54:10 am
Ewwwwww
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 07:55:23 am
It doesn't have much of a taste until it's been cooked.  you just get slime and you cannot effectively jamesw the meat.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 07:55:55 am
Well raw human tastes similar to raw cat anyway
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:56:36 am
Ughh you've made me detest meat even more than I already do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 07:56:49 am
It's all better after put on a flame for a few minutes.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:57:47 am
you talking about the raw chicken or raw cat?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 07:58:48 am
Never had cat. I was speaking of chicken and human.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 07:59:27 am
I seeeee
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 08:00:41 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
I seeeee

Do you? Do you really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 08:01:29 am
Probably not.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 08:02:22 am
it's a sensation anyway.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 08:02:40 am
Quote from: "anarchist13"
Quote from: "Peejik"
I seeeee

Do you? Do you really?
I do I see the light

Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
Probably not.
I so do  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 08:05:22 am
Post.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 08:06:51 am
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
Post.
:shock: Great post, absolutely riveting stuff.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 08:08:46 am
(http://rpnidev.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/1087039-riveting_tale_chap_super1.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 08:10:16 am
Well, I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 08:40:04 am
You win a bag of scallops without the bag or the scallops.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 08:44:38 am
I do however win though, even if I win nothing
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 08:52:41 am
Congratulations, you've come zero.

That's also why your in place infinity.  Last.  So far back you don't know where the hell anything else.  You're trap in a complex.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:16:20 am
I'm confused
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 09:41:42 am
That's the natural state.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:54:03 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
That's the natural state.
:(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 10:06:47 am
lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 10:38:44 am
Anyway, last post as of this second
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 08, 2010, 01:20:25 pm
You wish.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 05:42:12 pm
Do I?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 05:43:09 pm
Yes you do.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 08:54:06 pm
So do I
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:00:33 pm
Yes you do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:09:24 pm
Yes I do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 09:09:58 pm
Yes do I?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:11:22 pm
So do I
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 09:11:52 pm
Who does I do?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:12:35 pm
Do I? :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 09:13:13 pm
I think we can all agree, blaggard doesn't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:13:51 pm
He absolutely doesn't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:14:30 pm
I agree, i think, do i? :?  :?  :?  :?  :?  :?  :?  :?  :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:15:53 pm
You do agree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 09:20:31 pm
But do the gods?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:21:12 pm
Well one god does :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:21:28 pm
There are no gods
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:22:19 pm
I know but i felt important for a second.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:23:25 pm
That was just you being delusional.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 09:25:10 pm
That was just me being coercive
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:26:17 pm
Or was it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 08, 2010, 09:33:37 pm
It's no longer question time.

Democracy is over!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:36:31 pm
No it isn't......silly :roll:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:37:15 pm
Quote from: "anarchist13"
It's no longer question time.

Democracy is over!
You lie I say, you lie
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:39:14 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "anarchist13"
It's no longer question time.

Democracy is over!
You lie I say, you lie

You don't lie I say, you don't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:40:01 pm
I lied.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:40:34 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
You don't lie I say, you don't
You lie by saying that anarchist doesn't lie

btw averaging 10 posts a day now /
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:40:58 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:41:19 pm
Yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:41:56 pm
maybe
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:42:39 pm
Yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:43:39 pm
kinda
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:44:18 pm
maybe
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:44:31 pm
DILDO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:45:12 pm
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:45:38 pm
You can't resist
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:45:54 pm
The Dildoz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:46:37 pm
Dildoz ftw :!:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:47:35 pm
(0 o)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:48:44 pm
Hmmmmmmmm
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:49:35 pm
What can we do about this?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:50:01 pm
We can ponder about the right path to take
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 08, 2010, 09:50:23 pm
Resistance is futile :evil:  :evil:  :twisted:  :twisted:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 08, 2010, 09:51:23 pm
Yet futility is no excuse to stop
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 09:52:57 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Resistance is fertile :evil:  :evil:  :twisted:  :twisted:

Fixed.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 11:05:36 pm
The nice thing about this thread is that regardless of conversation, it's never off topic.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 08, 2010, 11:33:11 pm
YAY!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 08, 2010, 11:51:49 pm
Bananas
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 09, 2010, 05:37:19 am
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
Bananas
Are disgusting  :evil:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 09, 2010, 11:34:42 pm
Today's lesson, AND logical gates:
i  i  o
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 1

Why does this logical gate be correct?

0 0 1
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 09, 2010, 11:35:42 pm
Because blackbeard did say so!

ARRR
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 10, 2010, 12:35:38 am
Blackbear, the master of quantum.


Maybe
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 10, 2010, 06:59:04 am
Frederic: the Conqueror
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 07:59:06 am
I'm not getting this
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 10, 2010, 10:26:09 am
For all shall follow him through life into death.  Those who are loyal shall receive life eternal.

For BRAIN, FOR PINKY; For the world!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 10:37:55 am
Still not getting it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 10, 2010, 11:21:22 am
I win :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 11:21:48 am
Liar I say
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 10, 2010, 11:24:33 am
How dare you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 11:26:42 am
How dare I
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 10, 2010, 11:28:09 am
How dare who
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 11:29:42 am
How dare he
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 10, 2010, 11:30:54 am
How dare she
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 11:31:14 am
How dare it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 10, 2010, 11:32:57 am
How dare me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 11:33:34 am
How dare they
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 10, 2010, 12:03:09 pm
Who dare what now
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 10, 2010, 09:36:50 pm
How dare you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 10, 2010, 10:55:29 pm
How dare they
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 10, 2010, 10:58:44 pm
How am I?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 10, 2010, 11:43:23 pm
Just right.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 11, 2010, 01:33:19 am
A little to the left maybe.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 11, 2010, 05:47:05 am
More than a little to the left, it's actually quite a lot to the left
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 11, 2010, 06:22:10 am
wineh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 11, 2010, 07:22:08 am
Quote from: "jack west jr"
wineh
loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 11, 2010, 09:30:01 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "jack west jr"
wineh
[s:ayq7j6x6]loseh[/s:ayq7j6x6]
winneh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 11, 2010, 09:59:02 am
Quote from: "jack west jr"
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "jack west jr"
wineh
[s:14rhkfo4]loseh[/s:14rhkfo4]
[s:14rhkfo4]winneh[/s:14rhkfo4]
loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on March 11, 2010, 04:05:12 pm
LOSSERz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 11, 2010, 08:34:02 pm
Anyone who's playing this is a loser. I just lol whenever I see someone post here (this doesnt count)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 11, 2010, 08:52:52 pm
You're right

we should totally stop, we're letting the internet down.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 11, 2010, 08:53:33 pm
but we can't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 11, 2010, 08:54:20 pm
It's like heroin
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 11, 2010, 09:39:25 pm
Totally dudez
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 11, 2010, 09:51:13 pm
(http://media.g4tv.com/images/blog/2007/12/24/633340870479736265.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 12, 2010, 12:33:16 am
usual night out there, anarchist.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 12:37:16 am
you know it!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 12, 2010, 12:53:14 am
However I don't see where the rabbits are.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 01:10:25 am
You have to lvl up
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 12, 2010, 01:13:23 am
how do I do that the giant rats only give 3 exp
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 12, 2010, 05:52:47 am
^ Not getting this at all
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 12, 2010, 10:54:24 am
It's simple.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 12, 2010, 01:13:04 pm
Is it, is it really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 12, 2010, 02:18:12 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 05:36:28 pm
That's a paddlin'
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 12, 2010, 05:41:05 pm
ECHO FOUR CHARLIE NINE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 12, 2010, 05:42:24 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 12, 2010, 05:43:19 pm
A1 B2
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 05:43:49 pm
C3 D4
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 12, 2010, 05:44:13 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 12, 2010, 05:44:55 pm
You hit my tugger.

Wanna tugger?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 12, 2010, 08:48:38 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 12, 2010, 08:49:01 pm
You Funk My Tits
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 12, 2010, 09:05:30 pm
I WIN!

icanhazcheezburgernow?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 12, 2010, 09:13:01 pm
NO I WIN :twisted:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 09:35:17 pm
I'm afraid you have made a falsified claim sir.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: unitedrule on March 12, 2010, 09:38:22 pm
i win! :D  :twisted:  :evil:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 12, 2010, 09:39:00 pm
Quote from: "anarchist13"
I'm afraid you have made a falsified claim sir.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 12, 2010, 09:42:49 pm
I declare this thread over

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 09:55:26 pm
The people will decide when this is over!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 12, 2010, 10:02:43 pm
I AM THE PEOPLE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 10:03:53 pm
I AM THE POWAAHH
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 12, 2010, 10:30:08 pm
I am za ruler of za worldz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 10:35:21 pm
ORLY?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 12, 2010, 10:38:34 pm
yeah really
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 10:39:23 pm
damn, well my argument has fallen apart
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on March 12, 2010, 10:40:30 pm
inorite!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 12, 2010, 10:43:07 pm
Quote from: "anarchist13"
damn, well my argument has fallen apart
Argument, don't you mean my point of view in this ultra friendly conversation
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 12, 2010, 10:46:15 pm
We'll be fwendz and hold hands forevaaar!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:38:11 am
Lol gay.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 12:38:32 am
Quote from: "anarchist13"
We'll be fwendz and hold hands forevaaar!
and ever and ever :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:43:34 am
Lol homo's/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 12:49:15 am
Youz a homoz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:53:05 am
no u
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 12:56:53 am
I know you are, you said you are, but what am I?

EDIT: 250th post in entertainment /
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:00:58 am
no u
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 01:01:28 am
I know you are, you said you are, but what am I?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:02:35 am
no u
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 01:04:15 am
I know you are, you said you are, but what am I?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:06:14 am
no u
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 01:09:31 am
I know you are, you said you are, but what am I?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:11:48 am
ur mum.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 01:12:24 am
Hello mummy
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:24:17 am
no ur ur mum.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 01:25:42 am
But ur my mum

100 posts in this thread o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:32:46 am
wat
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 01:35:19 am
I am za winnerz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:37:19 am
wat
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 01:38:31 am
Wat your wat
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 01:41:02 am
Wat, I wat wat wat.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Parrington on March 13, 2010, 01:58:54 am
Wat wat wat?? Wat I do to win- wat a way!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 02:00:37 am
That's rather confusing
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 02:03:26 am
no it isn't.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 02:04:54 am
Yes it is
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 02:19:42 am
You should learn to under stand things better.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 02:34:59 am
No I shouldn't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 02:36:46 am
wubble wubble gubble blag
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 03:21:08 am
blag in a bag
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 11:32:38 am
Your mother.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 11:44:50 am
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 11:47:00 am
No
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 11:48:37 am
Yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 11:57:34 am
Maybe
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 11:59:03 am
Just yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:07:44 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 12:08:48 pm
maybe
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:09:33 pm
Do you wanna tug?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 12:10:19 pm
No! I think.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:26:20 pm
Why not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 12:39:55 pm
Because You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:41:56 pm
I'll do more than that.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 12:42:44 pm
Pls do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:43:18 pm
i'll do it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 12:45:05 pm
what you waiting for
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:49:15 pm
Erectile dysfunction to dissipate.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 12:50:02 pm
fair enough then.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 13, 2010, 12:51:04 pm
You can help.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 12:54:32 pm
Anything in particuliar, is it a full time job? What are the hours? What is the pay? What the pension like? Do i get a company car? :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: bowen199 on March 13, 2010, 01:17:47 pm
28 pages of spam. Bobloism rulez
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 13, 2010, 01:28:09 pm
You Funk My Funking Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 01:30:39 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 13, 2010, 01:33:05 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
You Funk My MOTHERFUNKING Battleship

fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 11:10:21 pm
Ryan, apparently your battleship fucks mothers
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 11:12:26 pm
I does all sort of things it's to big for me to control
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 11:14:45 pm
I can imagine
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 11:31:03 pm
I bet you can
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 13, 2010, 11:35:15 pm
I really do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 13, 2010, 11:37:49 pm
how often
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:08:42 am
all the time
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:09:25 am
my fear has been confirmed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:11:06 am
oh really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:11:49 am
yes put your hands where i can see them
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:15:09 am
you can see them, and you can see what they're doing ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:16:13 am
i'm sure it's a mix of emotions for both of us.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:20:29 am
It'll be sure to leave you on a high
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:21:21 am
That's what the all say
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:23:42 am
And I'll be like they and keep saying it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:26:27 am
until one day far into the future i become a happy man
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:28:06 am
because you will have finally had teh pleasure
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:28:57 am
after i have searched my whole life for it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:30:41 am
and to finally have it, to have fresh cheese out of a cow, together with some rotten tomatoes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:31:22 am
I'm overcome with emotion
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:32:16 am
because you love fresh cheese and rotten tomatoes oh so much
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:34:05 am
oh so much

(http://th05.deviantart.com/fs39/300W/f/2008/344/c/9/I_jizz_in_my_pants_by_HOLIMOUNT.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:34:40 am
What did it taste like?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:35:17 am
Everything beautiful in the world
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:35:48 am
What specifically did the rotten tomatoes taste like, try and describe the texture and flavour
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:37:30 am
Why not find out for yourself
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:38:19 am
My taste buds are not match for what will be such an eloquent and lyrical description of the rotten tomatoes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:40:08 am
I'm afraid my uneducated pallat will not do it justice
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:41:50 am
Yet your vivid imagination and your eloquence will surely make up for that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:43:11 am
Trust me i think your imagination is much better than mine
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:44:10 am
But your tongue is so much more skillful
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 12:45:22 am
Your not the first to tell me that ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:48:06 am
:lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 09:50:32 am
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 09:56:44 am
Sif you do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 09:58:03 am
I WIN NOW
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 09:58:20 am
No you don't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 10:03:28 am
I clearly do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 10:29:43 am
I disagree, it's rather unclear
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: drobinson09 on March 14, 2010, 11:19:55 am
Seems clear enough to me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 12:32:43 pm
Does it, does it really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 14, 2010, 01:08:42 pm
Yep.....
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 14, 2010, 05:49:03 pm
(http://gasbanditry.com/twg163/pictures/Demotivational%20Posters/wit-blackadder.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 14, 2010, 06:16:28 pm
Maybe...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 14, 2010, 09:46:39 pm
More like Jake has none  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 14, 2010, 10:50:48 pm
I have a vagina on my face.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 14, 2010, 11:09:40 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 15, 2010, 12:36:52 am
The Navy has no powaah here
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 02:41:03 am
Kinda does, considering I'm funking all his battleships.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 15, 2010, 05:31:36 am
Your battleship is funking
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on March 15, 2010, 05:32:44 am
win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 15, 2010, 05:35:36 am
Loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 04:33:05 pm
yes you are.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 04:38:33 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 04:43:47 pm
waaaaaa
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 04:47:17 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 04:48:24 pm
whahaha
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 04:49:04 pm
You Funk My Battleship
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 04:50:12 pm
Five.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 04:51:01 pm
Six
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 04:54:21 pm
Turtle.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 04:55:07 pm
Beach
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 05:00:41 pm
sound.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 05:01:15 pm
Light
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 05:08:54 pm
BEBEBEBEBE

What does yellow sound like?

Why doesn't the axle of the planet squeak?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 05:12:42 pm
Why is rain wet?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 05:14:14 pm
How do I pump blood?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 05:15:45 pm
How do you fly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 05:16:34 pm
with eagles.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 05:17:51 pm
The band?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 05:22:04 pm
No the flying ones.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 05:22:56 pm
But there scary
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 05:28:26 pm
magic 3 words.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 05:30:04 pm
How do you get to the jelly part in the center of a jaffa cake without biting through the chocolate?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 05:40:02 pm
Go through the cake/biscuit stuff at the bottom.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 06:04:30 pm
Thanks for the help
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 15, 2010, 06:05:04 pm
No problem
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 15, 2010, 09:58:53 pm
Or is it?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 09:59:24 pm
God not you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 15, 2010, 10:01:07 pm
o/ I'm off to school in a minute or so though. Got a chem test this morning =(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 10:01:58 pm
Good luck
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 15, 2010, 10:12:01 pm
kinda
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 11:06:06 pm
HI MIKE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 15, 2010, 11:15:05 pm
OHAII
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 15, 2010, 11:17:40 pm
Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiya
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 16, 2010, 12:04:53 am
Byyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeee
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 16, 2010, 12:55:17 am
Quote from: "anarchist13"
OHAII
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 16, 2010, 07:59:00 am
You es loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 16, 2010, 09:16:51 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
You es loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 16, 2010, 10:05:24 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Peejik"
You es loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 16, 2010, 05:56:02 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Peejik"
You es loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 16, 2010, 05:57:29 pm
ok you win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 16, 2010, 09:41:30 pm
You truly es de loseh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 16, 2010, 09:52:06 pm
No i win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 16, 2010, 11:37:06 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
No i win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 17, 2010, 12:50:48 am
Only I truely win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 17, 2010, 07:13:58 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Only I truely [s:2ryepcxa]win[/s:2ryepcxa] fail.
fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 17, 2010, 06:01:42 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Only I truely win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 17, 2010, 08:46:22 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Only I truely [s:37it3rnf]win[/s:37it3rnf] fail.
fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 17, 2010, 09:13:34 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Only I truely [s:f5i7lfnp]win[/s:f5i7lfnp] fail.
fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 17, 2010, 09:31:20 pm
MY HILL
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 17, 2010, 09:38:26 pm
O rly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 17, 2010, 09:42:52 pm
Yes really
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 18, 2010, 07:57:16 am
Really, you sure?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 18, 2010, 04:20:47 pm
I'm not.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 18, 2010, 06:37:05 pm
Well i am.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 18, 2010, 08:37:41 pm
Why?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 18, 2010, 08:48:56 pm
You know why
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 18, 2010, 08:55:46 pm
What about the children?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 18, 2010, 09:18:37 pm
What about the jaffa cake?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 18, 2010, 09:48:00 pm
What's jaffa cake?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 18, 2010, 09:55:04 pm
WHAT!!

What has this world come to?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 18, 2010, 09:56:31 pm
A place where someone doesn't know what a jaffa cake is....
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 18, 2010, 09:57:58 pm
FULL MOON > HALF MOON > TOTAL ECLIPSE!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 18, 2010, 09:59:11 pm
Not getting this...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on March 18, 2010, 10:03:01 pm
Lol it was an advertising campaign for the prduct jaffa cakes

GOOGLE IT. :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 18, 2010, 10:05:59 pm
I got to gos to school in like a minute though =(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on March 18, 2010, 10:10:47 pm
You go to school at 5 past ten at night? You lucky motherfunker.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 18, 2010, 10:13:28 pm
I live in a former penal colony
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 18, 2010, 11:14:32 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
I live in a former penal colony
Remember that your great great great grandmother was a thief who was raped by a mugger

 :D

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 19, 2010, 05:41:30 am
What happens if she was the one doing the raping?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 20, 2010, 02:13:51 am
Your nan be having a penis.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Howard27 on March 20, 2010, 11:56:27 am
I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 20, 2010, 12:11:13 pm
No not really, hypothetically, a woman could rape a man, by tying him to a bed, and then giving him Viagra. I mean seriously, if you want more details, ask Meghan
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 20, 2010, 02:35:14 pm
Who the flower is meghan?  I don't go into #euk cause it's full of aids and rape.

AIDS AND RAPE.

Besides, that still isn't rape.  This is a story about rape by Anna Kohler, lulz pioneer, albeit she is a cum slutting whore.

   
Quote
I was 18 years old, I was at my school and looking for something to do. As I was walking through the hall, I saw a packaged RapeX Condom lying on the ground. I picked it up and had an idea. I walked to the nearest bathroom and inserted it. After the device was inserted I walked to the Special Education lunch table where I sat down next to a shy 19 year old Autistic boy with very dirty hair.

    His name was Robbie; he told me his name immediately after I told him mine as he had been instructed by his "helper." Right after we introduced ourselves he noticed how attractive I was and having no experience with women, grabbed my left breast. Instead of smacking him and getting him permabanned from the school system, I smiled and allowed him to squeeze my size "D" breast as I thought about my plan.

    It was easy to get him to leave the lunchroom with me; we found the first open closet we saw. I took him inside and locked the door, than took off my clothes; he didn't need to be told to do so himself. I climbed down on top of him and let his large, Autistic penis stretch my vagina. A few seconds later, Robbie was in more pain than me as the RapeX Condom attached itself to his Penis. I continued to flower myself with his penis until I finally had an orgasm; than I quickly got off of Robbie, wrapped my shirt around my chest, and ran out the door with the retard trying to figure out what had happened. There was a Police Officer near the closet and I ran to him and crying, told him that Robbie had raped me. The RapeX Condom was all the evidence that was needed to convict the Asspie.

    You want to know why I did it? I love sex, and being as attractive as I am, it's easy to find guys to flower me, but unlike a guy I'm not supposed to get fucked that often. Since I didn't want to be called a slut, and I didn't want to put myself in a position where I could be raped and potentially injured; I decided to rape a worthless Asspie and get him put away for it where he'll be one less Lulz Killer in our society.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 20, 2010, 11:15:32 pm
How is it not rape, it's non-consensual sex.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 20, 2010, 11:17:16 pm
Surprise!

Did you like the story?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 20, 2010, 11:46:14 pm
It was ok I guess, but I was having my breakfast
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 20, 2010, 11:48:45 pm
I wanna try it some day.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 20, 2010, 11:49:48 pm
I think peejik classed as mentally disabled, being australian
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 20, 2010, 11:50:57 pm
I thought he was croatian.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 20, 2010, 11:54:43 pm
I think he's gay, is that a nationality
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 20, 2010, 11:55:25 pm
It's a race.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 12:10:59 am
Well he's first
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 21, 2010, 12:12:40 am
Gays are first?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 12:13:57 am
In the race, but apart from the race their definantly last
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 21, 2010, 12:14:30 am
That's because they want to watch your ass as you run.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 12:22:18 am
I WIN
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 21, 2010, 12:24:22 am
You're 20 posts ahead of me, I cannot win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 12:24:39 am
I WIN AGAIN
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 21, 2010, 12:25:10 am
Why?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 12:31:29 am
Because i am awesome
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 21, 2010, 12:42:18 am
I digress?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 21, 2010, 01:17:06 am
Or do you?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 01:17:46 am
no he doesn't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 21, 2010, 01:18:05 am
or does he?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 21, 2010, 01:19:40 am
I digest.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 21, 2010, 01:39:51 am
do you?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 21, 2010, 10:36:30 am
well I don't shit out undigested carrots.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 21, 2010, 09:46:09 pm
You sure, I mean, that might explain why you take so long on the toilet
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 09:46:42 pm
VICTORY
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 21, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
o rly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 09:59:46 pm
Yeah
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 21, 2010, 10:00:47 pm
I don't think so
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on March 21, 2010, 10:01:09 pm
No.

SECTION 1
THE TWO FACTORS OF A COMMODITY:
USE-VALUE AND VALUE
(THE SUBSTANCE OF VALUE AND THE MAGNITUDE OF VALUE)

 

The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as “an immense accumulation of commodities,”[1] its unit being a single commodity. Our investigation must therefore begin with the analysis of a commodity.

A commodity is, in the first place, an object outside us, a thing that by its properties satisfies human wants of some sort or another. The nature of such wants, whether, for instance, they spring from the stomach or from fancy, makes no difference.[2] Neither are we here concerned to know how the object satisfies these wants, whether directly as means of subsistence, or indirectly as means of production.

Every useful thing, as iron, paper, &c., may be looked at from the two points of view of quality and quantity. It is an assemblage of many properties, and may therefore be of use in various ways. To discover the various uses of things is the work of history.[3] So also is the establishment of socially-recognized standards of measure for the quantities of these useful objects. The diversity of these measures has its origin partly in the diverse nature of the objects to be measured, partly in convention.

The utility of a thing makes it a use value.[4] But this utility is not a thing of air. Being limited by the physical properties of the commodity, it has no existence apart from that commodity. A commodity, such as iron, corn, or a diamond, is therefore, so far as it is a material thing, a use value, something useful. This property of a commodity is independent of the amount of labour required to appropriate its useful qualities. When treating of use value, we always assume to be dealing with definite quantities, such as dozens of watches, yards of linen, or tons of iron. The use values of commodities furnish the material for a special study, that of the commercial knowledge of commodities.[5] Use values become a reality only by use or consumption: they also constitute the substance of all wealth, whatever may be the social form of that wealth. In the form of society we are about to consider, they are, in addition, the material depositories of exchange value.

Exchange value, at first sight, presents itself as a quantitative relation, as the proportion in which values in use of one sort are exchanged for those of another sort,[6] a relation constantly changing with time and place. Hence exchange value appears to be something accidental and purely relative, and consequently an intrinsic value, i.e., an exchange value that is inseparably connected with, inherent in commodities, seems a contradiction in terms.[7] Let us consider the matter a little more closely.

A given commodity, e.g., a quarter of wheat is exchanged for x blacking, y silk, or z gold, &c. – in short, for other commodities in the most different proportions. Instead of one exchange value, the wheat has, therefore, a great many. But since x blacking, y silk, or z gold &c., each represents the exchange value of one quarter of wheat, x blacking, y silk, z gold, &c., must, as exchange values, be replaceable by each other, or equal to each other. Therefore, first: the valid exchange values of a given commodity express something equal; secondly, exchange value, generally, is only the mode of expression, the phenomenal form, of something contained in it, yet distinguishable from it.

Let us take two commodities, e.g., corn and iron. The proportions in which they are exchangeable, whatever those proportions may be, can always be represented by an equation in which a given quantity of corn is equated to some quantity of iron: e.g., 1 quarter corn = x cwt. iron. What does this equation tell us? It tells us that in two different things – in 1 quarter of corn and x cwt. of iron, there exists in equal quantities something common to both. The two things must therefore be equal to a third, which in itself is neither the one nor the other. Each of them, so far as it is exchange value, must therefore be reducible to this third.

A simple geometrical illustration will make this clear. In order to calculate and compare the areas of rectilinear figures, we decompose them into triangles. But the area of the triangle itself is expressed by something totally different from its visible figure, namely, by half the product of the base multiplied by the altitude. In the same way the exchange values of commodities must be capable of being expressed in terms of something common to them all, of which thing they represent a greater or less quantity.

This common “something” cannot be either a geometrical, a chemical, or any other natural property of commodities. Such properties claim our attention only in so far as they affect the utility of those commodities, make them use values. But the exchange of commodities is evidently an act characterised by a total abstraction from use value. Then one use value is just as good as another, provided only it be present in sufficient quantity. Or, as old Barbon says,

“one sort of wares are as good as another, if the values be equal. There is no difference or distinction in things of equal value ... An hundred pounds’ worth of lead or iron, is of as great value as one hundred pounds’ worth of silver or gold.”[8]

As use values, commodities are, above all, of different qualities, but as exchange values they are merely different quantities, and consequently do not contain an atom of use value.

If then we leave out of consideration the use value of commodities, they have only one common property left, that of being products of labour. But even the product of labour itself has undergone a change in our hands. If we make abstraction from its use value, we make abstraction at the same time from the material elements and shapes that make the product a use value; we see in it no longer a table, a house, yarn, or any other useful thing. Its existence as a material thing is put out of sight. Neither can it any longer be regarded as the product of the labour of the joiner, the mason, the spinner, or of any other definite kind of productive labour. Along with the useful qualities of the products themselves, we put out of sight both the useful character of the various kinds of labour embodied in them, and the concrete forms of that labour; there is nothing left but what is common to them all; all are reduced to one and the same sort of labour, human labour in the abstract.

Let us now consider the residue of each of these products; it consists of the same unsubstantial reality in each, a mere congelation of homogeneous human labour, of labour power expended without regard to the mode of its expenditure. All that these things now tell us is, that human labour power has been expended in their production, that human labour is embodied in them. When looked at as crystals of this social substance, common to them all, they are – Values.

We have seen that when commodities are exchanged, their exchange value manifests itself as something totally independent of their use value. But if we abstract from their use value, there remains their Value as defined above. Therefore, the common substance that manifests itself in the exchange value of commodities, whenever they are exchanged, is their value. The progress of our investigation will show that exchange value is the only form in which the value of commodities can manifest itself or be expressed. For the present, however, we have to consider the nature of value independently of this, its form.

A use value, or useful article, therefore, has value only because human labour in the abstract has been embodied or materialised in it. How, then, is the magnitude of this value to be measured? Plainly, by the quantity of the value-creating substance, the labour, contained in the article. The quantity of labour, however, is measured by its duration, and labour time in its turn finds its standard in weeks, days, and hours.

Some people might think that if the value of a commodity is determined by the quantity of labour spent on it, the more idle and unskilful the labourer, the more valuable would his commodity be, because more time would be required in its production. The labour, however, that forms the substance of value, is homogeneous human labour, expenditure of one uniform labour power. The total labour power of society, which is embodied in the sum total of the values of all commodities produced by that society, counts here as one homogeneous mass of human labour power, composed though it be of innumerable individual units. Each of these units is the same as any other, so far as it has the character of the average labour power of society, and takes effect as such; that is, so far as it requires for producing a commodity, no more time than is needed on an average, no more than is socially necessary. The labour time socially necessary is that required to produce an article under the normal conditions of production, and with the average degree of skill and intensity prevalent at the time. The introduction of power-looms into England probably reduced by one-half the labour required to weave a given quantity of yarn into cloth. The hand-loom weavers, as a matter of fact, continued to require the same time as before; but for all that, the product of one hour of their labour represented after the change only half an hour’s social labour, and consequently fell to one-half its former value.

We see then that that which determines the magnitude of the value of any article is the amount of labour socially necessary, or the labour time socially necessary for its production.[9] Each individual commodity, in this connexion, is to be considered as an average sample of its class.[10] Commodities, therefore, in which equal quantities of labour are embodied, or which can be produced in the same time, have the same value. The value of one commodity is to the value of any other, as the labour time necessary for the production of the one is to that necessary for the production of the other. “As values, all commodities are only definite masses of congealed labour time.”[11]

The value of a commodity would therefore remain constant, if the labour time required for its production also remained constant. But the latter changes with every variation in the productiveness of labour. This productiveness is determined by various circumstances, amongst others, by the average amount of skill of the workmen, the state of science, and the degree of its practical application, the social organisation of production, the extent and capabilities of the means of production, and by physical conditions. For example, the same amount of labour in favourable seasons is embodied in 8 bushels of corn, and in unfavourable, only in four. The same labour extracts from rich mines more metal than from poor mines. Diamonds are of very rare occurrence on the earth’s surface, and hence their discovery costs, on an average, a great deal of labour time. Consequently much labour is represented in a small compass. Jacob doubts whether gold has ever been paid for at its full value. This applies still more to diamonds. According to Eschwege, the total produce of the Brazilian diamond mines for the eighty years, ending in 1823, had not realised the price of one-and-a-half years’ average produce of the sugar and coffee plantations of the same country, although the diamonds cost much more labour, and therefore represented more value. With richer mines, the same quantity of labour would embody itself in more diamonds, and their value would fall. If we could succeed at a small expenditure of labour, in converting carbon into diamonds, their value might fall below that of bricks. In general, the greater the productiveness of labour, the less is the labour time required for the production of an article, the less is the amount of labour crystallised in that article, and the less is its value; and vice versâ, the less the productiveness of labour, the greater is the labour time required for the production of an article, and the greater is its value. The value of a commodity, therefore, varies directly as the quantity, and inversely as the productiveness, of the labour incorporated in it. [A]

A thing can be a use value, without having value. This is the case whenever its utility to man is not due to labour. Such are air, virgin soil, natural meadows, &c. A thing can be useful, and the product of human labour, without being a commodity. Whoever directly satisfies his wants with the produce of his own labour, creates, indeed, use values, but not commodities. In order to produce the latter, he must not only produce use values, but use values for others, social use values. (And not only for others, without more. The mediaeval peasant produced quit-rent-corn for his feudal lord and tithe-corn for his parson. But neither the quit-rent-corn nor the tithe-corn became commodities by reason of the fact that they had been produced for others. To become a commodity a product must be transferred to another, whom it will serve as a use value, by means of an exchange.)[12] Lastly nothing can have value, without being an object of utility. If the thing is useless, so is the labour contained in it; the labour does not count as labour, and therefore creates no value.

 
SECTION 2
THE TWOFOLD CHARACTER OF
THE LABOUR EMBODIED IN COMMODITIES

 

At first sight a commodity presented itself to us as a complex of two things – use value and exchange value. Later on, we saw also that labour, too, possesses the same twofold nature; for, so far as it finds expression in value, it does not possess the same characteristics that belong to it as a creator of use values. I was the first to point out and to examine critically this twofold nature of the labour contained in commodities. As this point is the pivot on which a clear comprehension of political economy turns, we must go more into detail.

Let us take two commodities such as a coat and 10 yards of linen, and let the former be double the value of the latter, so that, if 10 yards of linen = W, the coat = 2W.

The coat is a use value that satisfies a particular want. Its existence is the result of a special sort of productive activity, the nature of which is determined by its aim, mode of operation, subject, means, and result. The labour, whose utility is thus represented by the value in use of its product, or which manifests itself by making its product a use value, we call useful labour. In this connection we consider only its useful effect.

As the coat and the linen are two qualitatively different use values, so also are the two forms of labour that produce them, tailoring and weaving. Were these two objects not qualitatively different, not produced respectively by labour of different quality, they could not stand to each other in the relation of commodities. Coats are not exchanged for coats, one use value is not exchanged for another of the same kind.

To all the different varieties of values in use there correspond as many different kinds of useful labour, classified according to the order, genus, species, and variety to which they belong in the social division of labour. This division of labour is a necessary condition for the production of commodities, but it does not follow, conversely, that the production of commodities is a necessary condition for the division of labour. In the primitive Indian community there is social division of labour, without production of commodities. Or, to take an example nearer home, in every factory the labour is divided according to a system, but this division is not brought about by the operatives mutually exchanging their individual products. Only such products can become commodities with regard to each other, as result from different kinds of labour, each kind being carried on independently and for the account of private individuals.

To resume, then: In the use value of each commodity there is contained useful labour, i.e., productive activity of a definite kind and exercised with a definite aim. Use values cannot confront each other as commodities, unless the useful labour embodied in them is qualitatively different in each of them. In a community, the produce of which in general takes the form of commodities, i.e., in a community of commodity producers, this qualitative difference between the useful forms of labour that are carried on independently by individual producers, each on their own account, develops into a complex system, a social division of labour.

Anyhow, whether the coat be worn by the tailor or by his customer, in either case it operates as a use value. Nor is the relation between the coat and the labour that produced it altered by the circumstance that tailoring may have become a special trade, an independent branch of the social division of labour. Wherever the want of clothing forced them to it, the human race made clothes for thousands of years, without a single man becoming a tailor. But coats and linen, like every other element of material wealth that is not the spontaneous produce of Nature, must invariably owe their existence to a special productive activity, exercised with a definite aim, an activity that appropriates particular nature-given materials to particular human wants. So far therefore as labour is a creator of use value, is useful labour, it is a necessary condition, independent of all forms of society, for the existence of the human race; it is an eternal nature-imposed necessity, without which there can be no material exchanges between man and Nature, and therefore no life.

The use values, coat, linen, &c., i.e., the bodies of commodities, are combinations of two elements – matter and labour. If we take away the useful labour expended upon them, a material substratum is always left, which is furnished by Nature without the help of man. The latter can work only as Nature does, that is by changing the form of matter.[13] Nay more, in this work of changing the form he is constantly helped by natural forces. We see, then, that labour is not the only source of material wealth, of use values produced by labour. As William Petty puts it, labour is its father and the earth its mother.

Let us now pass from the commodity considered as a use value to the value of commodities.

By our assumption, the coat is worth twice as much as the linen. But this is a mere quantitative difference, which for the present does not concern us. We bear in mind, however, that if the value of the coat is double that of 10 yds of linen, 20 yds of linen must have the same value as one coat. So far as they are values, the coat and the linen are things of a like substance, objective expressions of essentially identical labour. But tailoring and weaving are, qualitatively, different kinds of labour. There are, however, states of society in which one and the same man does tailoring and weaving alternately, in which case these two forms of labour are mere modifications of the labour of the same individual, and not special and fixed functions of different persons, just as the coat which our tailor makes one day, and the trousers which he makes another day, imply only a variation in the labour of one and the same individual. Moreover, we see at a glance that, in our capitalist society, a given portion of human labour is, in accordance with the varying demand, at one time supplied in the form of tailoring, at another in the form of weaving. This change may possibly not take place without friction, but take place it must.

Productive activity, if we leave out of sight its special form, viz., the useful character of the labour, is nothing but the expenditure of human labour power. Tailoring and weaving, though qualitatively different productive activities, are each a productive expenditure of human brains, nerves, and muscles, and in this sense are human labour. They are but two different modes of expending human labour power. Of course, this labour power, which remains the same under all its modifications, must have attained a certain pitch of development before it can be expended in a multiplicity of modes. But the value of a commodity represents human labour in the abstract, the expenditure of human labour in general. And just as in society, a general or a banker plays a great part, but mere man, on the other hand, a very shabby part,[14] so here with mere human labour. It is the expenditure of simple labour power, i.e., of the labour power which, on an average, apart from any special development, exists in the organism of every ordinary individual. Simple average labour, it is true, varies in character in different countries and at different times, but in a particular society it is given. Skilled labour counts only as simple labour intensified, or rather, as multiplied simple labour, a given quantity of skilled being considered equal to a greater quantity of simple labour. Experience shows that this reduction is constantly being made. A commodity may be the product of the most skilled labour, but its value, by equating it to the product of simple unskilled labour, represents a definite quantity of the latter labour alone.[15] The different proportions in which different sorts of labour are reduced to unskilled labour as their standard, are established by a social process that goes on behind the backs of the producers, and, consequently, appear to be fixed by custom. For simplicity’s sake we shall henceforth account every kind of labour to be unskilled, simple labour; by this we do no more than save ourselves the trouble of making the reduction.

Just as, therefore, in viewing the coat and linen as values, we abstract from their different use values, so it is with the labour represented by those values: we disregard the difference between its useful forms, weaving and tailoring. As the use values, coat and linen, are combinations of special productive activities with cloth and yarn, while the values, coat and linen, are, on the other hand, mere homogeneous congelations of undifferentiated labour, so the labour embodied in these latter values does not count by virtue of its productive relation to cloth and yarn, but only as being expenditure of human labour power. Tailoring and weaving are necessary factors in the creation of the use values, coat and linen, precisely because these two kinds of labour are of different qualities; but only in so far as abstraction is made from their special qualities, only in so far as both possess the same quality of being human labour, do tailoring and weaving form the substance of the values of the same articles.

Coats and linen, however, are not merely values, but values of definite magnitude, and according to our assumption, the coat is worth twice as much as the ten yards of linen. Whence this difference in their values? It is owing to the fact that the linen contains only half as much labour as the coat, and consequently, that in the production of the latter, labour power must have been expended during twice the time necessary for the production of the former.

While, therefore, with reference to use value, the labour contained in a commodity counts only qualitatively, with reference to value it counts only quantitatively, and must first be reduced to human labour pure and simple. In the former case, it is a question of How and What, in the latter of How much? How long a time? Since the magnitude of the value of a commodity represents only the quantity of labour embodied in it, it follows that all commodities, when taken in certain proportions, must be equal in value.

If the productive power of all the different sorts of useful labour required for the production of a coat remains unchanged, the sum of the values of the coats produced increases with their number. If one coat represents x days’ labour, two coats represent 2x days’ labour, and so on. But assume that the duration of the labour necessary for the production of a coat becomes doubled or halved. In the first case one coat is worth as much as two coats were before; in the second case, two coats are only worth as much as one was before, although in both cases one coat renders the same service as before, and the useful labour embodied in it remains of the same quality. But the quantity of labour spent on its production has altered.

An increase in the quantity of use values is an increase of material wealth. With two coats two men can be clothed, with one coat only one man. Nevertheless, an increased quantity of material wealth may correspond to a simultaneous fall in the magnitude of its value. This antagonistic movement has its origin in the twofold character of labour. Productive power has reference, of course, only to labour of some useful concrete form, the efficacy of any special productive activity during a given time being dependent on its productiveness. Useful labour becomes, therefore, a more or less abundant source of products, in proportion to the rise or fall of its productiveness. On the other hand, no change in this productiveness affects the labour represented by value. Since productive power is an attribute of the concrete useful forms of labour, of course it can no longer have any bearing on that labour, so soon as we make abstraction from those concrete useful forms. However then productive power may vary, the same labour, exercised during equal periods of time, always yields equal amounts of value. But it will yield, during equal periods of time, different quantities of values in use; more, if the productive power rise, fewer, if it fall. The same change in productive power, which increases the fruitfulness of labour, and, in consequence, the quantity of use values produced by that labour, will diminish the total value of this increased quantity of use values, provided such change shorten the total labour time necessary for their production; and vice versâ.

On the one hand all labour is, speaking physiologically, an expenditure of human labour power, and in its character of identical abstract human labour, it creates and forms the value of commodities. On the other hand, all labour is the expenditure of human labour power in a special form and with a definite aim, and in this, its character of concrete useful labour, it produces use values.[16]

 
SECTION 3
THE FORM OF VALUE OR EXCHANGE VALUE

 

Commodities come into the world in the shape of use values, articles, or goods, such as iron, linen, corn, &c. This is their plain, homely, bodily form. They are, however, commodities, only because they are something twofold, both objects of utility, and, at the same time, depositories of value. They manifest themselves therefore as commodities, or have the form of commodities, only in so far as they have two forms, a physical or natural form, and a value form.

The reality of the value of commodities differs in this respect from Dame Quickly, that we don’t know “where to have it.” The value of commodities is the very opposite of the coarse materiality of their substance, not an atom of matter enters into its composition. Turn and examine a single commodity, by itself, as we will, yet in so far as it remains an object of value, it seems impossible to grasp it. If, however, we bear in mind that the value of commodities has a purely social reality, and that they acquire this reality only in so far as they are expressions or embodiments of one identical social substance, viz., human labour, it follows as a matter of course, that value can only manifest itself in the social relation of commodity to commodity. In fact we started from exchange value, or the exchange relation of commodities, in order to get at the value that lies hidden behind it. We must now return to this form under which value first appeared to us.

Every one knows, if he knows nothing else, that commodities have a value form common to them all, and presenting a marked contrast with the varied bodily forms of their use values. I mean their money form. Here, however, a task is set us, the performance of which has never yet even been attempted by bourgeois economy, the task of tracing the genesis of this money form, of developing the expression of value implied in the value relation of commodities, from its simplest, almost imperceptible outline, to the dazzling money-form. By doing this we shall, at the same time, solve the riddle presented by money.

The simplest value-relation is evidently that of one commodity to some one other commodity of a different kind. Hence the relation between the values of two commodities supplies us with the simplest expression of the value of a single commodity.
A. Elementary or Accidental Form Of Value

x commodity A = y commodity B, or
x commodity A is worth y commodity B.

20 yards of linen = 1 coat, or
20 Yards of linen are worth 1 coat.

1. The two poles of the expression of value. Relative form and Equivalent form

The whole mystery of the form of value lies hidden in this elementary form. Its analysis, therefore, is our real difficulty.

Here two different kinds of commodities (in our example the linen and the coat), evidently play two different parts. The linen expresses its value in the coat; the coat serves as the material in which that value is expressed. The former plays an active, the latter a passive, part. The value of the linen is represented as relative value, or appears in relative form. The coat officiates as equivalent, or appears in equivalent form.

The relative form and the equivalent form are two intimately connected, mutually dependent and inseparable elements of the expression of value; but, at the same time, are mutually exclusive, antagonistic extremes – i.e., poles of the same expression. They are allotted respectively to the two different commodities brought into relation by that expression. It is not possible to express the value of linen in linen. 20 yards of linen = 20 yards of linen is no expression of value. On the contrary, such an equation merely says that 20 yards of linen are nothing else than 20 yards of linen, a definite quantity of the use value linen. The value of the linen can therefore be expressed only relatively – i.e., in some other commodity. The relative form of the value of the linen presupposes, therefore, the presence of some other commodity – here the coat – under the form of an equivalent. On the other hand, the commodity that figures as the equivalent cannot at the same time assume the relative form. That second commodity is not the one whose value is expressed. Its function is merely to serve as the material in which the value of the first commodity is expressed.

No doubt, the expression 20 yards of linen = 1 coat, or 20 yards of linen are worth 1 coat, implies the opposite relation. 1 coat = 20 yards of linen, or 1 coat is worth 20 yards of linen. But, in that case, I must reverse the equation, in order to express the value of the coat relatively; and. so soon as I do that the linen becomes the equivalent instead of the coat. A single commodity cannot, therefore, simultaneously assume, in the same expression of value, both forms. The very polarity of these forms makes them mutually exclusive.

Whether, then, a commodity assumes the relative form, or the opposite equivalent form, depends entirely upon its accidental position in the expression of value – that is, upon whether it is the commodity whose value is being expressed or the commodity in which value is being expressed.
2. The Relative Form of value

(a.) The nature and import of this form

In order to discover how the elementary expression of the value of a commodity lies hidden in the value relation of two commodities, we must, in the first place, consider the latter entirely apart from its quantitative aspect. The usual mode of procedure is generally the reverse, and in the value relation nothing is seen but the proportion between definite quantities of two different sorts of commodities that are considered equal to each other. It is apt to be forgotten that the magnitudes of different things can be compared quantitatively, only when those magnitudes are expressed in terms of the same unit. It is only as expressions of such a unit that they are of the same denomination, and therefore commensurable.[17]

Whether 20 yards of linen = 1 coat or = 20 coats or = x coats – that is, whether a given quantity of linen is worth few or many coats, every such statement implies that the linen and coats, as magnitudes of value, are expressions of the same unit, things of the same kind. Linen = coat is the basis of the equation.

But the two commodities whose identity of quality is thus assumed, do not play the same part. It is only the value of the linen that is expressed. And how? By its reference to the coat as its equivalent, as something that can be exchanged for it. In this relation the coat is the mode of existence of value, is value embodied, for only as such is it the same as the linen. On the other hand, the linen’s own value comes to the front, receives independent expression, for it is only as being value that it is comparable with the coat as a thing of equal value, or exchangeable with the coat. To borrow an illustration from chemistry, butyric acid is a different substance from propyl formate. Yet both are made up of the same chemical substances, carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O), and that, too, in like proportions – namely, C4H8O2. If now we equate butyric acid to propyl formate, then, in the first place, propyl formate would be, in this relation, merely a form of existence of C4H8O2; and in the second place, we should be stating that butyric acid also consists of C4H8O2. Therefore, by thus equating the two substances, expression would be given to their chemical composition, while their different physical forms would be neglected.

If we say that, as values, commodities are mere congelations of human labour, we reduce them by our analysis, it is true, to the abstraction, value; but we ascribe to this value no form apart from their bodily form. It is otherwise in the value relation of one commodity to another. Here, the one stands forth in its character of value by reason of its relation to the other.

By making the coat the equivalent of the linen, we equate the labour embodied in the former to that in the latter. Now, it is true that the tailoring, which makes the coat, is concrete labour of a different sort from the weaving which makes the linen. But the act of equating it to the weaving, reduces the tailoring to that which is really equal in the two kinds of labour, to their common character of human labour. In this roundabout way, then, the fact is expressed, that weaving also, in so far as it weaves value, has nothing to distinguish it from tailoring, and, consequently, is abstract human labour. It is the expression of equivalence between different sorts of commodities that alone brings into relief the specific character of value-creating labour, and this it does by actually reducing the different varieties of labour embodied in the different kinds of commodities to their common quality of human labour in the abstract.[18]

There is, however, something else required beyond the expression of the specific character of the labour of which the value of the linen consists. Human labour power in motion, or human labour, creates value, but is not itself value. It becomes value only in its congealed state, when embodied in the form of some object. In order to express the value of the linen as a congelation of human labour, that value must be expressed as having objective existence, as being a something materially different from the linen itself, and yet a something common to the linen and all other commodities. The problem is already solved.

When occupying the position of equivalent in the equation of value, the coat ranks qualitatively as the equal of the linen, as something of the same kind, because it is value. In this position it is a thing in which we see nothing but value, or whose palpable bodily form represents value. Yet the coat itself, the body of the commodity, coat, is a mere use value. A coat as such no more tells us it is value, than does the first piece of linen we take hold of. This shows that when placed in value-relation to the linen, the coat signifies more than when out of that relation, just as many a man strutting about in a gorgeous uniform counts for more than when in mufti.

In the production of the coat, human labour power, in the shape of tailoring, must have been actually expended. Human labour is therefore accumulated in it. In this aspect the coat is a depository of value, but though worn to a thread, it does not let this fact show through. And as equivalent of the linen in the value equation, it exists under this aspect alone, counts therefore as embodied value, as a body that is value. A, for instance, cannot be “your majesty” to B, unless at the same time majesty in B’s eyes assumes the bodily form of A, and, what is more, with every new father of the people, changes its features, hair, and many other things besides.

Hence, in the value equation, in which the coat is the equivalent of the linen, the coat officiates as the form of value. The value of the commodity linen is expressed by the bodily form of the commodity coat, the value of one by the use value of the other. As a use value, the linen is something palpably different from the coat; as value, it is the same as the coat, and now has the appearance of a coat. Thus the linen acquires a value form different from its physical form. The fact that it is value, is made manifest by its equality with the coat, just as the sheep’s nature of a Christian is shown in his resemblance to the Lamb of God.

We see, then, all that our analysis of the value of commodities has already told us, is told us by the linen itself, so soon as it comes into communication with another commodity, the coat. Only it betrays its thoughts in that language with which alone it is familiar, the language of commodities. In order to tell us that its own value is created by labour in its abstract character of human labour, it says that the coat, in so far as it is worth as much as the linen, and therefore is value, consists of the same labour as the linen. In order to inform us that its sublime reality as value is not the same as its buckram body, it says that value has the appearance of a coat, and consequently that so far as the linen is value, it and the coat are as like as two peas. We may here remark, that the language of commodities has, besides Hebrew, many other more or less correct dialects. The German “Wertsein,” to be worth, for instance, expresses in a less striking manner than the Romance verbs “valere,” “valer,” “valoir,” that the equating of commodity B to commodity A, is commodity A’s own mode of expressing its value. Paris vaut bien une messe. [Paris is certainly worth a mass]

By means, therefore, of the value-relation expressed in our equation, the bodily form of commodity B becomes the value form of commodity A, or the body of commodity B acts as a mirror to the value of commodity A.[19] By putting itself in relation with commodity B, as value in propriâ personâ, as the matter of which human labour is made up, the commodity A converts the value in use, B, into the substance in which to express its, A’s, own value. The value of A, thus expressed in the use value of B, has taken the form of relative value.

(b.) Quantitative determination of Relative value

Every commodity, whose value it is intended to express, is a useful object of given quantity, as 15 bushels of corn, or 100 lbs of coffee. And a given quantity of any commodity contains a definite quantity of human labour. The value form must therefore not only express value generally, but also value in definite quantity. Therefore, in the value relation of commodity A to commodity B, of the linen to the coat, not only is the latter, as value in general, made the equal in quality of the linen, but a definite quantity of coat (1 coat) is made the equivalent of a definite quantity (20 yards) of linen.

The equation, 20 yards of linen = 1 coat, or 20 yards of linen are worth one coat, implies that the same quantity of value substance (congealed labour) is embodied in both; that the two commodities have each cost the same amount of labour of the same quantity of labour time. But the labour time necessary for the production of 20 yards of linen or 1 coat varies with every change in the productiveness of weaving or tailoring. We have now to consider the influence of such changes on the quantitative aspect of the relative expression of value.

I. Let the value of the linen vary,[20] that of the coat remaining constant. If, say in consequence of the exhaustion of flax-growing soil, the labour time necessary for the production of the linen be doubled, the value of the linen will also be doubled. Instead of the equation, 20 yards of linen = 1 coat, we should have 20 yards of linen = 2 coats, since 1 coat would now contain only half the labour time embodied in 20 yards of linen. If, on the other hand, in consequence, say, of improved looms, this labour time be reduced by one-half, the value of the linen would fall by one-half. Consequently, we should have 20 yards of linen = ½ coat. The relative value of commodity A, i.e., its value expressed in commodity B, rises and falls directly as the value of A, the value of B being supposed constant.

II. Let the value of the linen remain constant, while the value of the coat varies. If, under these circumstances, in consequence, for instance, of a poor crop of wool, the labour time necessary for the production of a coat becomes doubled, we have instead of 20 yards of linen = 1 coat, 20 yards of linen = ½ coat. If, on the other hand, the value of the coat sinks by one-half, then 20 yards of linen = 2 coats. Hence, if the value of commodity A remain constant, its relative value expressed in commodity B rises and falls inversely as the value of B.

If we compare the different cases in I and II, we see that the same change of magnitude in relative value may arise from totally opposite causes. Thus, the equation, 20 yards of linen = 1 coat, becomes 20 yards of linen = 2 coats, either, because the value of the linen has doubled, or because the value of the coat has fallen by one-half; and it becomes 20 yards of linen = ½ coat, either, because the value of the linen has fallen by one-half, or because the value of the coat has doubled.

III. Let the quantities of labour time respectively necessary for the production of the linen and the coat vary simultaneously in the same direction and in the same proportion. In this case 20 yards of linen continue equal to 1 coat, however much their values may have altered. Their change of value is seen as soon as they are compared with a third commodity, whose value has remained constant. If the values of all commodities rose or fell simultaneously, and in the same proportion, their relative values would remain unaltered. Their real change of value would appear from the diminished or increased quantity of commodities produced in a given time.

IV. The labour time respectively necessary for the production of the linen and the coat, and therefore the value of these commodities may simultaneously vary in the same direction, but at unequal rates or in opposite directions, or in other ways. The effect of all these possible different variations, on the relative value of a commodity, may be deduced from the results of I, II, and III.

Thus real changes in the magnitude of value are neither unequivocally nor exhaustively reflected in their relative expression, that is, in the equation expressing the magnitude of relative value. The relative value of a commodity may vary, although its value remains constant. Its relative value may remain constant, although its value varies; and finally, simultaneous variations in the magnitude of value and in that of its relative expression by no means necessarily correspond in amount.[21]
3. The Equivalent form of value

We have seen that commodity A (the linen), by expressing its value in the use value of a commodity differing in kind (the coat), at the same time impresses upon the latter a specific form of value, namely that of the equivalent. The commodity linen manifests its quality of having a value by the fact that the coat, without having assumed a value form different from its bodily form, is equated to the linen. The fact that the latter therefore has a value is expressed by saying that the coat is directly exchangeable with it. Therefore, when we say that a commodity is in the equivalent form, we express the fact that it is directly exchangeable with other commodities.

When one commodity, such as a coat, serves as the equivalent of another, such as linen, and coats consequently acquire the characteristic property of being directly exchangeable with linen, we are far from knowing in what proportion the two are exchangeable. The value of the linen being given in magnitude, that proportion depends on the value of the coat. Whether the coat serves as the equivalent and the linen as relative value, or the linen as the equivalent and the coat as relative value, the magnitude of the coat’s value is determined, independently of its value form, by the labour time necessary for its production. But whenever the coat assumes in the equation of value, the position of equivalent, its value acquires no quantitative expression; on the contrary, the commodity coat now figures only as a definite quantity of some article.

For instance, 40 yards of linen are worth – what? 2 coats. Because the commodity coat here plays the part of equivalent, because the use-value coat, as opposed to the linen, figures as an embodiment of value, therefore a definite number of coats suffices to express the definite quantity of value in the linen. Two coats may therefore express the quantity of value of 40 yards of linen, but they can never express the quantity of their own value. A superficial observation of this fact, namely, that in the equation of value, the equivalent figures exclusively as a simple quantity of some article, of some use value, has misled Bailey, as also many others, both before and after him, into seeing, in the expression of value, merely a quantitative relation. The truth being, that when a commodity acts as equivalent, no quantitative determination of its value is expressed.

The first peculiarity that strikes us, in considering the form of the equivalent, is this: use value becomes the form of manifestation, the phenomenal form of its opposite, value.

The bodily form of the commodity becomes its value form. But, mark well, that this quid pro quo exists in the case of any commodity B, only when some other commodity A enters into a value relation with it, and then only within the limits of this relation. Since no commodity can stand in the relation of equivalent to itself, and thus turn its own bodily shape into the expression of its own value, every commodity is compelled to choose some other commodity for its equivalent, and to accept the use value, that is to say, the bodily shape of that other commodity as the form of its own value.

One of the measures that we apply to commodities as material substances, as use values, will serve to illustrate this point. A sugar-loaf being a body, is heavy, and therefore has weight: but we can neither see nor touch this weight. We then take various pieces of iron, whose weight has been determined beforehand. The iron, as iron, is no more the form of manifestation of weight, than is the sugar-loaf. Nevertheless, in order to express the sugar-loaf as so much weight, we put it into a weight-relation with the iron. In this relation, the iron officiates as a body representing nothing but weight. A certain quantity of iron therefore serves as the measure of the weight of the sugar, and represents, in relation to the sugar-loaf, weight embodied, the form of manifestation of weight. This part is played by the iron only within this relation, into which the sugar or any other body, whose weight has to be determined, enters with the iron. Were they not both heavy, they could not enter into this relation, and the one could therefore not serve as the expression of the weight of the other. When we throw both into the scales, we see in reality, that as weight they are both the same, and that, therefore, when taken in proper proportions, they have the same weight. Just as the substance iron, as a measure of weight, represents in relation to the sugar-loaf weight alone, so, in our expression of value, the material object, coat, in relation to the linen, represents value alone.

Here, however, the analogy ceases. The iron, in the expression of the weight of the sugar-loaf, represents a natural property common to both bodies, namely their weight; but the coat, in the expression of value of the linen, represents a non-natural property of both, something purely social, namely, their value.

Since the relative form of value of a commodity – the linen, for example – expresses the value of that commodity, as being something wholly different from its substance and properties, as being, for instance, coat-like, we see that this expression itself indicates that some social relation lies at the bottom of it. With the equivalent form it is just the contrary. The very essence of this form is that the material commodity itself – the coat – just as it is, expresses value, and is endowed with the form of value by Nature itself. Of course this holds good only so long as the value relation exists, in which the coat stands in the position of equivalent to the linen.[22] Since, however, the properties of a thing are not the result of its relations to other things, but only manifest themselves in such relations, the coat seems to be endowed with its equivalent form, its property of being directly exchangeable, just as much by Nature as it is endowed with the property of being heavy, or the capacity to keep us warm. Hence the enigmatical character of the equivalent form which escapes the notice of the bourgeois political economist, until this form, completely developed, confronts him in the shape of money. He then seeks to explain away the mystical character of gold and silver, by substituting for them less dazzling commodities, and by reciting, with ever renewed satisfaction, the catalogue of all possible commodities which at one time or another have played the part of equivalent. He has not the least suspicion that the most simple expression of value, such as 20 yds of linen = 1 coat, already propounds the riddle of the equivalent form for our solution.

The body of the commodity that serves as the equivalent, figures as the materialisation of human labour in the abstract, and is at the same time the product of some specifically useful concrete labour. This concrete labour becomes, therefore, the medium for expressing abstract human labour. If on the one hand the coat ranks as nothing but the embodiment of abstract human labour, so, on the other hand, the tailoring which is actually embodied in it, counts as nothing but the form under which that abstract labour is realised. In the expression of value of the linen, the utility of the tailoring consists, not in making clothes, but in making an object, which we at once recognise to be Value, and therefore to be a congelation of labour, but of labour indistinguishable from that realised in the value of the linen. In order to act as such a mirror of value, the labour of tailoring must reflect nothing besides its own abstract quality of being human labour generally.

In tailoring, as well as in weaving, human labour power is expended. Both, therefore, possess the general property of being human labour, and may, therefore, in certain cases, such as in the production of value, have to be considered under this aspect alone. There is nothing mysterious in this. But in the expression of value there is a complete turn of the tables. For instance, how is the fact to be expressed that weaving creates the value of the linen, not by virtue of being weaving, as such, but by reason of its general property of being human labour? Simply by opposing to weaving that other particular form of concrete labour (in this instance tailoring), which produces the equivalent of the product of weaving. Just as the coat in its bodily form became a direct expression of value, so now does tailoring, a concrete form of labour, appear as the direct and palpable embodiment of human labour generally.

Hence, the second peculiarity of the equivalent form is, that concrete labour becomes the form under which its opposite, abstract human labour, manifests itself.

But because this concrete labour, tailoring in our case, ranks as, and is directly identified with, undifferentiated human labour, it also ranks as identical with any other sort of labour, and therefore with that embodied in the linen. Consequently, although, like all other commodity-producing labour, it is the labour of private individuals, yet, at the same time, it ranks as labour directly social in its character. This is the reason why it results in a product directly exchangeable with other commodities. We have then a third peculiarity of the equivalent form, namely, that the labour of private individuals takes the form of its opposite, labour directly social in its form.

The two latter peculiarities of the equivalent form will become more intelligible if we go back to the great thinker who was the first to analyse so many forms, whether of thought, society, or Nature, and amongst them also the form of value. I mean Aristotle.

In the first place, he clearly enunciates that the money form of commodities is only the further development of the simple form of value – i.e., of the expression of the value of one commodity in some other commodity taken at random; for he says:

5 beds = 1 house – (clinai pente anti oiciaς)

is not to be distinguished from

5 beds = so much money. – (clinai pente anti ... oson ai pente clinai)

He further sees that the value relation which gives rise to this expression makes it necessary that the house should qualitatively be made the equal of the bed, and that, without such an equalisation, these two clearly different things could not be compared with each other as commensurable quantities. “Exchange,” he says, “cannot take place without equality, and equality not without commensurability". (out isothς mh oushς snmmetriaς). Here, however, he comes to a stop, and gives up the further analysis of the form of value. “It is, however, in reality, impossible (th men oun alhqeia adunaton), that such unlike things can be commensurable” – i.e., qualitatively equal. Such an equalisation can only be something foreign to their real nature, consequently only “a makeshift for practical purposes.”

Aristotle therefore, himself, tells us what barred the way to his further analysis; it was the absence of any concept of value. What is that equal something, that common substance, which admits of the value of the beds being expressed by a house? Such a thing, in truth, cannot exist, says Aristotle. And why not? Compared with the beds, the house does represent something equal to them, in so far as it represents what is really equal, both in the beds and the house. And that is – human labour.

There was, however, an important fact which prevented Aristotle from seeing that, to attribute value to commodities, is merely a mode of expressing all labour as equal human labour, and consequently as labour of equal quality. Greek society was founded upon slavery, and had, therefore, for its natural basis, the inequality of men and of their labour powers. The secret of the expression of value, namely, that all kinds of labour are equal and equivalent, because, and so far as they are human labour in general, cannot be deciphered, until the notion of human equality has already acquired the fixity of a popular prejudice. This, however, is possible only in a society in which the great mass of the produce of labour takes the form of commodities, in which, consequently, the dominant relation between man and man, is that of owners of commodities. The brilliancy of Aristotle’s genius is shown by this alone, that he discovered, in the expression of the value of commodities, a relation of equality. The peculiar conditions of the society in which he lived, alone prevented him from discovering what, “in truth,” was at the bottom of this equality.
4. The Elementary Form of value considered as a whole

The elementary form of value of a commodity is contained in the equation, expressing its value relation to another commodity of a different kind, or in its exchange relation to the same. The value of commodity A, is qualitatively expressed, by the fact that commodity B is directly exchangeable with it. Its value is quantitatively expressed by the fact, that a definite quantity of B is exchangeable with a definite quantity of A. In other words, the value of a commodity obtains independent and definite expression, by taking the form of exchange value. When, at the beginning of this chapter, we said, in common parlance, that a commodity is both a use value and an exchange value, we were, accurately speaking, wrong. A commodity is a use value or object of utility, and a value. It manifests itself as this twofold thing, that it is, as soon as its value assumes an independent form – viz., the form of exchange value. It never assumes this form when isolated, but only when placed in a value or exchange relation with another commodity of a different kind. When once we know this, such a mode of expression does no harm; it simply serves as an abbreviation.

Our analysis has shown, that the form or expression of the value of a commodity originates in the nature of value, and not that value and its magnitude originate in the mode of their expression as exchange value. This, however, is the delusion as well of the mercantilists and their recent revivers, Ferrier, Ganilh,[23] and others, as also of their antipodes, the modern bagmen of Free-trade, such as Bastiat. The mercantilists lay special stress on the qualitative aspect of the expression of value, and consequently on the equivalent form of commodities, which attains its full perfection in money. The modern hawkers of Free-trade, who must get rid of their article at any price, on the other hand, lay most stress on the quantitative aspect of the relative form of value. For them there consequently exists neither value, nor magnitude of value, anywhere except in its expression by means of the exchange relation of commodities, that is, in the daily list of prices current. Macleod, who has taken upon himself to dress up the confused ideas of Lombard Street in the most learned finery, is a successful cross between the superstitious mercantilists, and the enlightened Free-trade bagmen.

A close scrutiny of the expression of the value of A in terms of B, contained in the equation expressing the value relation of A to B, has shown us that, within that relation, the bodily form of A figures only as a use value, the bodily form of B only as the form or aspect of value. The opposition or contrast existing internally in each commodity between use value and value, is, therefore, made evident externally by two commodities being placed in such relation to each other, that the commodity whose value it is sought to express, figures directly as a mere use value, while the commodity in which that value is to be expressed, figures directly as mere exchange value. Hence the elementary form of value of a commodity is the elementary form in which the contrast contained in that commodity, between use value and value, becomes apparent.

Every product of labour is, in all states of society, a use value; but it is only at a definite historical epoch in a society’s development that such a product becomes a commodity, viz., at the epoch when the labour spent on the production of a useful article becomes expressed as one of the objective qualities of that article, i.e., as its value. It therefore follows that the elementary value form is also the primitive form under which a product of labour appears historically as a commodity, and that the gradual transformation of such products into commodities, proceeds pari passu with the development of the value form.

We perceive, at first sight, the deficiencies of the elementary form of value: it is a mere germ, which must undergo a series of metamorphoses before it can ripen into the price form.

The expression of the value of commodity A in terms of any other commodity B, merely distinguishes the value from the use value of A, and therefore places A merely in a relation of exchange with a single different commodity, B; but it is still far from expressing A’s qualitative equality, and quantitative proportionality, to all commodities. To the elementary relative value form of a commodity, there corresponds the single equivalent form of one other commodity. Thus, in the relative expression of value of the linen, the coat assumes the form of equivalent, or of being directly exchangeable, only in relation to a single commodity, the linen.

Nevertheless, the elementary form of value passes by an easy transition into a more complete form. It is true that by means of the elementary form, the value of a commodity A, becomes expressed in terms of one, and only one, other commodity. But that one may be a commodity of any kind, coat, iron, corn, or anything else. Therefore, according as A is placed in relation with one or the other, we get for one and the same commodity, different elementary expressions of value.[24] The number of such possible expressions is limited only by the number of the different kinds of commodities distinct from it. The isolated expression of A’s value, is therefore convertible into a series, prolonged to any length, of the different elementary expressions of that value.

B. Total or Expanded Form of value

z Com. A = u Com. B or v Com. C or = w Com. D or = Com. E or = &c.
(20 yards of linen = 1 coat or = 10 lbs tea or = 40 lbs. coffee or
= 1 quarter corn or = 2 ounces gold or = ½ ton iron or = &c.)

1. The Expanded Relative form of value

The value of a single commodity, the linen, for example, is now expressed in terms of numberless other elements of the world of commodities. Every other commodity now becomes a mirror of the linen’s value.[25] It is thus, that for the first time, this value shows itself in its true light as a congelation of undifferentiated human labour. For the labour that creates it, now stands expressly revealed, as labour that ranks equally with every other sort of human labour, no matter what its form, whether tailoring, ploughing, mining, &c., and no matter, therefore, whether it is realised in coats, corn, iron, or gold. The linen, by virtue of the form of its value, now stands in a social relation, no longer with only one other kind of commodity, but with the whole world of commodities. As a commodity, it is a citizen of that world. At the same time, the interminable series of value equations implies, that as regards the value of a commodity, it is a matter of indifference under what particular form, or kind, of use value it appears.

In the first form, 20 yds of linen = 1 coat, it might, for ought that otherwise appears, be pure accident, that these two commodities are exchangeable in definite quantities. In the second form, on the contrary, we perceive at once the background that determines, and is essentially different from, this accidental appearance. The value of the linen remains unaltered in magnitude, whether expressed in coats, coffee, or iron, or in numberless different commodities, the property of as many different owners. The accidental relation between two individual commodity-owners disappears. It becomes plain, that it is not the exchange of commodities which regulates the magnitude of their value; but, on the contrary, that it is the magnitude of their value which controls their exchange proportions.

2. The particular Equivalent form

Each commodity, such as, coat, tea, corn, iron, &c., figures in the expression of value of the linen, as an equivalent, and, consequently, as a thing that is value. The bodily form of each of these commodities figures now as a particular equivalent form, one out of many. In the same way the manifold concrete useful kinds of labour, embodied in these different commodities, rank now as so many different forms of the realisation, or manifestation, of undifferentiated human labour.

3. Defects of the Total or Expanded form of value

In the first place, the relative expression of value is incomplete because the series representing it is interminable. The chain of which each equation of value is a link, is liable at any moment to be lengthened by each new kind of commodity that comes into existence and furnishes the material for a fresh expression of value. In the second plac
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 10:01:41 pm
GTFO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on March 21, 2010, 10:07:54 pm
No u. That's an important piece in the history of economics right thar.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 21, 2010, 10:10:26 pm
(http://wesleying.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Grammar-Police.png)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 22, 2010, 04:27:06 am
Oh hey there.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 22, 2010, 07:22:27 am
tl;dr
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 22, 2010, 09:42:42 pm
Hello.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 22, 2010, 09:43:27 pm
Hi
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 22, 2010, 09:43:41 pm
Salut
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 22, 2010, 09:44:27 pm
o7
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 22, 2010, 10:14:25 pm
NUMA NUMA
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 22, 2010, 10:15:38 pm
SHI NO NUMA
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 23, 2010, 08:22:51 am
Numa?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 23, 2010, 08:08:50 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
tl;dr
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 23, 2010, 09:36:23 pm
who actually did read it?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 09:41:57 pm
SPAMSPAMSPAM
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 09:50:54 pm
That shit about the gold is wrong.


2 ounces of gold is, today, about £1800.  20yards of larn is still £2.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 23, 2010, 09:55:17 pm
How is it wrong, if you don't like it, don't buy it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 10:03:00 pm
I'll buy the gold for yarn.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 10:08:36 pm
I'll buy your body for 1p
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bytes on March 23, 2010, 10:11:57 pm
I... winz..?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 23, 2010, 10:12:36 pm
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 10:12:57 pm
I win THE END.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 23, 2010, 10:13:31 pm
NO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 10:14:00 pm
REIGN SUPREME!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 10:15:48 pm
<3=O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 10:17:00 pm
=P<3=)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 10:17:50 pm
lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 23, 2010, 10:18:17 pm
o~ o~ o~ <3=O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 10:18:51 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
o~ o~ o~ <3=O
wat?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 10:19:31 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
o~ o~ o~ <3=O

That better not be what i think it is.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 23, 2010, 10:19:48 pm
It is
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 10:20:29 pm
wat is it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 10:22:19 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
o~ o~ o~ <3=O

That better not be what i think it is.
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
It is

It's quite a good depiction, c'mon blaggard have guess what it is.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 10:22:58 pm
tanks?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 23, 2010, 10:23:22 pm
lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 23, 2010, 10:25:03 pm
I seriously don't know.  I'm off to bed cause I'm tired as hell.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on March 23, 2010, 10:26:37 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I seriously don't know.  I'm off to bed cause I'm tired as hell.
I think you do because you've got it sigg'd  ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 24, 2010, 07:46:10 am
I don't know what the o- o- o- means.  The other bit I do, but the o- just looks like tanks to me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 24, 2010, 08:15:42 am
I think it's sperm, amirite?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 24, 2010, 04:49:29 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
I think it's sperm, amirite?
Yeah
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 24, 2010, 08:37:00 pm
Sorta
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 24, 2010, 08:48:30 pm
Awesome

=O  o- o- o- o- <3=D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 24, 2010, 08:50:21 pm
It's
o~
not
o-
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 24, 2010, 08:53:50 pm
I shoot mine like torpedo's
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 24, 2010, 09:02:03 pm
Dammit Blaggard
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 24, 2010, 09:19:33 pm
In 15 seconds they can travel half a mile and explode on impact.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 25, 2010, 08:24:23 am
that's why any woman who gets close to you runs away
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 25, 2010, 08:26:08 am
No, that's because they shoot away on steams of jiz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 25, 2010, 08:34:10 am
Torpedoing
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 25, 2010, 08:46:32 am
Exactly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: coram_boy on March 25, 2010, 02:58:13 pm
What?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 26, 2010, 12:20:32 am
NO.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 26, 2010, 08:05:32 am
Yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: coram_boy on March 26, 2010, 03:51:00 pm
But...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill on March 26, 2010, 03:52:35 pm
what a fucktarded thread.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 27, 2010, 08:57:10 am
Quote from: "coram_boy"
But...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 27, 2010, 04:33:43 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "coram_boy"
But...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bytes on March 27, 2010, 07:02:37 pm
WWWWWWWWWWWWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Hmm, how to make the N's seem seperate...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 12:31:01 am
I propose a toast to me, the winner.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 28, 2010, 12:55:41 am
o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 28, 2010, 07:29:15 am
/o
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bytes on March 28, 2010, 04:14:13 pm
/o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 28, 2010, 06:00:24 pm
o
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 06:03:10 pm
o7
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 28, 2010, 06:05:50 pm
wave o o/ /o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 06:07:37 pm
Mexican wave o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/ o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on March 28, 2010, 06:08:28 pm
o o/ /o/ o o/ /o/ o o/ /o/ o o/ /o/ o o/ /o/ o o/ /o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 28, 2010, 09:02:04 pm
/0/ /0 /0/ /0 /0/ /0 /0/ /0 /0/ /0 /0/ /0 /0/ /0 /0/ /0
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 09:04:46 pm
=0~~~<3
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 28, 2010, 09:09:33 pm
:3
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 09:18:31 pm
:]
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 28, 2010, 09:20:42 pm
(0 o)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 09:22:55 pm
xD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 28, 2010, 09:38:20 pm
:P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 09:40:00 pm
;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: PanRagon on March 28, 2010, 09:51:29 pm
LINKIN PARK FOREVER...
I WIN =)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 09:51:55 pm
Quote from: "PanRagon"
LINKIN PARK FOREVER...
I WIN =)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 28, 2010, 11:24:27 pm
OR not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 28, 2010, 11:29:34 pm
Yes, unless your Jake who likes some shitty rap
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 29, 2010, 12:25:32 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Yes, unless your Jake who likes some shitty rap
HEY!

2PAC WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN LINKIN PARK WHO SUCKS BALLZ
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 29, 2010, 01:28:24 am
TOO BAD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 01:36:06 am
I like psytrance.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 29, 2010, 02:19:01 am
TOO BAD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 29, 2010, 02:19:01 am
TOO BAD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 29, 2010, 09:18:56 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Yes, unless your Jake who likes some shitty rap
HEY!

2PAC WILL ALWAYS BE [s:m7jrcbvr]BETTER[/s:m7jrcbvr] SHITTER THAN LINKIN PARK WHO SUCKS BALLZ[/size]
Fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 29, 2010, 11:16:39 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Yes, unless your Jake who likes some shitty rap
HEY!

2PAC WILL ALWAYS BE [s:2hf69sg0]BETTER[/s:2hf69sg0] SHITTER THAN LINKIN PARK WHO SUCKS BALLZ[/size]
Fix'd
I'm willing to be £1000 that you have never listened to 2pac to edit my post like that. 2pac (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeMKM-eQPB4) in every way is better than Linkin Park (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysSxxIqKNN0).
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 29, 2010, 11:26:23 am
Well your wrong: viewtopic.php?f=78&t=28602&start=40 (http://forums.erepublik.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=78&t=28602&start=40)

Give me my 1000 pounds now.........

(http://techliberation.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/pay-up.gif)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 29, 2010, 04:02:28 pm
hmm seems my Ipod spazed when i posted here last time.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 05:13:36 pm
Let's get some black label society up in here.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 05:19:03 pm
Anythings better than rap
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 29, 2010, 05:28:20 pm
I second the motion to kill Blaggard... What? There was no such motion? Oh nevermind then.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on March 29, 2010, 05:31:08 pm
Linkin Park
-
-
EVERYTHING ELSE
-
-
Justin Beiber
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 05:32:46 pm
Quote from: "Skillz88"
Linkin Park
-
-
EVERYTHING ELSE
-
-
Justin Beiber

Linkin park?


CRAAWWWLLIINGGG IN MYYY SKINNNN, I WANT TO KILL MYSELF
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 05:36:04 pm
Everyone likes lyrics :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 29, 2010, 05:43:05 pm
Everyone?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 05:45:01 pm
Unless your welsh or gay :D  Isn't anyone going to remove that racist post :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 05:48:08 pm
Not allot of lyrics in what I listen to, the orchestra of electric.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 05:54:01 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Yes, unless your Jake who likes some shitty rap
HEY!

2PAC WILL ALWAYS BE [s:zamv7e65]BETTER[/s:zamv7e65] [s:zamv7e65]SHITTER[/s:zamv7e65] DEADER THAN LINKIN PARK [s:zamv7e65]WHO SUCKS BALLZ[/s:zamv7e65][/size]
Fix'd
Fix'd.

Also, heavy metal ftw m/
(http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs13/f/2010/003/c/b/cb3aee9860e91235184932850c501d0e.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 05:55:53 pm
flower classes of music.  Enjoy everything that isn't shit.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 05:58:11 pm
^ What he said, though Slipknot ftw
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 06:00:59 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
flower classes of music.  Enjoy everything that isn't shit.
It's called rock music
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 29, 2010, 06:04:43 pm
Alternate.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 06:05:16 pm
Never been a fan of slipknot.

Too angry.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 06:47:12 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Never been a fan of slipknot.

Too angry.
You think that's angry?
Check this out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-x95Q0SJfY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-x95Q0SJfY)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 07:14:19 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Never been a fan of slipknot.

Too angry.
You think that's angry?
Check this out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-x95Q0SJfY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-x95Q0SJfY)
That's powerchords, fast drumming and pig squilling.

Slipknot have some talent.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 07:14:54 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Never been a fan of slipknot.

Too angry.
You think that's angry?
Check this out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-x95Q0SJfY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-x95Q0SJfY)
That's powerchords, fast drumming and pig squilling.

Slipknot have some talent.
inorite
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 07:17:05 pm
If I wanted anger I could look back to limp bizkit.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:09:46 pm
Limp Bizkit aren't that angry
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:12:10 pm
They are the unevolved form of scremo.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:16:28 pm
They are no where like screamo
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 29, 2010, 08:20:55 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Well your wrong: viewtopic.php?f=78&t=28602&start=40 (http://forums.erepublik.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=78&t=28602&start=40)

Give me my 1000 pounds now.........

(http://techliberation.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/pay-up.gif)
Where does it say it's worse than Linkin Park?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:25:06 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
They are no where like screamo
Like bulbasaur is not venusuar.

Both ugly but evolved from it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:26:15 pm
No. Limp Bizkit are Nu/Rap-Metal. This evolved from Hip Hop and Metal. Screamo evolved from hardcore. They're completely unrelated.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:27:18 pm
N'ah man, I know because it is fact.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:27:56 pm
Where did you get this idea from?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 29, 2010, 08:29:06 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
No. Limp Bizkit are Nu/Rap-Metal. This evolved from Hip Hop and Metal. Screamo evolved from hardcore. They're completely unrelated.
Not really, no. Screamo and Nu/Rap-Metal may have different roots, but kind of intertwined with one another.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:29:51 pm
fact != idea

fact == fact
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:33:17 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
No. Limp Bizkit are Nu/Rap-Metal. This evolved from Hip Hop and Metal. Screamo evolved from hardcore. They're completely unrelated.
Not really, no. Screamo and Nu/Rap-Metal may have different roots, but kind of intertwined with one another.
They came about at around the same time but they're still different
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:34:16 pm
Nu metal and such came along 1980's and early 1990's.  

Screamo is a 21st century style.

Crabcore is where it's at though.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:35:03 pm
Nu Metal came long 90s
Screamo came along late 90s I'd think
Crabcore, wtf
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:36:48 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQVpITyO ... r_embedded (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQVpITyOdc8&feature=player_embedded)

Fucking identical crabs man.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:40:31 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQVpITyOdc8&feature=player_embedded

Fucking identical crabs man.
Noice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjXLETFniE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjXLETFniE)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:42:28 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQVpITyOdc8&feature=player_embedded

Fucking identical crabs man.
Noice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjXLETFniE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjXLETFniE)
my link is suppose to be a joke.

They are all identical, and they look like crabs.

Thus, crabcore.

You're link was onto something good and then he started singing.
Also: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Crabcore (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Crabcore)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:43:48 pm
The song's good though.


:| TDEP are fucking amazing


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVH8Ac8jB5Q (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVH8Ac8jB5Q)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:46:38 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jszQ3KF7zxQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jszQ3KF7zxQ)

That's more like something I'll listen too.

Except with my Phillips HTS6600 500wat 2.1 set.

Played at half volume and the people 4 stories below me are complaining about cutlery dancing cause of the base.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:50:37 pm
Favourite song of all time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wws7mnMewPw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wws7mnMewPw)

Electronica's pretty cool too
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 08:51:32 pm
I prefer duality
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:52:24 pm
Best video of all time:
http://visit-x.net/CAMS/US/specials/Rammstein.html (http://visit-x.net/CAMS/US/specials/Rammstein.html)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:53:05 pm
Duality is my 2nd favourite. It was 1st until Psychosocial came out and I was like

":OOOOOOO <3333333333333"
Thing is, I only heard it a bit right before I was going to leave for holiday for about a month. So I could only get it a month later.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:53:22 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Best video of all time:
http://visit-x.net/CAMS/US/specials/Rammstein.html (http://visit-x.net/CAMS/US/specials/Rammstein.html)
Lemme guess, Pussy?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:54:48 pm
How old are slipknot now anyway?

Must be rich as flower being in the business as long as they have.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on March 29, 2010, 08:56:15 pm
Depends. They got big just over 10 years ago, but they were first formed almost 20 years ago. Never made much money before their debut though. 10 years isn't that long compared to some. Black Sabbath were formed in '69, Aerosmith even earlier
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 08:57:03 pm
After listening to Psychosocial i need to play on guitar hero.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 08:57:59 pm
After listening to my System Nipel pystrance I want to take some mandy and use my living room as a rave

Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Best video of all time:
http://visit-x.net/CAMS/US/specials/Rammstein.html (http://visit-x.net/CAMS/US/specials/Rammstein.html)
Lemme guess, Pussy?


Yup.

Even better is that they had it on kerrang once and after the first minute it was just a black screen.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 08:58:53 pm
There's a time and a place, a monday night is neither.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 09:01:45 pm
Monday night is programming night.

Programming night requires drink, whores and drugs.

How else am I suppose to program?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 09:02:35 pm
Sober?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 09:07:26 pm
Programming?

A computer?

Sober?

This is what I'm trying to fix

This is what I have do fix later:


FUN FOR THE WHOLE SOBER FAMILY!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 09:46:02 pm
WHAT THE flower IS THAT SHIT
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 09:48:24 pm
The reason I drink
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 09:49:29 pm
Fair enough after that shit
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 29, 2010, 09:50:26 pm
I find that if you look for reasons to drink other than you like to be drunk...

oh wait, I don't actually have a witty comment for that.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 09:52:55 pm
Bear in mind for the first example of code I had to write 5 more "classes" like it.

The second one I had to write 4 more classes like it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 10:14:08 pm
I've got 4 essays in two days, well one now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 10:16:07 pm
I've got more code to program and 7 10 page essays with a 50 page group project due in 4 weeks.

Immense.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 10:20:34 pm
You win, i take it your at uni or something
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 10:21:59 pm
Ai last year, computer science leaning on Software development.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on March 29, 2010, 10:24:19 pm
Sounds......errrr....interesting
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 29, 2010, 10:25:30 pm
You see, we do this which means that this does that and THAT does THIS!

COMPLICATED?

N'ah, just fucktons of it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 30, 2010, 09:23:06 am
What did I miss?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 30, 2010, 02:28:29 pm
EVERYTHING!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 30, 2010, 05:52:17 pm
Turns out, mike kelly is a he she.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 30, 2010, 11:38:11 pm
Already knew that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 30, 2010, 11:42:41 pm
How?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 30, 2010, 11:57:59 pm
Because I'm not an Adderist o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 31, 2010, 01:51:16 am
Still no idea what it is.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 02:29:55 am
Define "it"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 03:01:27 am
D:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 03:03:08 am
????
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 03:05:20 am
Blag thinks I'm a he she for some reason. (I don't think he likes me)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 03:08:46 am
Quote from: "Mike Kelley"
(I don't think he likes me)
O rly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 03:20:20 am
Just a thought.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 03:24:08 am
Probs correct too
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 03:27:39 am
Hmm... Not sure though. Maybe we should ask him :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 03:29:05 am
That's your job
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 03:30:27 am
He will probobly just cuss at me and run off anyways.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 03:43:20 am
Ahhh... haven't heard the word cuss for ages
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 03:45:22 am
Oh do the ausi's not say "cuss"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 03:47:24 am
No idea, I just never hear it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 03:53:01 am
I picked it up from an American friend of mine.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 03:56:52 am
And did he come from one of the southern states?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 04:00:48 am
He came from West Virginia.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 31, 2010, 04:17:02 am
Quote from: "Mike Kelley"
Blag thinks I'm a he she for some reason. (I don't think he likes me)
Mike = He

Kelly = She

He-She.

I dislike you because you are unable to find my more "extreme" humour funny.
Until you can read this article and find it funny as hell and actively participate in the humour expressed within it, I don't think I'll be able to stop calling you he-she

---
infact I'll remove the link because I'll probably get banned for linking to it.  If you want it PM me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 04:25:15 am
Nah I think I'll be good.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Chris Stanwick on March 31, 2010, 05:34:28 am
And...win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 09:16:03 am
O rly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 31, 2010, 10:56:07 am
(http://jamiedubs.com/fuckflickr/data/web/ya-rly.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: coram_boy on March 31, 2010, 11:13:35 am
zzzzzzzzzzzz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on March 31, 2010, 02:38:04 pm
NO SLEEPY FOR YOU!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 10:55:56 pm
Not any more anyway, just got up
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on March 31, 2010, 10:58:12 pm
got up to no good  :twisted:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 11:04:35 pm
Yea boyz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 31, 2010, 11:15:08 pm
whaa
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on March 31, 2010, 11:21:26 pm
winrar1
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 11:24:17 pm
Winzip
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on March 31, 2010, 11:32:31 pm
(http://picasion.com/pic19/0d0a0e42098a53dd3304b43fd9e15941.gif)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 11:35:13 pm
Jake likes white stuff on his face
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on March 31, 2010, 11:41:26 pm
Man stuff
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on March 31, 2010, 11:44:57 pm
Tots broseph
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 01, 2010, 01:04:44 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
Jake likes white stuff on his face
Yeah, the foam from soap. I like my face to be clean for my girlfriend :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 01, 2010, 03:22:34 am
Sure you do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 01, 2010, 03:31:15 am
Why wouldn't I? I don't want her to break up with me because I don't wash my face... that'll suck major ass
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 01, 2010, 03:32:24 am
Face washing is very important.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 01, 2010, 04:12:00 am
OFC
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 02:17:21 am
I wash my face with soap and shampoo and water.

Soap because it's soap.

Shampoo because I wash my hair.

Water because anything else wouldn't make me clean.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 02:31:24 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I wash my face with soap and shampoo and water.

Soap because it's soap.

Shampoo because I wash my hair.

Water because anything else wouldn't make me clean.
Good input
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar on April 04, 2010, 02:31:49 am
Quite. :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 02:33:02 am
It's what Blaggard does best
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 02:57:20 am
I'm full of useful information.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 03:01:07 am
And creepy avatars
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:07:30 am
how is it creepy?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 03:09:16 am
Let's see there is a smiling baby face where genitals should be.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:11:09 am
So you find it creepy that there are no male genitals to be seen?

Tell me, were you ever attracted to your mother?  If so, when and why?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 03:20:15 am
/me facepalm

it is not that a lack of genitels is creepy it is that a there is a baby face where they should be. It would not be so creepy if you had a loin cloth there instead of a baby face for example.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 03:21:19 am
lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:24:33 am
Quote from: "Mike Kelley"
/me facepalm

it is not that a lack of genitels is creepy it is that a there is a baby face where they should be. It would not be so creepy if you had a loin cloth there instead of a baby face for example.
It creates babies, what's bad about a baby face?

If you ever watched the video I linked endlessly, you would find out that the baby crotch is the saviour of the forest.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 03:26:41 am
Ok I give up it seems he is too far lost.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:29:05 am
Watch the bloody video and all will be understood.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Ultima ... ler_Legend (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Ultimate_Muscle_Roller_Legend)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 03:35:10 am
CYMRAEG DICTER!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:36:36 am
WHA?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 03:37:24 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Watch the bloody video and all will be understood.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Ultima ... ler_Legend (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Ultimate_Muscle_Roller_Legend)
NOOOOOOOOOOOO I WILL NOT
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:39:58 am
srsly, it's fucking awesome.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 03:44:22 am
Remember the last time I clicked on a link you gave me...........
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:45:57 am
Yeah, this one is safe.

If it's not safe (enough for work) I will give you 50gbp.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 03:46:56 am
Defnyddiwch ffwl cyfieithydd google!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:49:23 am
Quote from: "Mike Kelley"
Defnyddiwch ffwl cyfieithydd google!
http://translate.google.com/#cy|en|Defn ... cyfieithyd (http://translate.google.com/#cy|en|Defnyddiwch%20ffwl%20cyfieithyd)

Fag learn to speak welsh.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 03:53:55 am
Hey i'm learning
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 03:55:41 am
You're welsh and even google can speak it better than you.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 04:01:49 am
Just because I am Welsh does not mean I automaticly have perfect knoledge of Welsh. I still have to learn it as you would any other launguedge.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 04:04:05 am
Oh, so the national language of Wales is either baby talk or English?

Welsh is dead and the welsh should give up on it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 04:08:37 am
Hey you forgot the second 'd' in cyfieithydd that's why it didn't work. And it is unlikely that it would actualy get the order of the words right anyways.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 04:10:02 am
Took you long enough to find it.  What are those welsh teachers teaching you?  Scottish?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 04:13:04 am
Oh sorry for not finding your mistake.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 04:13:43 am
My mistake?  
Took you a while to find it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 04:16:09 am
At least i can copy and paste unlike some people.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 04:17:50 am
You still think I did it by mistake?

haw haw, learn to speak welsh and pick up on the error straight away.

I be trollin the he she welshy baby.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 06:47:52 am
What did I miss?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 11:58:02 am
EVERYTHING!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:05:52 pm
Specifically?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:07:36 pm
EVERYTHING!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:08:09 pm
So specifically I've missed everything
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:08:34 pm
YEAH EVERYTHING!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:12:06 pm
O rly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:12:27 pm
YEAH
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:13:32 pm
I disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:14:47 pm
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:16:32 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:17:02 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:17:19 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:18:01 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:19:53 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:20:34 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:23:18 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:24:06 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:26:53 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:28:48 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:32:43 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:35:38 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:36:06 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:36:46 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 12:42:17 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:42:57 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 12:43:36 pm
Stop
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 12:44:53 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i disagree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 04, 2010, 01:18:48 pm
Quote from: "Mike Kelley"
Stop
NOOOOOO
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 04, 2010, 01:36:59 pm
I agree
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 02:15:09 pm
I digress
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 04, 2010, 04:54:46 pm
I leave.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 05:24:36 pm
Why?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 04, 2010, 05:59:14 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
EVERYTHING!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 04, 2010, 07:26:51 pm
Yhw?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 12:04:13 am
Yet again, what did I miss?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: bowen199 on April 05, 2010, 12:05:21 am
the post after the next post wins
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 12:40:33 am
I see, but that's assuming someone doesn't post after the next post
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 12:43:05 am
You seem to be correct
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 12:57:05 am
I do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 12:57:51 am
Maybe...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 12:59:36 am
O rly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 01:00:40 am
No.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 02:56:19 am
Yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 02:59:09 am
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 02:59:58 am
lol?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 03:00:51 am
Night my aussie friend ( i will regret saying that in the morning, but i'm sleep deprived)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 03:01:35 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
lol?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 03:15:47 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Night my aussie friend ( i will regret saying that in the morning, but i'm sleep deprived)
Night mon cher
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 03:17:03 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
lol?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 03:21:39 am
I see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 03:31:41 am
God damn spammers.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 03:32:22 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
God damn spammers.
You're one to talk :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 03:35:10 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
God damn spammers.
You're one to talk :P
He does often, very often
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 03:38:08 am
Ai I do talk yet you two push the envelope on the spamming.  

I
new post
want
new post

Blah blah blah.  More annoying than topic spam because it's the sneaky way of doing the same stupid thing.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 03:45:58 am
I only ever do it in that thread, because that's was how that thread was started...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 03:48:58 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
I only ever do it in that thread, because that's was how that thread was started...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 04:13:33 am
sure
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 04:15:42 am
Btw who's seeing Death at a Funeral (http://www.deathatafuneral-movie.com/?hs308=DAF103) on the 16th?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 04:22:22 am
Trailor makes it seem shit.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 04:23:37 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Trailor makes it fucking hilarious.
Fix'd.

Why would it be shit?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 04:26:45 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Btw who's seeing Death at a Funeral (http://www.deathatafuneral-movie.com/?hs308=DAF103) on the 16th?
Not me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 04:27:52 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Trailor makes it fucking hilarious.
Fix'd.

Why would it be shit?

Cause my definition of shit is probably more elitist than yours.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 04:29:57 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Trailor makes it fucking hilarious.
Fix'd.

Why would it be shit?

Cause my definition of shit is probably more elitist than yours.
Is it a racist definition o.O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 04:35:53 am
What is his definition?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 05:21:00 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Fix'd.

Why would it be shit?

Cause my definition of shit is probably more elitist than yours.
Is it a racist definition o.O

Wat

If I were being racist I would be blunt with it.  However I've never judged any works on the basis of racial profiling; the end result being all I care about.  I don't give a flying flower what did it, I'll judge them based on what they actually produced.

I believe my opinion to be more elitist than yours because this is an example of Sitcom made into a film.  Something you apparently enjoy.

I see no reason to enjoy it's washed out characters and bland jokes with obvious plots and no depth to any story.  With these taken into consideration I believe my opinion to be more restrictive and therefore being only able to enjoy a smaller range of things, more elitist.

Elitist wine tasters won't drink £5 bottles, elitist foot critics won't eat a macdonalds.  This is the same thing but with movies instead of foods and drinks.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 07:10:22 am
I was kidding :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 07:39:10 am
Sure you were
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 02:34:46 pm
Well, you get the picture now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 05, 2010, 02:58:37 pm
The 5th post after this loses
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 03:02:13 pm
I don't get it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 05, 2010, 03:04:43 pm
You're a twit
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 03:07:01 pm
Why am I?  I don't understand the rules.  Surely the person to post last will win, yet you throw down the guantlet saying it'll be the 4th from your post.

I counteract that by saying the next post loses.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 05, 2010, 03:24:32 pm
Fine, I lose. But the post after this does too. So STFU or you will suffer the pain of loss too.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 04:11:38 pm
Your evil trick Avlana won't work :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 05, 2010, 04:12:53 pm
I WANT TO GET OUT OF THIS NIGHTMARE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on April 05, 2010, 06:07:05 pm
There is no way out of this nightmare.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on April 05, 2010, 06:08:09 pm
except by winning which I currently am.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 06:09:31 pm
Not :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on April 05, 2010, 06:20:57 pm
Exactly my point.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 05, 2010, 06:39:58 pm
HOW DO I GET THIS THREAD OFF MY 'VIEW YOUR POSTS' THING??
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 07:21:07 pm
You can't :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 09:03:20 pm
Well, you can ask a mod to delete all your posts.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 09:30:55 pm
Or you can just delete all board cookies
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 09:33:53 pm

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 09:34:21 pm
wat no that won't work.  That'll just log him off.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 09:35:43 pm
I hate you Blaggard for putting the other thing in your sig :cry:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 09:37:04 pm
I can always change it at a later date.  I could have it al in my sig I think.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 09:49:24 pm
Nice. /me likes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 09:50:16 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Nice. /me likes
I can also add that.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 09:56:05 pm
do eet
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 09:59:47 pm
Isn't as good as the begging though.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 10:02:48 pm
Maybe....
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 10:19:06 pm
Well, you're begging me now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:21:58 pm
Don't give consent to Bewick!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 10:24:00 pm
Both of you beg me for things.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:24:32 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Both of you beg me for things.
That's what she said
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 10:27:14 pm
Yeah, she being your GF.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:30:52 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Yeah, she being your GF.
flower off
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 10:33:05 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Yeah, she being your GF.

I lol'd  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:39:14 pm
She's gonna kill me, and I don't know what to do. I had the wrong topic opened :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 10:40:55 pm
Good i hope she rips you penis off.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 10:41:02 pm
Oh rly?  What topic did you have open?  The incest one?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:43:08 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Oh rly?  What topic did you have open?  The incest one?
No. The one where I was talking about her. Just checked. She raped the topic (and really dissed you)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 10:45:00 pm
Alex put you gf back on i liked her ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 10:45:13 pm
You, posing as her, called me a "creeper".

Fucking scared.

What I am wondering about is whether you tapping that 15 year old ass in america where the Age of Consent is 18 or marriage.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:47:11 pm
I'm 15 too lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 10:47:33 pm
So you're raping each other?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 10:49:22 pm
There both 5
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:49:38 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
So you're raping each other?
It's not rape if you enjoy it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 10:50:07 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
There both 5
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 10:51:33 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
So you're raping each other?
It's not rape if you enjoy it
It's rape when you don't say yes.  You cannot say yes if you're under the age of consent.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:51:50 pm
Aww...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 05, 2010, 10:53:22 pm
Jake you criminal, you should move to peejik land
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 10:57:35 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Jake you criminal, you should move to peejik land
I lol'd (but too scared to call my gf)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 10:59:36 pm
I see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 11:03:53 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
I see
You wouldn't know. You just woke up
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 11:05:26 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Jake you criminal, you should move to peejik land
I lol'd (but too scared to call my gf)
Scared?

I'll call her for you.  My british accent is sure to charm her into fucking you.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 11:10:04 pm
lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 11:11:48 pm
"Hello Lass, I'm Alex's friend.  He told me that you're angry at him, so I want to invite you to spend some time with me to relax and unwind.  You need a shoulder to cry on, someone to let all your feelings on out.  I'll do that, lass, I'll do it good."
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 05, 2010, 11:12:45 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
"Hello Lass, I'm Alex's friend.  He told me that you're angry at him, so I want to invite you to spend some time with me to relax and unwind.  You need a shoulder to cry on, someone to let all your feelings on out.  I'll do that, lass, I'll do it good."
Shuddup. You don't even know her name
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 11:13:38 pm
She'll tell me, with time.  Hell, I don't even need to know it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 05, 2010, 11:50:38 pm
/me lol'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 05, 2010, 11:52:01 pm
You don't even need to know her name and I'll let you join in.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 12:07:27 am
I see...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 06, 2010, 12:08:39 am
Btw we just broke it up. She was being a bitch when I talked with her just now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 06, 2010, 12:11:30 am
ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL JIZZ
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 12:11:44 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Btw we just broke it up. She was being a bitch when I talked with her just now.
/me commiserates my dear sir
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 06, 2010, 12:23:50 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Btw we just broke it up. She was being a bitch when I talked with her just now.
So you never had a gf?

15 year old girls are the most slutty dude, she was fucking someone else with you as the relationship.  All you have to do it give them attention and they'll jump all over it (albeit like a ammeuter).
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 06, 2010, 12:24:35 am
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lando Khan on April 06, 2010, 12:27:21 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Btw we just broke it up. She was being a bitch when I talked with her just now.
So you never had a gf?

15 year old girls are the most slutty dude, she was fucking someone else with you as the relationship.  All you have to do it give them attention and they'll jump all over it (albeit like a ammeuter).
Oh god you are talking about it here too?

Christ, why not make a dedicated relationship thread for this stuff?  :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 12:30:55 am
Jake should make one
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 06, 2010, 01:02:48 am
I should make one to give away all the important information in life.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lando Khan on April 06, 2010, 01:06:11 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I should make one to give away all the important information in life.
It will be a short one then
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 06, 2010, 01:08:36 am
Or not b/c I fooled you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 06, 2010, 01:14:07 am
I've been critising it all along you dolt.  I said I knew it was you and I've been doubting you because srsly, what 15 y/o bitch would rage at a thread?  Not one.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 01:14:37 am
I see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 06, 2010, 01:15:48 am
srsly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 06, 2010, 01:35:15 am
YA! Blaggard = genius without a doubt

Everyone else (with probably 3 exceptions) = retards
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lando Khan on April 06, 2010, 01:36:15 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
YA! Blaggard = genius without a doubt

Everyone else (with probably 3 exceptions) = retards
I demand a list of everyone  :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 06, 2010, 01:36:47 am
Not really you fag, you make shit up about having a gf and breaking up, posting a retarded msg from then thinking up a lam excuse, it's rather sad actually.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Stu Beard on April 06, 2010, 01:37:04 am
/me is reatrd.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lando Khan on April 06, 2010, 01:37:49 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Not really you fag, you make shit up about having a gf and breaking up, posting a retarded msg from then thinking up a lam excuse, it's rather sad actually.
This has potential for an arguement thread.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 06, 2010, 01:37:54 am
I expect that you think that you're one of the exceptions...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 01:47:13 am
Quote from: "Stu Beard"
/me is reatrd.
I lemoned
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Stu Beard on April 06, 2010, 01:53:52 am
/me licks
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 06, 2010, 02:06:19 am
Oh god you lot lick each other?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Stu Beard on April 06, 2010, 02:14:16 am
Licking on lemon.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar on April 06, 2010, 02:14:55 am
Postan'.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 06, 2010, 02:16:45 am
Quote from: "Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar"
Postan'.
I read that as "prostrating".
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 04:14:29 am
Quote from: "Stu Beard"
/me licks
/me licks back
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on April 06, 2010, 06:14:57 am
Purple or orange?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 07:52:09 am
Orange
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 06, 2010, 01:13:11 pm
What does Delete All Board Cookies do? Cos I clicked it once and I don't think it was good
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 06, 2010, 01:18:57 pm
I think it gets rid of your remembered username and password or something like that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 06, 2010, 08:22:17 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
What does Delete All Board Cookies do? Cos I clicked it once and I don't think it was good
Don't consider it. It's like Pandora's box, if you click on it (instead of open it), all the evils of the world will take over the world :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: The B on April 06, 2010, 08:50:09 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
What does Delete All Board Cookies do? Cos I clicked it once and I don't think it was good
Don't consider it. It's like Pandora's box, if you click on it (instead of open it), all the evils of the world will take over the world :ugeek:
Where is that button?
Must...find...button...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 06, 2010, 10:35:14 pm
Quote from: "The B"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
What does Delete All Board Cookies do? Cos I clicked it once and I don't think it was good
Don't consider it. It's like Pandora's box, if you click on it (instead of open it), all the evils of the world will take over the world :ugeek:
Where is that button?
Must...find...button...
Bottom right of the page.

Seriously, what does it do?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lando Khan on April 06, 2010, 10:41:56 pm
There is only one way to find out and I suggest you all pick straws with the shortest clicking the button.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 06, 2010, 10:44:42 pm
Quote from: "Lando Khan"
There is only one way to find out and I suggest you all pick straws with the shortest clicking the button.
I've already clicked it but I'm not sure what happened
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on April 07, 2010, 12:32:43 am
You can't escape this...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 07, 2010, 12:46:33 am
Quote from: "Baron von Awesome"
You can't escape this...
The Baron of Awesomeness is right
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 07, 2010, 06:49:24 am
He is
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 07, 2010, 12:27:43 pm
FUFUFUFFUFUFUFUFUFUFUFUFUFUFUFU
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on April 07, 2010, 12:30:10 pm
Each time you click on THE BUTTON, it deletes a part of your SOUL.
Your SOUL is not immortal, it will eventually DIE.
But THE BUTTON is always there, tempting you.

Can you resist THE BUTTON?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 07, 2010, 12:30:36 pm
No I cannot resist the button
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 07, 2010, 08:23:38 pm
Quote from: "Skillz88"
Each time you click on THE BUTTON, it deletes a part of your SOUL.
Your SOUL is not immortal, it will eventually DIE.
But THE BUTTON is always there, tempting you.

Can you resist THE BUTTON?
I can :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 07, 2010, 08:36:03 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Skillz88"
Each time you click on THE BUTTON, it deletes a part of your SOUL.
Your SOUL is not immortal, it will eventually DIE.
But THE BUTTON is always there, tempting you.

Can you resist THE BUTTON?
I can :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 08, 2010, 12:16:33 am
But you didn't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 08, 2010, 01:30:33 am
(http://robertsravings.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/barack-obama-yes-we-can-posters.jpg)



























Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 08, 2010, 01:37:04 am
/me isn't pissed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 08, 2010, 01:42:34 am
Awwwwwwwww :evil:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 08, 2010, 01:54:38 am
XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 08, 2010, 02:03:29 am
Stupid Aussie....
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 08, 2010, 02:28:57 am
American't amirite?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 08, 2010, 03:55:13 am
Bloody pillocks.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 08, 2010, 04:36:11 am
pillocks?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: camcam on April 08, 2010, 03:07:34 pm
i win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 03:08:29 pm
No you don't :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 08, 2010, 03:21:09 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
No you don't :P
But his avatar does.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 08, 2010, 08:12:58 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
No you don't :P
But his avatar does.
Agreed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 08:58:22 pm
You all bum each other in the showers, don't you?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:09:17 pm
Are you asking me or them?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:11:02 pm
Everyone except me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:11:55 pm
k Sean
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:12:48 pm
Oh rly?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:13:23 pm
yh rly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:18:56 pm
ya
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:25:55 pm
k
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:28:26 pm
Awesome
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:29:04 pm
Really awesome or just awesome
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:29:42 pm
It's just a offhand comment, doesn't mean anything.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:31:13 pm
But why
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:33:05 pm
I wanted to impress your pants into your mouth.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:33:53 pm
k try again
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:37:53 pm
I'm impressing you with my impressing skills.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:38:42 pm
oh i do say, i'm impressed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:40:05 pm
Pants in mouth?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:42:02 pm
yh ima ready
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:45:00 pm
haw haw you have your shit stained panties in your mouthies.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:48:15 pm
Tis true, wat i'll do for love
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:49:17 pm
Dunno, what will you do?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:50:49 pm
I would do anything for love, but i won't do that.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:51:09 pm
What's that?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:51:41 pm
My feelings
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:52:52 pm
Man you're such a bore.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 09:55:46 pm
:|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 09:59:39 pm
Dude we should totally meet up and touch each other.  I think It'd go well.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 10:00:38 pm
:|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:01:25 pm
;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 10:03:42 pm
:D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:06:59 pm
:O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 10:07:37 pm
hmmmm
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:08:27 pm
So, wanna funk?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on April 08, 2010, 10:14:00 pm
I slappa de bass.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:15:52 pm
yeah man that makes as much sense as a trout in water.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on April 08, 2010, 10:17:39 pm
...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:19:29 pm
It should be on my plate.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 10:40:07 pm
How fishist
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:40:57 pm
A fishy on my dishy.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 10:41:47 pm
when the boats come in
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:43:00 pm
i bought it for a dollah fidy
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 08, 2010, 10:52:15 pm
o rly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 08, 2010, 10:53:33 pm
dolla FIDY!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 09, 2010, 01:59:27 am
no
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 02:10:31 am
yes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 02:12:18 am
one dorrah
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 02:29:47 am
two dorrah
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: bowen199 on April 09, 2010, 02:29:54 am
This game still going?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 02:32:14 am
As I said before, you can never win (face it - it'll be a mod who wins if anyone)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 02:37:34 am
But then another mod could still post in the thread =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 02:44:12 am
It'll be a battle of the mods
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 02:50:33 am
A sight to behold
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 02:51:09 am
Agreed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 03:13:25 am
That'll be gay.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 03:23:12 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Agreed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 03:28:55 am
Can you stop quoting yourself?  It's gay.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Mike Kelley on April 09, 2010, 03:35:00 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Agreed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 03:42:43 am
God dammit he she.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 03:59:26 am
lolwut?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 04:42:12 am
I think he's talking about you XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 09:28:49 am
I think Jake might be a heshe too.  good eyes, peejik.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 09:40:28 am
Thank you kind sir
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 09:53:28 am
Just where are you watching anyway?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 10:01:56 am
From somewhere that no one else has ever gone =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 10:06:11 am
What are you watching?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 10:42:46 am
Everything, for I am omnipresent
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 10:44:40 am
No surprise
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 10:48:11 am
I know I'm also Omniscient
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 10:51:03 am
So do I.

O WAI....









YOU'RE FACEBOT! :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 11:04:06 am
Facebot?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 09, 2010, 12:02:06 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Facebot?
Facebot (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=facebot).
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 12:40:47 pm
=O Facebook
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Lando Khan on April 09, 2010, 12:54:14 pm
VIVA LEI VIVA LEI VIVA LEI VIVA LEI VIVA LEI VIVA LEI LEI VIVA LEI OH VIVA LEI VIVA LEI VIIIIIIIIIIVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIII
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 09, 2010, 12:55:21 pm
/me do not get
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 04:25:54 pm
You don't?  It's as clear as the bald spot on the back of your head.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 09:39:40 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Facebot?
It watches anyone and everyone, and rapes anyone on anything it's a bot on IRC
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 09:43:46 pm
Or it's a facebook trawler designed to steal personal information etc.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 09, 2010, 09:58:12 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Or it's a facebook trawler designed to steal personal information etc.
Oh, forgot about that. That too
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 10:14:27 pm
Well then.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 10:37:07 pm
*burp*
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jazzaa on April 09, 2010, 10:39:01 pm
http://www.comixconnection.com/uploaded_images/The-Joker-2-734120.jpg
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 10:40:35 pm
Quote from: "jazzaa"
http://www.comixconnection.com/uploaded_images/The-Joker-2-734120.jpg
That's interesting.  Really it is.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 10:41:08 pm
True worth spending my time on
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 10:45:17 pm
Not one second was wasted.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 10:49:21 pm
maybe a millisecond
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 10:54:03 pm
nothing at all was wasted.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 10:56:05 pm
I'll have to recheck with a stopwatch
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 10:58:24 pm
You'll waste all the time you spend experimenting.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:00:16 pm
But..... what am i to do, believe you.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:01:58 pm
Yes, you're experiments will prove me right.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:03:54 pm
maybe..... we'll never know
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:05:27 pm
I know I'm right, you'll just have to confirm it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:07:21 pm
But without confirmation, nobody else will know you're right.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:08:22 pm
You could always do the experiment however I guestimate that I'll be right.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:09:58 pm
I hate ppl who say guestimate, just say estimate.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 09, 2010, 11:12:47 pm
I kind of like the word "guestimate", having heard it for the first time just now.
It's a combo of guess and estimate ... er ... which basically is the same thing.
OK, I'm with you, stop using the word.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:15:20 pm
estimation requires some data to back up, guesses are wild shots in the dark.  A guestimation is a educated guess.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:17:02 pm
STFU AND STOP USING THAT WORD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:19:19 pm
I guestimate that you dislike it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:20:28 pm
Now you estimate, by your previous sentence you state that estimate requires some data, the data being me saying i hate ppl who say guestimate, so i guess you would estimate :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:23:39 pm
guestimate means that it's a educated guess, not just a blast in the dark.  Using experience and knowledge I guess that it will be a waste of time.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 09, 2010, 11:24:07 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
estimation requires some data to back up, guesses are wild shots in the dark.  A guestimation is a educated guess.
I'm guestimating that I'm gonna start using that word.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:25:26 pm
*slits wrists*
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:25:59 pm
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&cl ... on&spell=1 (http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&ei=Tam_S7zwM5SI0wTxgOWlCQ&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CAQQBSgA&q=define%3A+guesstimation&spell=1)

Quote
Definitions of  guesstimation on the Web:

    * Guesstimate is a portmanteau of the words guess and estimate, first used by American statisticians in 1934 or 1935. Dictionary. ...
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guesstimation

    * A pejorative term implying an estimation made without good justification and often indicating bias of some sort
      en.wiktionary.org/wiki/guesstimation

    * guesstimate - estimate based on a calculation
    * guesstimate - an estimate that combines reasoning with guessing
      wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

    * guesstimate - An estimate that is hardly any better than a guess, often because it is based on insufficient or unreliable data; To make a guesstimate; To make a guesstimate of a specific quantity
      en.wiktionary.org/wiki/guesstimate

    * guesstimate - An approximation of the cost of a project made by the cost estimator, without having performed a detailed quantity takeoff. See also educated guess.
      http://www.diydoctor.org.uk/projects/bu ... aryg12.htm (http://www.diydoctor.org.uk/projects/buildingdictionaryg12.htm)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 09, 2010, 11:32:23 pm
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... uesstimate (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=guesstimate)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 09, 2010, 11:34:03 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=guesstimate

I lol'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:37:42 pm
urbandictionary has nothing compared to my princeton, diydoctor  and wiki's.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 09, 2010, 11:48:49 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
urbandictionary has nothing compared to my princeton, diydoctor  and wiki's.
... I find it to have some of the most accurate meanings, and also (by far) the largest amount of defined "slang" words.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 09, 2010, 11:51:27 pm
But it's also heavily opinionated.  Hell, my spell checkers aren't going crazy over "Guestimate" meaning that community who's decided the dictionary's allowed it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:03:25 am
your princeton, diydoctor?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:04:20 am
My sources for the meaning of the word "Guestimate".
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:07:44 am
I see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:08:42 am
My sources are wittingly good.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 12:09:08 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*slits wrists*
Go cry, emo kid ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:12:30 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*slits wrists*
Go cry, emo kid ;)
Damn your a nasty bastard.  Ryan here is obviously in need of some help and you tell him to go and cry.  What has the world come too?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 12:20:44 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*slits wrists*
Go cry, emo kid ;)
Damn your a nasty bastard.  Ryan here is obviously in need of some help and you tell him to go and cry.  What has the world come too?
I guesstimate that he didn't really slit his wrists, and by that he could handle that little pun I made.
I also guesstimate that he will be able to handle the two puns I've made right here.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 12:22:23 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*slits wrists*
Go cry, emo kid ;)
Damn your a nasty bastard.  Ryan here is obviously in need of some help and you tell him to go and cry.  What has the world come too?

rofl, if i was emo i would be sitting in a corner right now listening to my chemical romance basking in my bloody, therefore wouldn't be able to type :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:23:44 am
He's telling Ryan to stop bottling his emotion obviously
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:33:43 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Go cry, emo kid ;)
Damn your a nasty bastard.  Ryan here is obviously in need of some help and you tell him to go and cry.  What has the world come too?
I guesstimate that he didn't really slit his wrists, and by that he could handle that little pun I made.
I also guesstimate that he will be able to handle the two puns I've made right here.
Go Kill Yourself, Emo Kid
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:44:55 am
/me thinks everyone needs to go get a carebear
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:47:28 am
Oh god I hated them.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 12:47:58 am
I think a pedo bear would suit more
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:48:41 am
But they care Blag, they care
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:50:22 am
A Japanese soft fluffy toy?

Pedobear was corrupted.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 12:59:49 am
i <3 pedo bear
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:01:32 am
Ai but he's been done to death and you cannae effectively troll with it anymore.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:02:59 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
i <3 pedo bear
and he loves you XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 01:03:58 am
(http://lh3.ggpht.com/_mvobcuPa9QY/Rwo2R6LhXAI/AAAAAAAABoM/gGvr4eTZ3Qg/pl-pedo-bear.png)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:04:26 am
That's because Ryan is 3 years old.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 01:06:42 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Go Kill Yourself, Emo Kid
WTH? :(
I''m not the one slicing my wrists.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 01:09:39 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
That's because Ryan is 3 years old.

You can't argue with fact now can you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:10:06 am
No he can't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:12:18 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
That's because Ryan is 3 years old.

You can't argue with fact now can you
Facts are facts because they are facts.

Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Go Kill Yourself, Emo Kid
WTH? :(
I''m not the one slicing my wrists.

:( = emo

 :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:15:58 am
Blag speaks the truth
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:17:48 am
I also do, my son, I always do.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 01:18:20 am
son, something you want to tell us blag
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:18:50 am
You should know you gave birth to the aussie mucker.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 01:19:53 am
My memory fails me but i'll take your word for it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:21:16 am
Good I didn't want to show you the tapes.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:23:39 am
Vids please
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:25:40 am
You want to see the video of Ryan giving birth to you?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:37:16 am
Totally

vid now
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:38:13 am
I think ryan has them.  annoy him for them.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:44:25 am
/me wants them now Ryan
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:46:08 am
You might have to try to get back in first.  You did that allot.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:47:51 am
/me doesn't comprehend
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:48:38 am
TO get the tapes off Ryan you must try to get back inside Ryan.  When you were a baby you tried to do that allot.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 02:08:51 am
get inside Ryan

I lemon'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:09:46 am
Yeah, you wanted to be back where it was painless.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 02:12:25 am
Or painful for Ryan XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:13:02 am
That's only natural.  Infact just try to get back inside him now, see what he does.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 02:14:48 am
/me will wait until he sleeps =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:16:03 am
He sleeps when you're at school.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 02:17:03 am
/me has school holidays atm though
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 02:17:46 am
/me don't care
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:18:44 am
I've got work in 12 hours.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 02:19:16 am
lolz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:22:39 am
Atleast I can fund my dirty dirty habits.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 02:25:14 am
ELABORATE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 02:28:19 am
MMMMMMMMMMMMM dirty habits
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:32:13 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
ELABORATE
Whores and Drugs; I think I've said it before.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 10, 2010, 02:33:50 am
I do believe that I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:35:57 am
You've yet to learn my dear boy who's older than me by a year.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 02:44:11 am
=O Blag's 20
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:44:49 am
What did you think I was?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 02:52:37 am
78
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:55:00 am
I suppose that makes some sense.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 03:16:44 am
it makes lots of sense
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 03:19:14 am
How does it make sense?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 03:22:05 am
Read it again my young padawan
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 03:25:31 am
Why do you think I'm 78?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 03:38:55 am
WWII
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 03:45:04 am
And...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 03:46:56 am
Nuff said
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: coram_boy on April 10, 2010, 03:57:11 am
I have mods in this forum 8)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 03:58:28 am
Coram_boy is a god =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: coram_boy on April 10, 2010, 03:59:11 am
why yes, yes I am Peejik :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 04:00:21 am
Why?  Why am I posting here?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 04:01:37 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
Coram_boy is a god =O
X(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 04:08:53 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Why?  Why am I posting here?
That's not what I said!

What is Coram going to do to us?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 04:10:16 am
He's going to make us his puppets =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 04:11:20 am
Oh god, I can see our threads being turned from what they are into something more sinister.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 04:12:37 am
Is that possible?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 04:20:12 am
With a drunk and hungover Coram at the wheel... probably.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 04:21:14 am
I see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 04:23:04 am
He's already edited one of my posts, who knows what else he'll do!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 04:49:41 am
We shall see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 04:55:32 am
I hope not.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 05:16:23 am
As I said, we shall see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 05:21:27 am
I know that but I hope he gets bugger all the silly rabbit.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 06:12:37 am
TL;DR

What the flower is the subject?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 06:41:33 am
last post wins.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 06:44:58 am
Oh right :roll:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 10, 2010, 06:58:33 am
so do i win yet?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 07:13:50 am
How was your girlfriend?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 08:37:30 am
What he said^
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 09:05:26 am
he's disappeared!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 10:04:56 am
Ohes noes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 10:11:27 am
So, Peejik, no IRC?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 10:13:54 am
No, cause I'm about to have dinner in a few minutes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 10:15:24 am
Oh right, I'm nearly at 100 post per day.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 10:17:08 am
Go boy go
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 10:17:41 am
tbh I just want to stop posting but I just cannae do it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 10:20:17 am
I know
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 10:20:50 am
I wonder how much the percentage goes up everytime I post.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 10:21:13 am
Apparently 0.03%.  Aren't I lucky?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 10:21:47 am
maybe....
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 10:22:43 am
I mean, I only need another 200 or so posts and I'll have done it.

That seems like a giant waste of time.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jazzaa on April 10, 2010, 10:24:06 am
I win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 10:24:35 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I mean, I only need another 200 or so posts and I'll have done it.

That seems like a giant waste of time.

It is
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 10:27:43 am
At this rate though...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:27:43 am
I think you're incorrect about that percentage.
It cannot increase with 0.03% EACH post, since the number of total posts will increase with each post, thus making the next post a percentage of ~0.02999%.
The percentage will get smaller and smaller as the forum gets more and more posts...
It can, however, be an increase of ~0.03% each post - right now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 11:28:38 am
Or we can deal with solidish numbers and be surprised when it all works out.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:30:59 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Or we can deal with solidish numbers and be surprised when it all works out.
Or we could be mathematically correct and just add that little symbol shown below in my spoiler:
Because:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 11:32:32 am
I like my method more because it worked without having to think too much about it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:35:10 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I like my method more because it worked without having to think too much about it.
You would have been deducted points from your maths test though. But, hey...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 11:38:40 am
I got a A in GCSE maths because back then that shit mattered, right now, it doesn't matter.
Different techniques for different scenarios.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:54:48 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I got a A in GCSE maths because back then that shit mattered, right now, it doesn't matter.
Different techniques for different scenarios.
Congrats, dude.
Glad to see that you think maths really matter in your real life now as well ... eh, wait a minute?
That's not what you said, is it?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 10, 2010, 11:55:47 am
but this isnt real life, its posting on a forum where using non-exact numbers is more than reasonable
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:56:58 am
Quote from: "RiptaR"
but this isnt real life, its posting on a forum where using non-exact numbers is more than reasonable
There's no excuse ever for being mathematically incorrect.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:02:15 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "RiptaR"
but this isnt real life, its posting on a forum where using non-exact numbers is more than reasonable
There's no excuse ever for being mathematically incorrect.

There's always an excuse.  When you use Pi, do you get a turing super computer to calculate it to the umpteenth point?  No, you round up.  Inaccuracy.

Same thing, different requirments of accuracy are required for different tasks.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 12:12:05 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
There's always an excuse.  When you use Pi, do you get a turing super computer to calculate it to the umpteenth point?  No, you round up.  Inaccuracy.
Most of the time you use a calculator with a Pi-button (which gives you about 6-8 decimals) or you use 3.14 or 3.1415, or even 3.14159 (which thus would make 3.1415 into 3.1416).

This is accepted in the mathematical world of correctness. As long as you state what value you use for Pi.
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Same thing, different requirements of accuracy are required for different tasks.
True. But you stated a general rule that only worked for like 2 minutes. ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:23:13 pm
no.  It didn't.  Reason being I said 0.03% instead of 0.03
Because it's been 33 days since I registered, I needed to have 3,300 posts.  The 0.3 would have remained a constant, because it'll be 1/33 (33 days, 1 more post) means that adds on average 0.03030303030303030303030303030303 posts per day is added to my posts per day when I post.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:29:45 pm
=O Maths
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:32:21 pm
I know right, he tried to be all smart with me but I showed him.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:34:05 pm
who's this he?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 12:35:29 pm
A person
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:37:05 pm
Check page 66.  viewtopic.php?f=182&t=29353&start=1300#p628072 (http://forums.erepublik.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=182&t=29353&start=1300#p628072)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:38:00 pm
=O

O, that noob
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:39:58 pm
Ye, the guy who wants maths to be perfect except for when he has to make exceptions.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:41:21 pm
who cares, all I know is he's a noob =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 12:42:58 pm
So're you :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:44:20 pm
shuddup, you're noobier
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 12:48:40 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
no.  It didn't.  Reason being I said 0.03% instead of 0.03
Because it's been 33 days since I registered, I needed to have 3,300 posts.  The 0.3 would have remained a constant, because it'll be 1/33 (33 days, 1 more post) means that adds on average 0.03030303030303030303030303030303 posts per day is added to my posts per day when I post.
Wait... WHAT?

1) I understand I misunderstood you. Sorry.

2) There are some things we need to look at:

33 days since registered, 3,300 posts, making it 100 posts/per day.
1/33 = 1 post per 33 days, making a percentage of ~0.03% post per day.

An average would be X/Y, where X is the total number of your posts and Y is the total number of days registered.
Right now it would be: 3509/34=~103.2 posts per day.

Saying you want to reach 3,600 posts, you would need to stay on the forum for:
(Posts per days)/(24 hours)=posts/hour and then we (3600-3509)/(posts/hour)=how many hours it would take.
=> 103.2/24=4.3 posts/hour, 91/4.3=~21.16 hours, roughly 21 hours and 10 minutes.

THUS: If you visit the forum regulary, as you have done in your average up until now, you will have reached 3,600 posts in about 21 hours from now (me guesstimating it has taken me about 5-10 minutes to write all this).
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 12:49:21 pm
tl;dr
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 12:53:48 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
tl;dr
:(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 10, 2010, 12:55:29 pm
id give him about an hour to reach it :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 12:57:24 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Peejik"
tl;dr
:(

I think what you have to realise is that peejik is an aussie
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 12:58:28 pm
Quote from: "RiptaR"
id give him about an hour to reach it :P
Yeah, me too.
But, mathematically and statistically (both seen over the 34 days registered), he'll reach it in ... a guesstimate of 20 hours and 45 minutes.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 01:00:13 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Peejik"
tl;dr
:(

I think what you have to realise is that peejik is an aussie
That explains it all! Thank you.
Oh! You said "aussie", I thought you said something else  :oops:

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 01:04:01 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
no.  It didn't.  Reason being I said 0.03% instead of 0.03
Because it's been 33 days since I registered, I needed to have 3,300 posts.  The 0.3 would have remained a constant, because it'll be 1/33 (33 days, 1 more post) means that adds on average 0.03030303030303030303030303030303 posts per day is added to my posts per day when I post.
Wait... WHAT?

1) I understand I misunderstood you. Sorry.

2) There are some things we need to look at:

33 days since registered, 3,300 posts, making it 100 posts/per day.
1/33 = 1 post per 33 days, [s:36solijj]making a percentage[/s:36solijj] adding  0.03 post per day.

[s:36solijj]An average would be X/Y, where X is the total number of your posts and Y is the total number of days registered.
Right now it would be: 3509/34=~103.2 posts per day.

Saying you want to reach 3,600 posts, you would need to stay on the forum for:
(Posts per days)/(24 hours)=posts/hour and then we (3600-3509)/(posts/hour)=how many hours it would take.
=> 103.2/24=4.3 posts/hour, 91/4.3=~21.16 hours, roughly 21 hours and 10 minutes.

THUS: If you visit the forum regulary, as you have done in your average up until now, you will have reached 3,600 posts in about 21 hours from now (me guesstimating it has taken me about 5-10 minutes to write all this).[/s:36solijj]

It deals with 1 days, not 24 1 hours.  

33 days, 3300 posts for 100 ppd.
1/33=0.03030303030303030303030303030303

That's what each post is worth.  

3300*0.03030303030303030303030303030303 = 99.999999999999999999999999999999, near enough 100.

Tomorrow it'll be a bit less.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 01:05:40 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Peejik"
tl;dr
:(

I think what you have to realise is that peejik is an aussie
Therefore he's smarter than Ryan XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 02:08:57 pm
So take, these broken wings
I need your hands to come and heal me once again
So I can fly, until the end of time
Until the end of time
Until the end of time
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 02:13:53 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
no.  It didn't.  Reason being I said 0.03% instead of 0.03
Because it's been 33 days since I registered, I needed to have 3,300 posts.  The 0.3 would have remained a constant, because it'll be 1/33 (33 days, 1 more post) means that adds on average 0.03030303030303030303030303030303 posts per day is added to my posts per day when I post.
Wait... WHAT?

1) I understand I misunderstood you. Sorry.

2) There are some things we need to look at:

33 days since registered, 3,300 posts, making it 100 posts/per day.
1/33 = 1 post per 33 days, [s:mrvobu81]making a percentage[/s:mrvobu81] adding  0.03 post per day.

[s:mrvobu81]An average would be X/Y, where X is the total number of your posts and Y is the total number of days registered.
Right now it would be: 3509/34=~103.2 posts per day.

Saying you want to reach 3,600 posts, you would need to stay on the forum for:
(Posts per days)/(24 hours)=posts/hour and then we (3600-3509)/(posts/hour)=how many hours it would take.
=> 103.2/24=4.3 posts/hour, 91/4.3=~21.16 hours, roughly 21 hours and 10 minutes.

THUS: If you visit the forum regulary, as you have done in your average up until now, you will have reached 3,600 posts in about 21 hours from now (me guesstimating it has taken me about 5-10 minutes to write all this).[/s:mrvobu81]

It deals with 1 days, not 24 1 hours.  

33 days, 3300 posts for 100 ppd.
1/33=0.03030303030303030303030303030303

That's what each post is worth.  

3300*0.03030303030303030303030303030303 = 99.999999999999999999999999999999, near enough 100.

Tomorrow it'll be a bit less.
So...
1/33=~0.03, how much percent one day is out of 33. True.
3300*~0.03=~100, being the average number of your posts/day. True.
HOWEVER
Assuming these numbers are correct, the numbers of posts you have today should be 3,400.
Thus: 1/34=~0.029, 3400*0.029=~98.6
BUT
Your posts are >3,400, making me believe that 0.03 is a fixed number in your head, and you're trying to live up top it even today, resulting in posting more than 100 to make the numbers fit tomorrow.
RESULT
You will never reach 0.03 again, since it's how many percent 1 day is out of 33, and your days will increase, but not the 1 day.

OBSERVATIONS
You're probably just calculating what I am, but we're using different methods and yours are more advanced mathematically while mine are more logical.
What you get in the end (the 99.999999...) is the average of how many posts a day you have posted.
I simplified that equation just by taking 3300/33=100.

CONCLUSION
I was right about the decreasing percentage.
I was right about my (now crossed out) calculations above, and those made here - even though we didn't strive for the same goal.
And I was right when I said that your calculations were mathematically incorrect since it wasn't obvious for us to follow your thoughts.
And we're both right out of our minds taking this discussion so far as we did.
And you're right it's my fault it has come to this.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:16:24 pm
I know!
posts: 3531
          ____  = 34.000962927298988926336061627347
PPD : 103.85

We didn't check how long I've been on here, have we?  It's 34 days.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 02:20:38 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I know!
posts: 3531
          ____  = 34.000962927298988926336061627347
PPD : 103.85

We didn't check how long I've been on here, have we?  It's 34 days.
Check my calculations that you decided to cross out (like a mad man).
There I've stated that it's 34 days today.
Happy 34th day's anniversary.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 02:22:02 pm
NO MATH









Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 02:24:28 pm
NO MATH







Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:26:26 pm
That 34 will only change when I post though, not based on a time scale.

We can now reverse that to get the true PPD which still calculates to 103.85.

That divided by posts is: 0.02941093174738034551118663268196


New data:

    3538
    104.06

33.999615606380934076494330194119


0.02941209723007348784624081401922

Slight difference but now my birth has changed.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 02:34:09 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
That 34 will only change when I post though, not based on a time scale.

We can now reverse that to get the true PPD which still calculates to 103.85.

That divided by posts is: 0.02941093174738034551118663268196


New data:

    3538
    104.06

33.999615606380934076494330194119


0.02941209723007348784624081401922

Slight difference but now my birth has changed.
Now your basically stating what I've already stated.
But I do however endorse you in this calculation since I was able to follow it without any (major) flaws.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 02:35:17 pm
(http://uvtblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/bitch_please.jpg)




Do you know what no maths means?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:35:51 pm
wonder if I could collect samples of data every now and then and plot it...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 02:36:11 pm
Well done jake, you said maths.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 02:38:30 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
wonder if I could collect samples of data every now and then and plot it...
I would have to kill you if you make that decision
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:41:10 pm
I've already got 2 samples, I can collect more later.  I'll collect a sample everyday.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 02:41:44 pm
lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 02:42:36 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
wonder if I could collect samples of data every now and then and plot it...
I would have to kill you if you make that decision
And I would have to support him.
Think it would make a nice curve, especially if his Internet crashed for a week or so.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 02:44:23 pm
I don like this
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 02:46:59 pm
Just be happy I don't have data since day 1.  

Also, Loyosi, my PPD has decreased from 104.06 to 101.69.

This means data recorded at a specific time of each day.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 02:49:22 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Just be happy I don't have data since day 1.  

Also, Loyosi, my PPD has decreased from 104.06 to 101.69.

This means data recorded at a specific time of each day.
Please pick one specific time of the day yes, perhaps even two or three times per day if your up for it.
But don't make it ridiculously accurate.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 10, 2010, 02:50:20 pm
I'm not reading this thread for a while (not gonna bother with maths shit)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 02:52:10 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I'm not reading this thread for a while (not gonna bother with maths shit)
Too bad :(
Really enjoyed your 80's reference at the top of the page.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 10, 2010, 04:12:45 pm
Less maths more hammering numbers till they fit.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jazzaa on April 10, 2010, 07:56:49 pm
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 08:12:54 pm
Oh, yeah. I can just post anything I want in here.

HUZZA!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 10, 2010, 10:44:12 pm
It's been a while since I won this game
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 10:45:21 pm
I have never won such a game
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 11:19:52 pm
You have never won period
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 11:22:05 pm
Your correct, i have never one a period. Why does one come by this must in demand prize.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 11:29:57 pm
/me confused X(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:47:03 pm
Ryan casts Confusion.
Peejik is Confused.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 11:48:26 pm
I attempt to confuse often replacing words for no apparent reason or later to give a cookie to the person who spots my mistake, who wants a cookie.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:49:47 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I attempt to confuse often replacing words for no apparent reason or later to give a cookie to the person who spots my mistake, who wants a cookie.
You wrote "one" instead of "won".
Gief cookie!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 11:51:39 pm
you wrote Gief instead of Give, no cookie.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 11:53:28 pm
Cookie XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 10, 2010, 11:54:28 pm
caek?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 10, 2010, 11:56:00 pm
You get a waffle, of the blue variety.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 10, 2010, 11:57:13 pm
COOKIE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 10, 2010, 11:58:48 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
you wrote Gief instead of Give, no cookie.
God damn you, sir!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 12:01:42 am
lemonade
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 12:02:42 am
I do not take kindly to your harsh words.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 11, 2010, 12:04:14 am
I take kindly to them however.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 12:05:47 am
Ohhh there anarchy in this most serene of surrounding
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 12:08:11 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I do not take kindly to your harsh words.
Sorry :(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 12:15:13 am
You post you lose.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 11, 2010, 12:17:19 am
OH SHI-

Blaggard is here. The end is nigh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 12:22:46 am
I concur, were all doomed
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 12:45:58 am
You fell into my trap, from now on forth, normal rules continue.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 11, 2010, 12:49:39 am
NOOO, normal rules?!

you tyrant
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 12:51:20 am
Last post ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 12:54:06 am
YOU LIE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 12:56:02 am
Anarchist and Ryan are Disqualified from this thread from now on.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 12:58:43 am
but......
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 01:00:39 am
Disqualified,
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 01:03:07 am
You're like all the other pedo's i've ever met, offer so much upfront but can never deliver.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 01:10:50 am
My pedo tactic:

Buy a puppy
Break puppys leg
Go to School
"Hey, I've ran over this puppy and I don't know where a Vets is, can one of you show me one?"
directions
"err I'm not so good with directions, can one of you hop in and show me the way?"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 01:11:48 am
That one's been used on me to many times
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 01:27:59 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
My pedo tactic:

Buy a puppy
Break puppys leg
Go to School
"Hey, I've ran over this puppy and I don't know where a Vets is, can one of you show me one?"
directions
"err I'm not so good with directions, can one of you hop in and show me the way?"
That's horrible ... and awkward (fifth or sixth time today).
Good night.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 01:55:06 am
=O Who ever knew Blag
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 02:05:41 am
haha Blag you are messed up
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 02:08:14 am
You only just found out?

/me shakes my head X(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 02:10:18 am
i had my suspicions, but now its proven
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 02:18:00 am
I see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 02:20:00 am
but do you really see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 02:21:20 am
Yes I do
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 02:32:02 am
That scenario actually happened in my primary school.  The girl (8y/0) and puppie were found stranded inside Sherwood forest.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 02:36:04 am
Were you a pedo that young =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 03:00:22 am
I was driving vans since I was 4.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 03:10:54 am
he even has the number plate SNATCH3R
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 03:11:53 am
XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 03:15:04 am
The back of my van is like a catacombs.  If my van ever gets illegally searched they shoot a symbol into the shipper.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 03:19:03 am
shipper?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 07:03:27 am
Yeah, it's my word for the child.  Someone searches it without pressing precise buttons and dancing a particular way and it'll force a symbol (that big metal disk that drummers use) to be propelled through the shipper.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 09:47:34 am
Anyways...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 09:50:20 am
anyways what?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 09:51:04 am
Anyways whatever :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 09:53:05 am
whatever?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 09:57:25 am
Whatever anything :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 10:00:37 am
http://www.dangerouslaboratories.org/radscout.html (http://www.dangerouslaboratories.org/radscout.html)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:02:47 am
ORLY?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:12:54 am
yea rly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 10:22:25 am
Quick, build your own nuclear reactors!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:37:51 am
/snore
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 10:40:12 am
Never one to truely underestimate nuclear reactors, I've built my own beta radiation gun.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:42:35 am
radiation gun?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 10:45:26 am
Shoot radiation at someone, give them cancer.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:47:09 am
=O

That sounds mean =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 10:48:37 am
Shoot enough radiation and make them evaporate.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:52:45 am
I thought it was to give them cancer  :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:00:54 am
Or make them into gas.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 11:01:49 am
Blaggard, that's an awful weapon, dispose of it now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:10:51 am
I'll use my refined Beta Radiation gun to destroy the prototype.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 11:26:25 am
i want a radiation gun!!!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:28:49 am
But yours now for £499,999.99
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 11:29:46 am
nar i think i wait a bit for the price to drop
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:36:00 am
Ok, £20 grand.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 11:38:58 am
i was thinking more around $20

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:46:33 am
Shift + 3.

£

RiptaR, the materials used to construct the weapon cost £50,000; the ammunition requires specialised equipment and training and costs allot too.

It's not as if you could get some old paint, break up some smoke detectors and swipe some other metals.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 11, 2010, 11:54:10 am
hmm do you offer any kind of finance options
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 12:53:05 pm
Quote from: "RiptaR"
i want a radiation gun!!!
me too
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 02:28:20 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "RiptaR"
i want a radiation gun!!!
me too
Not me.

Why haven't we gotten any orders today? And why aren't we in any war? I want my XP.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 05:20:33 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "RiptaR"
i want a radiation gun!!!
me too
Not me.

Why haven't we gotten any orders today? And why aren't we in any war? I want my XP.
Chill your nips :P






Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 05:23:48 pm
No nuclear threats here, only radiation
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 05:25:04 pm
Radiation is kind of nuclear ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 05:33:14 pm
Not really.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 05:39:38 pm
They use it to cure cancer bitch
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 05:41:22 pm
Mutating your cancer.  Your cancer has cancer!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 05:59:02 pm
Biology/Medicine isn't my my thing.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 06:04:35 pm
I'm not an expert in quantum mechanics.  Doesn't stop me arguing others about it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 06:30:05 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I'm not an expert in quantum mechanics.  Doesn't stop me arguing with others about it.
Fixed it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 09:17:31 pm
You don't get a cookie of blag though.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 09:18:28 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
You don't get a cookie from blag though.
Fixed it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 09:20:02 pm
*gives Loyosi a cookie* Well done
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 09:41:56 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*gives Loyosi a cookie* Well done
THANK YOU!
*Nom nom nom*
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:20:24 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*gives Loyosi a cookie* Well done
Why not me? :evil:


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 10:21:21 pm
Yes, run along peasant  :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:22:49 pm
I refuse

(http://hakashamut.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/black-power-pin.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 10:26:19 pm
You are not worth my time :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:28:11 pm
Implying that I am worth your time ... even though you haven't answered my PM. ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 10:31:51 pm
PM's are to hard to see
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:36:51 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
You are not worth my time :D. You are worth more, because my time is a waste of existence
Fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:38:05 pm
Jake, that's a bit unkind, don't you think?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 10:38:45 pm
Alex is that type of person :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:41:16 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Alex is that type of person :D
Alex Drex? Yeah, he's a bitch
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 10:43:28 pm
No your alter-ego silly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:44:16 pm
O yeah, my fake name
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:44:58 pm
I sooo adore fake names ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 10:45:25 pm
I think they're gay :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:46:59 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I think they're gay :P
Not when pulling a prank on the eUK community that almost everyone fell for :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:47:57 pm
O look, it's Alex
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:48:12 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I think they're gay :P
Me too.
If we assume that your "gay" means "having or showing a merry, lively mood" or "bright or showy".
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 10:49:03 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I think they're gay :P
Not when pulling a prank on the eUK community that almost everyone fell for :D

If you say so, how's your GF jake.


Quote from: "Peejik"
O look, it's Alex

Here comes my backup  :D

Quote from: "Loyosi"
Me too.
If we assume that your "gay" means "having or showing a merry, lively mood" or "bright or showy".

ofc i do  ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 10:50:28 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I'm not an expert in quantum mechanics.  Doesn't stop me arguing with others about it.
Fixed it.
Arguing "with" others means that they are an active part of the argument.

You may be a teacher but you think nothing about context.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:52:12 pm
Hmmmm deep
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:53:10 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I'm not an expert in quantum mechanics.  Doesn't stop me arguing with others about it.
Fixed it.
Arguing "with" others means that they are an active part of the argument.

You may be a teacher but you think nothing about context.
Au contraire, my friend.
I considered "to", "at", etc. But came to the logical conclusion that they must at least acknowledge you some how.
After all, English isn't my first language.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:54:48 pm
=O

Bringing out the big guns (aka French)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:55:05 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I think they're gay :P
Not when pulling a prank on the eUK community that almost everyone fell for :D

If you say so, how's your GF jake.
I don't have one at the moment, but I for real broke up with one about a month ago. Since then, I haven't had one
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:55:32 pm
O really Alex
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 10:56:05 pm
Specially when drunk.

Everyone's a better mathematician and scientist when drunk.
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Fixed it.
Arguing "with" others means that they are an active part of the argument.

You may be a teacher but you think nothing about context.
Au contraire, my friend.
I considered "to", "at", etc. But came to the logical conclusion that they must at least acknowledge you some how.
After all, English isn't my first language.

The more they try to ignore you the better.  Makes 'em feel right uncomfortable.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 10:56:43 pm
(http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/68/original/Yarly.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:57:54 pm
Really aLex, really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:58:05 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
=O

Bringing out the big guns (aka French)
ofc
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 10:58:56 pm
I think Blag should use some latin
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 10:59:53 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
I think Blag should use some latin
Et tu, Peejik?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 11:00:22 pm
He's an aussie, end of that.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:00:54 pm
XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:02:03 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Really aLex, really?
(http://careforadrink.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bitch_please.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:03:14 pm
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

On the other hand, we denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who are so beguiled and demoralized by the charms of pleasure of the moment, so blinded by desire, that they cannot foresee the pain and trouble that are bound to ensue; and equal blame belongs to those who fail in their duty through weakness of will, which is the same as saying through shrinking from toil and pain. These cases are perfectly simple and easy to distinguish. In a free hour, when our power of choice is untrammelled and when nothing prevents our being able to do what we like best, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided. But in certain circumstances and owing to the claims of duty or the obligations of business it will frequently occur that pleasures have to be repudiated and annoyances accepted. The wise man therefore always holds in these matters to this principle of selection: he rejects pleasures to secure other greater pleasures, or else he endures pains to avoid worse pains.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:04:29 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Peejik"
Really aLex, really?
(http://careforadrink.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bitch_please.jpg)
Creative stuff alex
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:06:02 pm
I can be real creative. But it's the weekend and I don't want to use my brain power
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:06:44 pm
That's cause you don't have any brain power, you're just trying to make excuses XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 11:07:08 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Peejik"
Really aLex, really?
(http://careforadrink.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bitch_please.jpg)
Creative stuff alex
I love those pics, makes me LOL.

Quote from: "Blaggard"
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

On the other hand, we denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who are so beguiled and demoralized by the charms of pleasure of the moment, so blinded by desire, that they cannot foresee the pain and trouble that are bound to ensue; and equal blame belongs to those who fail in their duty through weakness of will, which is the same as saying through shrinking from toil and pain. These cases are perfectly simple and easy to distinguish. In a free hour, when our power of choice is untrammelled and when nothing prevents our being able to do what we like best, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided. But in certain circumstances and owing to the claims of duty or the obligations of business it will frequently occur that pleasures have to be repudiated and annoyances accepted. The wise man therefore always holds in these matters to this principle of selection: he rejects pleasures to secure other greater pleasures, or else he endures pains to avoid worse pains.
Google translate? PLEASE...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:07:50 pm
alex makes you lol...........

Shame on you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 11:08:45 pm
I laugh AT him
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:10:32 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I laugh with him laughing at my everyday fails
Fix'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:10:56 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

On the other hand, we denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who are so beguiled and demoralized by the charms of pleasure of the moment, so blinded by desire, that they cannot foresee the pain and trouble that are bound to ensue; and equal blame belongs to those who fail in their duty through weakness of will, which is the same as saying through shrinking from toil and pain. These cases are perfectly simple and easy to distinguish. In a free hour, when our power of choice is untrammelled and when nothing prevents our being able to do what we like best, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided. But in certain circumstances and owing to the claims of duty or the obligations of business it will frequently occur that pleasures have to be repudiated and annoyances accepted. The wise man therefore always holds in these matters to this principle of selection: he rejects pleasures to secure other greater pleasures, or else he endures pains to avoid worse pains.
TL ; DR
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:11:21 pm
TRIPLE POSTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:14:01 pm
SPAM
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:14:17 pm
LIKE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 11:14:33 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
TRIPLE POSTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fail. Post funny pic instead.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:14:41 pm
ALEX   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 11:15:09 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
ALEX   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:
TRIPPLE POST DENIED!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:16:05 pm
What you are doing to that joke Peejik is necrophilia. You just killed the joke, and now you're raping it (constantly)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:16:57 pm
not really

IT ISN'T A JOKE, THAT REALLY ISN'T THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND IS IT?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:17:55 pm
I picked a fake name, and now u insist it's my real name
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 11:18:51 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I picked a fake name, and now u insist it's my real name
I get that all the time. Because I like it that way.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:20:43 pm
It's not a fake name

stop lying
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 11:27:00 pm
Alex was you're name before the operation, now you go by the name of Jake.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:29:01 pm
XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:30:32 pm
Ryan provides us with more useful information.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:31:04 pm
He just did, didn't he
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:34:29 pm
Like a polished turd, some people believe they are valuable (farmers, as manure, people that do stuff) whilst others do not (Alex, yuppie).
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:37:14 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Alex was you're name before the operation, now you go by the name of Jake.
(http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/128320993454987500dudewaitw.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:37:43 pm
GREAT PICTURE JAKE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:40:57 pm
I know right he has huge amount of cat pictures I think he's got 37 cats and a marshmallow.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 11, 2010, 11:42:45 pm
Don't forget the two devil posters.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:44:35 pm
and a marshmallow?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:48:22 pm
Quote from: "Peejik"
GREAT PICTURE JAKE
l2sarcasmoninternet
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 11, 2010, 11:49:09 pm
l2grammar
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 11, 2010, 11:56:20 pm
l r n  2  s p a c e b a r .
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 11, 2010, 11:56:56 pm
Made me lol Blaggard
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 11, 2010, 11:59:13 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Alex was your name before the operation, now you go by the name of Jake.
Fixed it. Cookie?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:00:36 am
The spacebar is the most underrated button, yet the most used.  At least I think it's the most used.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:01:15 am
*passes Loyosi a cookie* Well done YOU'RE getting good.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:02:23 am
Do you know what's the most unused button?

The second shift key
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:03:36 am
Oh Shi- You're right.  I use it some times for some shortcuts.

There's also the Alt Gr button.  Wtf does that do.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:06:47 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Oh Shi- You're right.  I use it some times for some shortcuts.

There's also the Alt Gr button.  Wtf does that do.
Hold down alt now click on letters and numbers. You'll §∑∑
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 12:07:53 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*passes Loyosi a cookie* Well done YOU'RE getting good.
Thank you ... nom nom nom ... I lam tlaying ma besht ... nom nom nom.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:09:08 am
The left hand alt does the menu bars at top.

Right hand alt is doing nothing.

Loyosi:  No need for a translation.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:11:15 am
he needs to put one there for alex
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:17:54 am
And me obviously.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:18:45 am
What about me?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:20:51 am
You're alex remember.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:21:47 am
I refuse to be
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:25:43 am
But you will have to
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:32:31 am
Fulfil you're destiny!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:34:42 am
NEVAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TKsuNLSa-I)




Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:35:43 am
Rap is shit, just thought i'd mention it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:35:55 am
I didn't click it

Cause it's probs some shoddy rap or something XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:36:47 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Rap is shit, just thought i'd mention it.
It's R&B dumbass - Ne Yo isn't rap

l2genres
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:37:59 am
l2readminds

I never clicked on the link dumb ass
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:38:19 am
XD
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:39:03 am
Now this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWDwLnQAjs) is shitty rap
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:40:02 am
Listening but I don't understand why you've linked it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:40:25 am
I'm not clicking
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:40:40 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Listening but I don't understand why you've linked it.
It's an amazing song. That's why


Peejik, u should. Learn the difference
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:41:13 am
Yet you describe it a shitty
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:42:07 am
I will not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:42:28 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Yet you describe it a shitty
I did.....



















































































































to make fun of you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:43:18 am
l2bfunny
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:43:31 am
good to know
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:44:08 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
l2bfunny
l2beagoodtrollbitch
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:44:50 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Listening but I don't understand why you've linked it.
It's an amazing song. That's why


Peejik, u should. Learn the difference
What the flower did you link me too.

I feel like I need to pour Tabasco source in my ears to be manly again.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:46:55 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
l2bfunny
l2beagoodtrollbitch

There's a difference between trolling and stating facts
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:47:38 am
What he said
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:48:12 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Listening but I don't understand why you've linked it.
It's an amazing song. That's why


Peejik, u should. Learn the difference
What the flower did you link me too.

I feel like I need to pour Tabasco source in my ears to be manly again.
You have no idea how much that made me lol




That's what happens when u mess with the Pearlshire
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:48:48 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
l2bfunny
l2beagoodtrollbitch

There's a difference between trolling and stating facts
Geez, why do people all of a sudden hate me more than Goku and Shadow?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 12:49:16 am
Btw, alex, we only just found out, but apparently you are in love with Justin Bieber

(http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/7000000/justin-bieber-justin-bieber-7011878-384-576.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:49:42 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
That's what happens when u mess with the Pearlshire

Now that made me lol
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:50:57 am
I'd rather die by being tied on top of bamboo shoots growing through me than hear that kid again
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 12:51:54 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
Btw, alex, we only just found out, but apparently you are in love with Justin Bieber

(http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/7000000/justin-bieber-justin-bieber-7011878-384-576.jpg)
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: trufax
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 12:52:15 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I'd rather die by being tied on top of bamboo shoots growing through me than hear that kid again
If you weren't serious that'd be funny.

Cause you are serious, you're in denial.

You imagine him bending over, singing whilst you plug him.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 12:54:09 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I'd rather die by being tied on top of bamboo shoots growing through me than hear that kid again
If you weren't serious that'd be funny.

Cause you are serious, you're in denial.

You imagine him bending over, singing whilst you plug him.
I didn't get the last part of that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 12:57:47 am
Just for the record: No one clicked your link "Pearly".
I just read the spoiler and saw your failed "mind reading"-tricks.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 01:00:00 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Just for the record: No one clicked your link "Pearly".
I just read the spoiler and saw your failed "mind reading"-tricks.
Already hating me, I see...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 01:00:07 am
(http://www.gifsoup.com/view/221210/justin-bieber-o.gif)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 01:00:26 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Just for the record: No one clicked your link "Pearly".
I just read the spoiler and saw your failed "mind reading"-tricks.
Already hating me, I see...
No, just noticing the tiny details...

Quote from: "Peejik"
(http://www.gifsoup.com/view/221210/justin-bieber-o.gif)
/me watches the fag dance
/me pukes
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 01:00:54 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
(http://www.gifsoup.com/view/221210/justin-bieber-o.gif)
Die. Now. For. Posting. Shit.


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:01:46 am
Plugging = plug up a hole with something.

He's singing whilst your plugging and he's bent over.

Imagination.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 01:02:49 am
Nobody has LOL'd at my post yet... So I guess you guys aren't reading my spoilers :(

Read this, please. Funny stuff ahead:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 01:04:09 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Plugging = plug up a hole with something.

He's singing whilst your plugging and he's bent over.

Imagination.
He's one of few girls I'd never screw
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 01:05:51 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
No problem Jake
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 01:06:26 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Plugging = plug up a hole with something.

He's singing whilst your plugging and he's bent over.

Imagination.
He's one of few girls I'd never screw
If you consider him being a girl ... I ... I ... I dunno what to say, really.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:07:09 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Plugging = plug up a hole with something.

He's singing whilst your plugging and he's bent over.

Imagination.
He's one of few girls I'd never screw

or would never get the chance to
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:07:53 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Nobody has LOL'd at my post yet... So I guess you guys aren't reading my spoilers :(

Read this, please. Funny stuff ahead:
Yeah I clicked it but didn't have anything to contribute cause I thought it was shite.

Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Plugging = plug up a hole with something.

He's singing whilst your plugging and he's bent over.

Imagination.
He's one of few girls I'd never screw
If you see him as a girl ... I ... I ... I dunno what to say, really.

It shows that he thinks he's the man in the bedroom.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 01:08:32 am
Which he obviously isn't
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:10:52 am
How would you know?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:11:02 am
I've intercepted alex's mail


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 01:12:03 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Nobody has LOL'd at my post yet... So I guess you guys aren't reading my spoilers :(

Read this, please. Funny stuff ahead:
Yeah I clicked it but didn't have anything to contribute cause I thought it was shite.
WTH? It was funny to DIE FOR. Or perhaps you didn't understand it?
You see, the T-key is just a TINY, TINY, TINY bit to the right of the R-key.
If one would slip, it could have disastrous consequences (although very funny ones as well).
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:13:20 am
Yeah I know.  A funny concept but in action it isn't good.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 01:13:50 am
This has become


"Let's troll Jake."

No point in posting here...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 01:14:59 am
New topic: Bears.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:15:11 am
It's cause you're easily trollable.  

Besides, I'm the one getting trolled hard.  All y'all have it in for me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 01:16:27 am
Bears.
Not pedobears.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:17:45 am
I had a fight with a bear once.

It killed me and left me rotting on the riverbed.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:17:56 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
This has become


"Let's troll Jake."

No point in posting here...

No it isn't it's, it's lets wait to see what jake posts, still thinks he right on everything so show him up and annoy him, nothing more than you taking things far too seriously and come out looking like a prick with no sense of humour. Remember you go yourself into this situation.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 01:19:40 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
I had a fight with a bear once.

It killed me and left me rotting on the riverbed.
Orly?
You sure it wasn't zombies on the 360? And you lost, using auto aim?
And they ATE your dead corpse?
Guess it's coming back to you now, ain't it?

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:24:00 am
A BEAR KILLS RYAN AND EATS HIS SPERM.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:25:31 am
I never liked them anyway, bringing my wanking to an end and making me all sticky.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:26:15 am
You don't catch it in toilet roll or something?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:29:01 am
What you expect to cover all of my penis and body in toilet roll, i can't control the excitement of my sperm as they come shooting out.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 12, 2010, 01:29:33 am
i decided my room needed painting, its a slow but very enjoyable process
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:30:07 am
ewwwwwwwwwwwww
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:32:00 am
What colour does it dry?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:33:51 am
lol, i feel an experiment coming on
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 12, 2010, 01:36:21 am
hmm tbh it drys kinda clearish, you got to do a lot of layers to bring out the real colour,

but thats a surprise i will leave for you to find out on your own
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:36:50 am
yellow

I bet it's yellow.


If it's red I'm worried.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:38:05 am
If it's red i would go to the doctor immediately
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:39:30 am
What if it makes the face of Jesus?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:40:32 am
I'll be even more impressed if it makes the face of me, otherwise i have jesus's sperm.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:42:47 am
It makes the face of GOD.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:43:41 am
Ok it makes the face of an imaginary person
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:44:13 am
if it's the face of god it isn't imaginary.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:45:19 am
How do you know what a person who has never been seen before, therefore imaginary, looks like,
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:47:54 am
because the sperm will write at the bottom "portrait of god by RiptaR"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:49:19 am
What if there swimming in the wrong direction or he has a low sperm count
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:49:52 am
God will make them better for this portrait.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 01:51:48 am
But he doesn't exist
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:52:26 am
If the portrait happens as I've described I believe it will be adequate proof to rattle a few cages.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 12, 2010, 01:53:59 am
nar it will just mean that my sperm is artistic
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:55:06 am
that or god.

Well, it could be anything.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 12, 2010, 01:56:00 am
nar im pretty sure it could never mean god
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:58:24 am
Anything includes anything.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 12, 2010, 01:58:55 am
depends on ones view of anything
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 02:02:42 am
any(a): one or some or every or all without specification;

an entity that is not named specifically;

So a entity without specification.

I think that includes god or lizard men and Zionists.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 12, 2010, 02:08:01 am
not if when saying anything its it under the assumption that only real things are included

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 02:11:58 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zion)

A zionist believes that jews should control everything from Zion.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: RiptaR on April 12, 2010, 02:16:02 am
fools havnt they seen the matrix
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 02:17:59 am
They made the matrix.

They make and own everything.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 12, 2010, 03:33:57 am
But I win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 03:34:18 am
Are you a Zionist?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 03:40:40 am
Good question. I'm not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 03:42:34 am
I just noticed I went past 4k posts.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 03:44:39 am
I did that too. I forgot to celebrate



O SHI-

YOU'RE CATCHING UP!!!!!!! :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 12, 2010, 03:45:44 am
I win, Again.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 03:46:38 am
(http://static.funnyjunk.com/pictures/nein0.gif)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 03:47:26 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I did that too. I forgot to celebrate



O SHI-

YOU'RE CATCHING UP!!!!!!! :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o

I'm on 111.64 posts per day, only a matter of time.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 03:49:18 am
This is what I have to say (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InsspuvAmBs)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 03:50:51 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
This is what I have to say (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InsspuvAmBs)

He blew his head open with a pistol.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 12, 2010, 04:14:56 am
Oh, it would havee been so mch more intresting with a rock LAUNCHER.

T
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:17:00 am
rock launchers aka Arms.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 04:17:52 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
rock launchers aka Arms.
u forgot penises
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 12, 2010, 04:18:17 am
*rocket launcher.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:22:17 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
rock launchers aka Arms.
u forgot penises
How can a penis launch rocks or rockets?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 04:25:14 am
launch my penis. It's more destructive than any rocket. You know what they say - the Blacker they are, the Bigger they are
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:28:59 am
That's a bad saying.

Have you got a STI?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 04:30:12 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
That's a bad saying.

Have you got a STI?
What's STI?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:31:37 am
How old are you jake?

A STI is Sexually Transmitted Disease.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: John Thunscorpe on April 12, 2010, 04:48:38 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
How old are you jake?

A STI is Sexually Transmitted Disease.
sup fool
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:54:45 am
Quote from: "John Thunscorpe"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
How old are you jake?

A STI is Sexually Transmitted Disease.
sup fool
Doctor Doctor, I'm Infectous!
When we touch, when we kiss,
Doctor Doctor, It's fatal!
Help us, help us.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 12, 2010, 05:20:18 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
How old are you jake?

A STI is Sexually Transmitted Disease.
alex is 12, I thought we already established that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 05:27:51 am
Yeah but kids aged 9 get taught about STI's now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 12, 2010, 07:26:11 am
Did you know that ears are chodes.


Wider than they are long.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 07:29:35 am
You've got a different meaning to the norm revolving around the word Chode.  It comes from the word Choad which mean:
A penis; A loser or undesirable person; an insulting name
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/choad
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 12, 2010, 07:32:13 am
a chode is something that is wider than it is  long.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 07:50:36 am
That's your definition, the internet says different.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 08:08:56 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I did that too. I forgot to celebrate

O SHI-

YOU'RE CATCHING UP!!!!!!! :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o

I'm on 111.64 posts per day, only a matter of time.
Missed my 100th post (by 4 posts) and my 200th post (by 7 posts).
And I'm so scared that Blaggard is catching up with you Jake.
Blaggard is like the ... god of spam, or something.

Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
What you expect to cover all of my penis and body in toilet roll, i can't control the excitement of my sperm as they come shooting out.
Practice makes perfect. Do it. Here, let me help you: viewtopic.php?f=182&t=36372 (http://forums.erepublik.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=182&t=36372)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 08:12:44 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Blaggard is like the ... god of spam, or something.
Prayers will be unanswered.
Plees will be unheard.
Forgiveness never granted.
Sacrifices being wasted.

Call me a god and expect disappointment in return.
Accept me as your Superior and the bounties of conquest will be ours.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 10:43:25 am
I need to hook a brother up, pay him, and have him post shit in BBH while I go to school
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob Boblo on April 12, 2010, 10:43:50 am
I was wondering how you guys were inflating your post counts so much
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 10:45:07 am
Quote from: "Bob Boblo"
I was wondering how you guys were inflating your post counts so much
Ask Blaggard. I honestly have no clue - it's just natural (like getting a boner)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 10:57:03 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Bob Boblo"
I was wondering how you guys were inflating your post counts so much
Ask Blaggard. I honestly have no clue - it's just natural (like getting a boner)

Combination of stimulants and boredom.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 12, 2010, 10:57:42 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Bob Boblo"
I was wondering how you guys were inflating your post counts so much
Ask Blaggard. I honestly have no clue - it's just natural (like getting a boner)

Combination of stimulants and boredom.
Wow! Then it's exactly like a boner
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 01:40:31 pm
Really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 03:15:12 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Blaggard"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Ask Blaggard. I honestly have no clue - it's just natural (like getting a boner)

Combination of stimulants and boredom.
Wow! Then it's exactly like a boner
Epic comeback.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 03:17:24 pm
You know it's bad when you get grief off people who joined a few days ago.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 03:56:43 pm
Ryan! Check the tap-thread...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:19:05 pm
He weren't "griefing" anyone; if anything, he's complimenting Alex for doing a fine job describing my fun time party organ.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 04:22:10 pm
"Alex" that is all
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:30:23 pm
Tru dat.  However I think Jake's getting to the point where he doesn't much care about it.  Jake is now Jake 'Alex' Pearlshire
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 04:32:15 pm
I think it annoy's him immensely and you might want to edit the start before an admin see's it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:36:29 pm
Edit what :P

Didn't see nuthink
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 04:38:04 pm
Me neither :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:40:07 pm
You didn't?

What didn't you do?

Was it important?

Do you have to see the special lady to clean your special area?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 04:42:17 pm
Yes, now what is the purpose of all these questions, are you some sort of spai
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 04:57:34 pm
I'm just making sure you forgot whatever it is that you forgot by forgetting it somehow.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 04:58:58 pm
At least i'm not doing a Mike the shemale and telling you off
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 05:26:36 pm
... Sorry, Jake, for calling you Alex. :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 05:27:18 pm
DO NOT APOLOGISE!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 05:28:53 pm
I apologise for apologising...
DAMN! I did it again!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 05:32:28 pm
YOUR ATTITUDE HAS GOT YOU IN THE INESCAPABLE CIRCLE :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 06:01:49 pm
He'll get out when he smacks a child with a chalk from 200 metres.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 06:14:09 pm
KABAM!
Felt good... Did it feel good for you too, Blaggard? Me hitting you with the chalk, 200 metres away? ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 06:22:21 pm
See, like a proper teacher, blaming the kid for what he does.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 06:42:23 pm
Hell yeah!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 06:44:34 pm
"The child accidentally fell onto my penis"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 06:48:18 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
"The child accidentally fell onto my penis"
Not really...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 07:23:57 pm
N'ah, what you want to do is lure them until they are 16 and no longer at the school.  Then give it er
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 07:39:32 pm
Well... When they're 16, that's basically when I start teaching them ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 07:44:57 pm
You're a A level maths teacher at a College?

Sneaky.  "I'm got some hard maths back here you can help me with."
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 08:39:52 pm
Dunno the equivalent, "upper secondary school" we call it. Guess that's College.
Well . . . ask away, if I can help you I will ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 08:54:07 pm
6th form or something.

I've drawn the equation behind my desk.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 09:28:02 pm
Type it out and I'll help you.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 11:08:22 pm
2+2
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 11:09:04 pm
=3
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 12, 2010, 11:10:50 pm
My soul is saved.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 12, 2010, 11:12:02 pm
You can thank me later
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 12, 2010, 11:27:54 pm
2+2=/=3
2+2=4.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 13, 2010, 12:15:44 am
p=np problem;
Let mathit{COMPOSITE} = {xin N:x=pq ;text{for integers}; p, q > 1 }  and R = {(x,y)in Ntimes N: 1<y leq sqrt x; ; ;y; text{divides}; x}.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 13, 2010, 12:20:19 am
(http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2008/10/26/633606480318759598-AHHHH.jpg)


No maths pl0x!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 13, 2010, 12:23:36 am
It's a programming problem.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 13, 2010, 08:01:41 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
It's a programming problem.
Yeah, long time since I programmed as a little comp.wiz. kid.
Guessing you don't have a serious maths problem.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 13, 2010, 08:11:00 am
well, it's a mathematical program.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 13, 2010, 08:18:23 am
Quote from: "Blaggard"
well, it's a mathematical program.
It is. But it is also disguised in a lot of programming mumbo-jumbo that I don't wanna go through again right now.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 13, 2010, 08:50:03 am
al right; but it was considered impossible to solve the p=pn problem.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 13, 2010, 10:40:21 am
I dont care. NO MATHS :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 13, 2010, 05:14:33 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
al right; but it was considered impossible to solve the p=pn problem.
OLOL?
I think I've solved crap like that.
All you have to do is guesstimate that it works, then you prove that it works for some examples, and then you can assume that it works for all examples - thus proving the rule.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 14, 2010, 07:08:55 pm
Do you like grapes?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 07:25:35 pm
From time to time. You?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 14, 2010, 07:26:59 pm
I love em :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 08:03:15 pm
G4U.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 14, 2010, 08:03:43 pm
Thank you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 08:03:59 pm
My pleasure.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 14, 2010, 08:04:42 pm
Whatever floats your boat
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 08:05:42 pm
Water. Water floats my boat... Or my boat floats on water ... I dunno.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 14, 2010, 08:18:39 pm
I don't have a boat :(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 08:19:43 pm
:( I got two. Can lend you one?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 14, 2010, 08:24:02 pm
I've never had a boat but I do have ships.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 08:26:18 pm
Nice... I guess... I wanna have a rocket ship. That would be nice.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 14, 2010, 08:27:24 pm
I'd have one powered by plasma
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 08:27:44 pm
ORLY? Can I borrow it, just over the weekend? PLEEEASE?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 14, 2010, 09:01:37 pm
It only works when it's in a vacuum.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: coram_boy on April 14, 2010, 09:15:32 pm
Figures, that.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: camcam on April 14, 2010, 09:19:11 pm
i win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 09:23:36 pm
Blag, you don't say? So I can't borrow it? :(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 14, 2010, 09:30:43 pm
i love  you too
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 14, 2010, 09:47:38 pm
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 15, 2010, 12:44:27 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Ninjas are better :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 15, 2010, 01:59:08 am
I endorse this message
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 15, 2010, 08:20:25 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Ninjas are better :ugeek:
alex is correct =O
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 10:56:14 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Ninjas are better :ugeek:
alex is correct =O
Yes, he is, I s'pose.
Now I feel sad about being a pirate...
But at least I dress in black and kick like hell - 75% pirate, 25% ninja.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 04:11:19 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Blag, you don't say? So I can't borrow it? :(
I'm also working on cold plasma shielding technology.  Able to shrug off high energy attacks in the light spectrum of things.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 15, 2010, 04:15:30 pm
But not love?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 04:17:59 pm
Nothing can repel love.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 15, 2010, 04:18:41 pm
Except from love itself.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 04:21:43 pm
Love vs Love!
Fight!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 15, 2010, 04:42:49 pm
who wins?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 04:46:12 pm
They end up kissing and shagging.  No-one knows who was the man.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 07:09:25 pm
You know...
Let's assume that the opposite of "love" is "hate", could also be called "-love".
If someone says they hate you really much, like "hate^2".
Then, by some logical reasoning and maths: "hate^2" = "(-love)^2" = "love^2"
What they're really saying is that they really love you.
Still with me?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 15, 2010, 07:10:27 pm
STFU!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 07:11:05 pm
Do you hate me, Ryan? Really hate me?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 07:23:31 pm
It is rather annoying attempting to be smart all the time.  We come here to not care and you try to make us think.  Quite the wrong environment.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 07:25:45 pm
Well. That's really my ambition as a teacher: make people think and reflect, and through that evolve to the next level.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 07:43:19 pm
it's not doing that.  It's sounding condescending half the time.  

If you want people to think and reflect you give them a real world problem which they can solve and you give them the tools to solve it.  If someone flounders you need to get them to explain to you what they need to do.  When you explain things to people they don't care, they give up.

Forcing people who've had enough of it elsewhere to have it here whilst you think it's enjoyable is quite off putting.  

To challenge peoples minds make a thread detailing a massive real world problem and don't give any indication of how to solve it.  You'll be amazed at what people will pull out of their ass.  Just because they cannot explain it in words or examples you teach em doesn't mean they don't understand the underlying theory.

And that logic shit was disregarded by our brains as "That's over the top, rationalising emotion will get you nowhere".
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 07:51:33 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
it's not doing that.  It's sounding condescending half the time.  

If you want people to think and reflect you give them a real world problem which they can solve and you give them the tools to solve it.  If someone flounders you need to get them to explain to you what they need to do.  When you explain things to people they don't care, they give up.

Forcing people who've had enough of it elsewhere to have it here whilst you think it's enjoyable is quite off putting.  

To challenge peoples minds make a thread detailing a massive real world problem and don't give any indication of how to solve it.  You'll be amazed at what people will pull out of their ass.  Just because they cannot explain it in words or examples you teach em doesn't mean they don't understand the underlying theory.

And that logic shit was disregarded by our brains as "That's over the top, rationalising emotion will get you nowhere".
Is it possible (in theory) to travel through time? Will it ever be possible?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 07:55:56 pm
How do I know if it's going to be possible?

Sounds like phooey to me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 08:18:34 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
How do I know if it's going to be possible?

Sounds like phooey to me.
Please try to work with me here.
What do you think? Guesstimate?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 15, 2010, 08:24:35 pm
Now what have i said about guesstimate.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 15, 2010, 08:30:51 pm
STOP IT RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are not allowed to use more than 5braincells here.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 08:45:57 pm
There is no such thing as "nothing".  Even in a vacuum particles are being brought into and out of the quantum froth; taken out when two particles get so close they form a black hole or too far apart where they force more into being.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 15, 2010, 09:01:41 pm
Right you, GTFO!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on April 15, 2010, 09:05:31 pm
AHOY THERE LASSIES! (in a brilliant Scottish accent)!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 15, 2010, 09:06:28 pm
it was a shit scottish accent
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on April 15, 2010, 09:07:50 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
it was a shit scottish accent
you can't know that unless you're in my room  :shock:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: benni hill on April 15, 2010, 09:08:46 pm
Ok it was just a guess
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 15, 2010, 09:09:49 pm
No i'm in the room, look behind you skillz




Hi
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 09:11:34 pm
But
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs#t=1m50s (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs#t=1m50s)
(http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/1/11/Fuckingmagnets.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 09:20:06 pm
Quote from: "Tortea"
STOP IT RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are not allowed to use more than 5braincells here.
I'm sorry...
So, what do you think about this "fourth dimension"-thing?
CRAP! I'm doing it again!

Skillz: Nice accent, I'm impressed.
/me trying the same phrase in my "Sean Connery"-accent.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 15, 2010, 10:27:12 pm
Magnets, how do they work?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 15, 2010, 11:43:23 pm
It's all about the "+"s wanting to get to the "-"s, and the "-"s wanna get to the "+"s.
Got it?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 16, 2010, 02:21:34 am
So magic?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 16, 2010, 08:36:48 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
No i'm in the room, look behind you skillz
Why am I not surprised?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 16, 2010, 10:59:00 am
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
No i'm in the room, look behind you skillz
Why am I not surprised?
Because you're in front of Skilz bent over
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 16, 2010, 12:00:53 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Peejik"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
No i'm in the room, look behind you skillz
Why am I not surprised?
Because you're in front of Skilz bent over
I LOL'd IRL. Nice one.

Quote from: "Blaggard"
So magic?
*sigh* Yes.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 17, 2010, 04:51:00 pm
*From inside the room: CLUNK CLUNK CLUNK*



*I walk away*
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 17, 2010, 05:10:31 pm
I hate seagulls.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 17, 2010, 10:44:10 pm
Me too. They were staring in the window of the room with Blag's, Skillz's, and Peej's orgy
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bob the terrorist on April 17, 2010, 10:44:41 pm
So this is how jake gets his spam count up :?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 17, 2010, 10:50:37 pm
Quote from: "Bob the terrorist"
So this is how jake gets his spam count up :?
Yes. It's the way I roll
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 17, 2010, 11:04:56 pm
Back to topic: I really hate seagulls.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 17, 2010, 11:11:58 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Back to topic: I really hate seagulls.
Did they tape it and show it to you?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 17, 2010, 11:16:22 pm
Something like that, yes :(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 17, 2010, 11:20:37 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Something like that, yes :(
There's good news, don't worry. You can use the handicap parking spot now :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 18, 2010, 12:09:22 am
Magic
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 18, 2010, 12:29:12 am
Tricks!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on April 19, 2010, 04:08:42 pm
Black Mgaic
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Horice P Fossil on April 19, 2010, 04:23:41 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZbAdP7v5Q (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZbAdP7v5Q)

Haz i won ?

Horice  ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 19, 2010, 04:38:05 pm
Nope. Not yet.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 01:16:25 am
"But I do know one thing though, bitches, they come they go
Saturday through Sunday, Monday, Monday through Sunday yo'"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 20, 2010, 01:39:46 am
Don't be playa hatin'
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 01:48:01 am
Quote from: "anarchist13"
Don't be playa hatin'
Oh i will be.

Btw is this a good pick up line for asking out someone (tell teh truth b/c then you'll see less of me)?

"Do you have any raisins? What about a date?"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 20, 2010, 01:50:50 am
My favourite pick - up line is 'does this rag smell of choloroform to you?'

But I don't get yours :p
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 01:53:02 am
Quote from: "anarchist13"
My favourite pick - up line is 'does this rag smell of choloroform to you?'

But I don't get yours :p
*headdesk*


... did you read it? Date as in a date
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 07:14:47 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
... did you read it? Date as in a date
Haha! Now I get it. Nice one!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bytes on April 20, 2010, 09:37:49 pm
We definitely need a random pick up lines thread...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 09:41:08 pm
True. Make it happen :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Horice P Fossil on April 20, 2010, 09:46:33 pm
I have the old thread at my place,why not come back for coffee and we can take a look  ;)

Horice  :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 09:50:34 pm
I thank you for the offer, but "I don't drink coffee, I take tea, my dear".
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 09:53:45 pm
I too am not found of this liquid
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 10:03:50 pm
You mean coffee, right?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:08:02 pm
ofc, what else could i possibly mean.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 10:20:58 pm
I dunno, tea? :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:22:27 pm
Ohhh so your a bee-keeper
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 10:28:17 pm
Well. Almost, remove the "bee-" from "bee-keeper" and you'll have it right there.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:29:03 pm
Can i replace the bee with goal
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 10:29:28 pm
No, sadly :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:30:44 pm
Nothing can stop with, i have the pope's blessing.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 10:33:48 pm
Orly? Which Pope?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:36:16 pm
But i was going to do that :(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 10:38:48 pm
Too bad I'm as quick as lightning then ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:40:52 pm
The last lightening i saw  was quicker than 3mins 4sec
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 10:46:32 pm
"Am I happy to see you, or did I just put a canoe in my pocket?"
- Lord Flashheart
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:47:06 pm
*logs off*
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 10:48:07 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
*logs off*
:D

PARTY TIME
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:48:56 pm
I'm you sure you and your hand will have a lovely time.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 10:51:18 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I'm you sure you and your hand will have a lovely time.
It was a pick up line. WAI ARE YOU SUGGESTING -  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:52:24 pm
You like your men with a cock don't you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 10:53:29 pm
I like women with titties and an ass. Then comes personality
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:54:22 pm
Learn to grammar.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 10:54:42 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Learn to grammar
Read again.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:55:21 pm
I still don't see a full stop.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 10:56:39 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I still don't see a full stop.
Bitch please! I really don't need that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 10:59:09 pm
Bitch please! I'm not the one who started this.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 11:00:11 pm
Whatever. Is it your job to be painfully annoying? If so, you should be getting a high salary
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 20, 2010, 11:02:19 pm
Yep that's the sole reason i am here.

(http://ts4.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1759174597615&id=84ccb85ca0e7de4724f607f566420b1d&url=http%3a%2f%2ffarm4.static.flickr.com%2f3510%2f3796184159_98a6164e78_b.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 20, 2010, 11:39:25 pm
LOL. Jake is kicking Ryan's butt!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 20, 2010, 11:55:48 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
LOL. Jake is kicking Ryan's butt!
Too true not to get sig'd
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 21, 2010, 12:54:48 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
LOL. Jake is kicking Ryan's butt!
Too true not to get sig'd
Well, TY. I'm honoured.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 21, 2010, 03:35:28 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
LOL. Jake is kicking Ryan's butt!
Too true not to get sig'd
Well, TY. I'm honoured.
:lol:  :roll:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 21, 2010, 06:05:33 pm
You're sooo jealous, RB ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 21, 2010, 06:10:48 pm
I'm very jealous of what you and "jake" have going on.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 21, 2010, 10:43:05 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I'm very jealous of what you and "jake" have going on.
It's not anal sex with my 12 inch penis. You should thank me for relieving you of that jealousy.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 21, 2010, 10:44:11 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I'm very jealous of what you and "jake" have going on.
It's not anal sex with my 12 inch penis.

Such a child  :roll:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on April 21, 2010, 10:48:31 pm
/me interrupts extremely intellectual conversation
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Peejik on April 21, 2010, 10:57:33 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I'm very jealous of what you and [s:u2jsquq4]"jake"[/s:u2jsquq4] alex have going on.
God damn Ryan, it's alex
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 21, 2010, 11:01:03 pm
That's why i used quotation marks
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 21, 2010, 11:01:51 pm
:roll:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 21, 2010, 11:02:57 pm
:|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 21, 2010, 11:07:32 pm
;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 21, 2010, 11:08:19 pm
:?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 21, 2010, 11:10:37 pm
:twisted:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 21, 2010, 11:16:03 pm
:mrgreen:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 21, 2010, 11:22:56 pm
:shock:  :D


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Baron von Awesome on April 22, 2010, 02:42:45 am
WINRAR
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 22, 2010, 03:05:19 am
Not bitch
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 22, 2010, 11:29:56 am
Hola!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 22, 2010, 08:30:11 pm
You stole my stars idea. You give 'em back or pay 1 gold (or get shot)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 22, 2010, 08:50:50 pm
STFU. I Googled... Show me your copywrite on the stars, and I'll pay you the gold - in fists.
:D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 22, 2010, 08:59:54 pm
Lulz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 22, 2010, 09:08:35 pm
Google is my friend.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jazzaa on April 22, 2010, 10:04:30 pm
........
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 22, 2010, 10:30:21 pm
Bond, Jazzaa Bond? :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 23, 2010, 12:08:26 am
:|


Oh and:


:ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 23, 2010, 01:52:23 pm
LOL. Now I see it... I have picked the same colours as you, didn't even notice that, LOL.
Purple and green goes well together.
And, in my defence, my middle star is "lime" while your is "green", thus no trademark infringement.
Have a nice day, thanks for trying.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 23, 2010, 02:22:27 pm
I can has win now?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 23, 2010, 05:31:46 pm
Ima steal stars idea
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 23, 2010, 06:08:05 pm
Haha, I love it Avlana.
Jake's gonna hit the roof :D
Edit: "hot"="hit"
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on April 24, 2010, 11:18:42 am
(http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/5/13/ohaiyoujust128552084557608145.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 24, 2010, 11:27:27 am
Such a cute cat :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 24, 2010, 01:26:18 pm
Lulz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 24, 2010, 01:26:33 pm
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Lulz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 24, 2010, 01:26:49 pm
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Lulz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 24, 2010, 01:27:06 pm
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Lulz.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 24, 2010, 02:34:56 pm
Ha! "You may embed only 3 quotes within each other."
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 24, 2010, 03:56:09 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Ha! "You may embed only 3 quotes within each other."
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 24, 2010, 03:56:24 pm
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Ha! "You may embed only 3 quotes within each other."
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 24, 2010, 03:56:40 pm
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Ha! "You may embed only 3 quotes within each other."
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Blaggard on April 24, 2010, 04:10:47 pm
That's just sad.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 24, 2010, 04:53:22 pm
Quote from: "Blaggard"
That's just sad.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 24, 2010, 05:47:26 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
LOL. Now I see it... I have picked the same colours as you, didn't even notice that, LOL.
Purple and green goes well together.
And, in my defence, my middle star is "lime" while your is "green", thus no trademark infringement.
Have a nice day, thanks for trying.
Wait a second:
Quote
Manipulation of the trademark will result in the same penalties as using the trademark itself.
Tell you what - pick between 1 GBP a day or 1 gold immediate payment. Your choice (just made things easier for you motherfucka) (http://i32.tinypic.com/e6omir.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 24, 2010, 08:45:27 pm
Aw, crap. You really got me there!
The fact that I got 6 stars, and you only got 3 stars wasn't obvious enough I guess?
Neither the fact that your stars are assymetrical, while mine are symetrical?
Your move.
If you like to continue this farce, I'm sorry to inform you that I must sue you (which probably will turn out costly for you).
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 24, 2010, 08:46:46 pm
HAWHAWHAW LOOK AT MEH WITH MA BOOTIFUL SEXEH STARS 8-)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 24, 2010, 08:49:08 pm
I think he's ignoring you...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 24, 2010, 09:17:47 pm
I'd never ignore Avlana, but you did something totally different. Loyosi's was WAY TOO CLOSE TO MINE

I was working on my new avatar (I didn't even use photoshop)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 24, 2010, 09:58:53 pm
Well... I don't agree.
Don't like the new avatar, sorry...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 24, 2010, 10:01:45 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Well... I don't agree.
Don't like the new avatar, sorry...
Why? Because it's not colorful?


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 24, 2010, 10:05:05 pm
It's growing on me...
I'd say ... 5/10?
It's because it looks a bit boring, perhaps it's a 3D image and I need some glasses?
No, it's because there's too much white in it, actually :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 24, 2010, 10:09:01 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
It's growing on me...
I'd say ... 5/10?
It's because it looks a bit boring, perhaps it's a 3D image and I need some glasses?
No, it's because there's too much white in it, actually :)
Cool. Make it more black for ya
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 24, 2010, 10:14:03 pm
Nevermind, no. It's look like shit
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 02:16:27 am
Nah, I think it looks cool by now. Perhaps it has grown on me.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 05:57:59 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Nah, I think it looks cool by now. Perhaps it has grown on me.

I should have that effect
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Taytaz on April 25, 2010, 08:14:43 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
the black guy has a name and it is 2pac! :P
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 09:30:29 am
2pac.
Sorry to break it for you, but I hear he's dead.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Taytaz on April 25, 2010, 09:57:45 am
i heard he went out with a bang
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 10:11:45 am
Yeah, I guess so :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 25, 2010, 11:19:13 am
Quote from: "Taytaz"
i heard he went out with a bang

oh i see what you did there  8-)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 12:03:09 pm
Ryan: I think we all saw it. But, I'll give you a cookie. *Gives cookie*
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 25, 2010, 12:04:26 pm
:| Typical patronising trainee teacher  :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 12:06:56 pm
Shut up, biatch.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 04:42:05 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
2pac.
Sorry to break it for you, but I hear he's dead.
He's not. He's in hiding. See this (http://www.knowledgesutra.com/index.php/tupac-shakur-alive_t20986.html), and this (http://www.tupac4u.de/english/alive.htm) for more info
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 04:55:17 pm
2Pac's dead
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 05:03:33 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
2Pac's alive
Fix'd.


Did you read what was on both of the sites?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 05:04:22 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"


Did you read what was on both of the sites?
Yes. It's bullshit
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 05:06:03 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"


Did you read what was on both of the sites?
Yes. It's bullshit
Where's the evidence he died?



There's also this (http://www.inreview.com/archive/topic/24163.html)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 05:13:08 pm
Prove Michael Jackson is dead
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 05:13:58 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Prove Michael Jackson is dead
He's also in hiding
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 05:14:24 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Prove Michael Jackson is dead
He's also in hiding
Now you're being a fgt
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 05:16:23 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Prove Michael Jackson is dead
He's also in hiding
Now you're being a fgt
Thanks for warning me :D . I'll stop



Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 05:35:14 pm
2Pac is dead
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 05:43:51 pm
:evil:


Don't believe it. He even said he wanted to be buried (in many songs), and he was "cremated". Also, who cremates a body 2 days after the murder? Apparently 2Pac's was according to the news :|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 05:50:22 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
:evil:


Don't believe it. He even said he wanted to be buried (in many songs), and he was "cremated". Also, who cremates a body 2 days after the murder? Apparently 2Pac's was according to the news :|
In Islam they bury the body the day after. It's not uncommon. Don't you think they'd want to make it look realistic?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 05:53:26 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
:evil:


Don't believe it. He even said he wanted to be buried (in many songs), and he was "cremated". Also, who cremates a body 2 days after the murder? Apparently 2Pac's was according to the news :|
In Islam they bury the body the day after. It's not uncommon. Don't you think they'd want to make it look realistic?
1. He was murdered, so why would you burn all evidence of who murdered him 2 days after it happened?
2. He never wanted to be cremated and mentioned being buried in a lot of his songs
3. Make what look realistic?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 05:57:36 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
:evil:


Don't believe it. He even said he wanted to be buried (in many songs), and he was "cremated". Also, who cremates a body 2 days after the murder? Apparently 2Pac's was according to the news :|
In Islam they bury the body the day after. It's not uncommon. Don't you think they'd want to make it look realistic?
1. He was murdered, so why would you burn all evidence of who murdered him 2 days after it happened?
2. He never wanted to be cremated and mentioned being buried in a lot of his songs
3. Make what look realistic?
The guy who shot him was a policeman, who did it because 2Pac just killed someone else. If they wanted to keep it a secret, why wouldn't they make it look really realistic and bury him several days later, or a week or two?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 06:02:01 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
In Islam they bury the body the day after. It's not uncommon. Don't you think they'd want to make it look realistic?
1. He was murdered, so why would you burn all evidence of who murdered him 2 days after it happened?
2. He never wanted to be cremated and mentioned being buried in a lot of his songs
3. Make what look realistic?
The guy who shot him was a policeman, who did it because 2Pac just killed someone else. If they wanted to keep it a secret, why wouldn't they make it look really realistic and bury him several days later, or a week or two?
It would inevitably be found out, so why were they so discreet?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 06:11:40 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It would inevitably be found out, so why were they so discreet?
Cos he was famous.
You're jumping to conclusions
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 06:18:50 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It would inevitably be found out, so why were they so discreet?
Cos he was famous.
You're jumping to conclusions
Of course I am :ugeek:

But really, where was the evidence he died?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 06:26:18 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It would inevitably be found out, so why were they so discreet?
Cos he was famous.
You're jumping to conclusions
Of course I am :ugeek:

But really, where was the evidence he died?
Where was the evidence JFK died?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 06:32:27 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Cos he was famous.
You're jumping to conclusions
Of course I am :ugeek:

But really, where was the evidence he died?
Where was the evidence JFK died?
It was live on tv :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 06:39:52 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It was live on tv :ugeek:
Apart from that






Wait, really?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 06:47:16 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It was live on tv :ugeek:
Apart from that






Wait, really?
Yes (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5cCzDbtVnM). I think I won that argument
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 06:51:02 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It was live on tv :ugeek:
Apart from that






Wait, really?
Yes (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5cCzDbtVnM). I think I won that argument
Elvis Presley then
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 06:56:11 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Apart from that






Wait, really?
Yes (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5cCzDbtVnM). I think I won that argument
Elvis Presley then
Why the flower would I know?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 07:10:17 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Why the flower would I know?
exactly
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 07:13:54 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Why the flower would I know?
exactly
Touché
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 07:25:44 pm
Come on, dudes...

Elvis: Alive.
JFK: Dead.
Tupac: I dunno, don't care. Hope he's alive so Jake will be happy...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 07:26:50 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Come on, dudes...

Elvis: Alive.
JFK: Dead.
Tupac: I dunno, don't care. Hope he's alive so Jake will be happy...
Fair enough. I'm still positive 2Pac is alive. Too many coincidences for him not to be
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 07:28:52 pm
I hope he is, for your sake.
But if he is alive, why doesn't he keep making music? :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 07:30:33 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I hope he is, for your sake.
But if he is alive, why doesn't he keep making music? :D
He's in hiding. He made this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ3Bl3AppIo) though
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 07:36:49 pm
Elvis: Dead
JFK: Dead
2Pac: Dead
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 07:40:36 pm
Eminem took his place (but 2Pac is still alive)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 07:59:46 pm
Jake, why did you resign?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 08:02:47 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Jake, why did you resign?
B/c there's no point being MP for the last day, when you get 50 alerts. That's why
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 25, 2010, 08:35:29 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Jake, why did you resign?
B/c there's no point being MP for the last day, when you get 50 alerts. That's why
50 alerts?
How about all the fake proposals?
And the MOARRRRR power?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 08:39:41 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Jake, why did you resign?
B/c there's no point being MP for the last day, when you get 50 alerts. That's why
50 alerts?
How about all the fake proposals?
And the MOARRRRR power?
Idk.... I need to esleep I guess
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 25, 2010, 10:31:30 pm
"esleep", nice one :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 25, 2010, 10:50:42 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"esleep", nice one :D
 :|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 10:51:52 pm
wat
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 25, 2010, 10:52:42 pm
I don't think it was a "nice one" or very funny, it made me do my smiley.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 10:56:06 pm
I see.


And your mum made me do this (http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs36/f/2008/280/7/d/Erupting_Volcano_Icon_by_CrisAvatars.gif)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 25, 2010, 10:58:04 pm
What fire larva from a volcano :|
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 25, 2010, 11:00:36 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
What fire larva from a volcano :|
think hard and you'll get it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 25, 2010, 11:01:54 pm
I knew the second i saw it, just didn't find it amusing.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 12:21:02 am
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"esleep", nice one :D
 :|
Nice smiley you got there.

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 12:29:43 am
Wait, I saw something round the corner

It was me winning.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 12:45:31 am
Oh, really? You don't say?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 12:51:39 am
I do say,

I say it hard. And fast.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 12:52:39 am
Both of you are wrong bitches
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 01:07:30 am
I am the messiah!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 01:11:13 am
Doubt it :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 01:18:58 am
i'm not being 4gone just over here now. outside being rounded on wednesday

http://forums.erepublik.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=341&t=36975
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 01:38:38 am
I see. I still don't believe you
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 01:40:08 am
Well, maybe I'll be more coherent.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 09:01:53 am
Jake, you fool. I never said I was the winner, so you can't really say "both"...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 10:47:12 am
True. But you get what I was saying
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 03:15:23 pm
Yeah, I "got" it... Past tense.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: hazz on April 26, 2010, 08:22:44 pm
darn. was hoping this thread had been forgotten so i could crown myself WINNAR o/o/o/
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Malgudi on April 26, 2010, 08:23:59 pm
no way im gone win(man works better with voice)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 09:13:20 pm
Quote from: "Malgudi"
no way im gone win(man works better with voice)
Say it again, please, this time in English?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Bytes on April 26, 2010, 09:21:22 pm
Win, the End.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 09:23:21 pm
or not
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 09:32:26 pm
Jake :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 09:46:09 pm
:|


Slept through 3 classes today. It was shite
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 10:09:14 pm
I cannot (as a teacher) approve of that, young man :(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 10:15:51 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I cannot (as a teacher) approve of that, young man :(
You're a teacher?


....

....


....


.....



....


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 10:17:08 pm
Well... I twisted the truth there a tiny bit.
Got about 1 year left, then I'll be a certified teacher, still in training.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 10:18:45 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Well... I twisted the truth there a tiny bit.
Got about 1 year left, then I'll be a certified teacher, still in training.
Okay. Do you teach lower, middle, or upper school?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 10:23:19 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Well... I twisted the truth there a tiny bit.
Got about 1 year left, then I'll be a certified teacher, still in training.
Okay. Do you teach lower, middle, or upper school?
Upper secondary. Ages 16-18. Think you Americans call it "College"?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 10:27:07 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Well... I twisted the truth there a tiny bit.
Got about 1 year left, then I'll be a certified teacher, still in training.
Okay. Do you teach lower, middle, or upper school?
Upper secondary. Ages 16-18. Think you Americans call it "College"?
No. That's definitely upper school (that's for us sophomores to seniors and a couple of freshmen)

Anyway, my english teacher is very anticommunist and I hate it. She was talking about a Marxist way of anayzing literature, and someone asked who Karl Marx was (http://www.ottawahondaclub.com/forum/Smileys/ohc/facepalm.gif). So she explained communism and said everything a capitalist would argue about it. Then someone asked for a communist argument, and she gave the worst example. Then I was gonna raise my hand, and I said, "A better argument would be...", and she went "That's enough about Marxism. Let's move on to a feminist way of analyzing literature."

I felt like strangling a baby
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 10:30:04 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
No. That's definitely upper school (that's for us sophomores to seniors and a couple of freshmen)

Anyway, my english teacher is very anticommunist and I hate it. She was talking about a Marxist way of anayzing literature, and someone asked who Karl Marx was (http://www.ottawahondaclub.com/forum/Smileys/ohc/facepalm.gif). So she explained communism and said everything a capitalist would argue about it. Then someone asked for a communist argument, and she gave the worst example. Then I was gonna raise my hand, and I said, "A better argument would be...", and she went "That's enough about Marxism. Let's move on to a feminist way of analyzing literature."

I felt like strangling a baby
I see.
I love analysing literature. I'm sad to admit that I too dislikes communism, but that's really unprofessional what she did there.
Also, communism =/= Marxism (at least I don't think so).
You should write your essay (I guess there's an essay coming?) from the Marxist viewpoints :)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 10:31:22 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
No. That's definitely upper school (that's for us sophomores to seniors and a couple of freshmen)

Anyway, my english teacher is very anticommunist and I hate it. She was talking about a Marxist way of anayzing literature, and someone asked who Karl Marx was (http://www.ottawahondaclub.com/forum/Smileys/ohc/facepalm.gif). So she explained communism and said everything a capitalist would argue about it. Then someone asked for a communist argument, and she gave the worst example. Then I was gonna raise my hand, and I said, "A better argument would be...", and she went "That's enough about Marxism. Let's move on to a feminist way of analyzing literature."

I felt like strangling a baby
I see.
I love analysing literature. I'm sad to admit that I too dislikes communism, but that's really unprofessional what she did there.
Also, communism =/= Marxism (at least I don't think so).
You should write your essay (I guess there's an essay coming?) from the Marxist viewpoints :)
I will, but we're actually studying a book. She was just showing the history of analyzing literature, and we stumbled on that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 10:32:45 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I will, but we're actually studying a book. She was just showing the history of analyzing literature, and we stumbled on that
Hm.
Which book is it? Or is it a "study book"/"class book"/"course book"?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 10:35:28 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I will, but we're actually studying a book. She was just showing the history of analyzing literature, and we stumbled on that
Hm.
Which book is it? Or is it a "study book"/"class book"/"course book"?
Betsy Brown. It's shiitake mushrooms
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 10:38:35 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
I will, but we're actually studying a book. She was just showing the history of analyzing literature, and we stumbled on that
Hm.
Which book is it? Or is it a "study book"/"class book"/"course book"?
Betsy Brown. It's shiitake mushrooms
"Dignity in the Home" (http://www.poets.org/m/dsp_poem.php?prmMID=16279)
She doesn't seem very good.
Read any Shakespeare? (Of course you have. Which works?)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 10:44:51 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Hm.
Which book is it? Or is it a "study book"/"class book"/"course book"?
Betsy Brown. It's shiitake mushrooms
"Dignity in the Home" (http://www.poets.org/m/dsp_poem.php?prmMID=16279)
She doesn't seem very good.
Read any Shakespeare? (Of course you have. Which works?)
Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet. That's it so far...

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 11:04:42 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet. That's it so far...

You liked any of it?

Well, guess I failed quite hard there. But I guess it was because my speed reading of Wikipedia stated "Betsy Brown" was a person...
What's the book about, then?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 11:08:02 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet. That's it so far...

You liked any of it?

Well, guess I failed quite hard there. But I guess it was because my speed reading of Wikipedia stated "Betsy Brown" was a person...
What's the book about, then?
The person in 8th grade. It's shit (they give u all these books aimed at girls and almost none aimed for guys :( ). Macebeth was great. R&J - meh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 11:11:23 pm
Richard III is okay.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 11:11:52 pm
I'm afraid I've only read R&J. But Macbeth looks promising :D
Guess Richard III is a good one as well. I need to catch up on my Shakespeare.

Naw, girly books... I understand how boring it must be for you if you're not into that kind of stuff.
I read quite a bit of Nancy Drew books when I was like 10. I liked them actually.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 11:17:37 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I'm afraid I've only read R&J. But Macbeth looks promising :D
Guess Richard III is a good one as well. I need to catch up on my Shakespeare.

Naw, girly books... I understand how boring it must be for you if you're not into that kind of stuff.
I read quite a bit of Nancy Drew books when I was like 10. I liked them actually.
Nancy Drew vs Betsy Brown - Nancy Drew DESTROYS Betsy Brown. It's not a murder case, it's the life of a girl who is one of the few blacks at Little Rock High, and her experience in 8th grade. Nothing happens... at all
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 11:26:24 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I'm afraid I've only read R&J. But Macbeth looks promising :D
Guess Richard III is a good one as well. I need to catch up on my Shakespeare.

Naw, girly books... I understand how boring it must be for you if you're not into that kind of stuff.
I read quite a bit of Nancy Drew books when I was like 10. I liked them actually.
Nancy Drew vs Betsy Brown - Nancy Drew DESTROYS Betsy Brown. It's not a murder case, it's the life of a girl who is one of the few blacks at Little Rock High, and her experience in 8th grade. Nothing happens... at all
Not even some daily racism?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 11:27:14 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I'm afraid I've only read R&J. But Macbeth looks promising :D
Guess Richard III is a good one as well. I need to catch up on my Shakespeare.

Naw, girly books... I understand how boring it must be for you if you're not into that kind of stuff.
I read quite a bit of Nancy Drew books when I was like 10. I liked them actually.
Nancy Drew vs Betsy Brown - Nancy Drew DESTROYS Betsy Brown. It's not a murder case, it's the life of a girl who is one of the few blacks at Little Rock High, and her experience in 8th grade. Nothing happens... at all
Not even some daily racism?
A little, but there's more boring shit, like what happens at home
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 11:29:08 pm
Is it just me or is it too srs in here all of a sudden.

/me strips
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 11:36:44 pm
/me lolz

this is evidence I can have an intelligent conversation
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on April 26, 2010, 11:37:28 pm
WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO JAKE!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 26, 2010, 11:38:12 pm
It's amazing
I might bookmark it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 11:40:23 pm
:D


Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 11:44:56 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
:D


That's my thing, dawg ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 11:45:48 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
:D


That's my thing, dawg ;)
Coincidentally, I was listening to RAC...... something's happening to me and it's not puberty (that happened 2 years ago)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 26, 2010, 11:47:27 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
:D


That's my thing, dawg ;)
Coincidentally, I was listening to RAC...... something's happening to me and it's not puberty (that happened 2 years ago)
Alright... Take it easy...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 26, 2010, 11:48:38 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
That's my thing, dawg ;)
Coincidentally, I was listening to RAC...... something's happening to me and it's not puberty (that happened 2 years ago)
Alright... Take it easy...
It's good shit yo
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 27, 2010, 12:04:18 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It's good shit yo
Somehow I doubt it...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 27, 2010, 12:06:43 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It's good shit yo
Somehow I doubt it...
It surprisingly is. You don't have to be a commie to appreciate it
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 27, 2010, 12:13:27 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
It's good shit yo
Somehow I doubt it...
It surprisingly is. You don't have to be a commie to appreciate it
I hear it's quite racist as well.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 27, 2010, 12:43:57 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Somehow I doubt it...
It surprisingly is. You don't have to be a commie to appreciate it
I hear it's quite racist as well.
Bitch please! I understand a lot of it and I have not picked up anything racist
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 27, 2010, 12:57:44 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Bitch please! I understand a lot of it and I have not picked up anything racist
OK, if you say so. I don't listen to it myself, so I wouldn't know.

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 27, 2010, 12:59:58 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Bitch please! I understand a lot of it and I have not picked up anything racist
OK, if you say so. I don't listen to it myself, so I wouldn't know.

Make special thread for 1000 or else u fail
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 27, 2010, 05:50:43 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Bitch please! I understand a lot of it and I have not picked up anything racist
OK, if you say so. I don't listen to it myself, so I wouldn't know.

Make special thread for 1000 or else u fail
Nah, I'm not that ego.

Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on April 27, 2010, 10:34:07 am
wineh
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 27, 2010, 10:41:13 am
Quote from: "jack west jr"
wineh
What the flower happened to you?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on April 27, 2010, 10:48:54 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "jack west jr"
wineh
What the flower happened to you?
had school and needed to study, sorry I know you miised me,jk
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 27, 2010, 10:50:50 am
Quote from: "jack west jr"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "jack west jr"
wineh
What the flower happened to you?
had school and needed to study, sorry I know you miised me,jk
Didn't miss you as much as I wondered wtf happened

Either way, you're back. How are the kangaroos?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: jack west jr on April 27, 2010, 11:13:28 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Either way, you're back. How are the kangaroos?
Great on the bbq
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 27, 2010, 02:04:32 pm
FM2010.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 27, 2010, 08:44:01 pm
Quote from: "jack west jr"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Either way, you're back. How are the kangaroos?
Great on the bbq
What about fried?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 27, 2010, 11:58:07 pm
Kick-Ass, the movie, watch it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 28, 2010, 12:00:26 am
Want to badly

Is it Rated R?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 28, 2010, 12:05:35 am
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
A perfect 10/10 movie.
Some parts of it was so good and fantastic that I couldn't help to fall in love with it.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 28, 2010, 12:08:23 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
A perfect 10/10 movie.
Some parts of it was so good and fantastic that I couldn't help to fall in love with it.
flower

I'll get my neighbor to take me
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 28, 2010, 12:10:48 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
A perfect 10/10 movie.
Some parts of it was so good and fantastic that I couldn't help to fall in love with it.
flower

I'll get my neighbor to take me
It was so awesome, I guess it was the best movie I've seen this year so far.
Also guessing it might be the best movie of this year.
Another epic movie tip: Taken (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0936501/), (as far as I can remember) the best movie of 2008.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 28, 2010, 12:14:19 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
A perfect 10/10 movie.
Some parts of it was so good and fantastic that I couldn't help to fall in love with it.
flower

I'll get my neighbor to take me
It was so awesome, I guess it was the best movie I've seen this year so far.
Also guessing it might be the best movie of this year.
Another epic movie tip: Taken (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0936501/), (as far as I can remember) the best movie of 2008.
That. was. 3P1C
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 28, 2010, 08:57:11 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
That. was. 3P1C
Taken? Yeah, sure was...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 28, 2010, 10:43:14 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
That. was. 3P1C
Taken? Yeah, sure was...
He fought against a cause worth fighting against
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Taytaz on April 28, 2010, 11:17:10 am
the ukrp?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 28, 2010, 01:42:04 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
That. was. 3P1C
Taken? Yeah, sure was...
He fought against a cause worth fighting against
Yeah. And he fought against it while being very manly as well.
A typical guy action film, but a mile above the typical standard.

BTW:
Quote from: "Taytaz"
the ukrp?
First post on the 100th page. Congrats.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 29, 2010, 06:47:30 pm
I have two reponses to this-
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."

1)
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."

2)
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
OH NO. INVOLVING CHILDREN. THAT MAKES IT SO MUCH WORSE
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 29, 2010, 06:54:40 pm
I have but one response:
"No child nudity appeared in it."
In fact, I hardly call the "nudity" that did appear "nudity".

SPOILER:
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 29, 2010, 06:55:43 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
In fact, I hardly call the "nudity" that did appear "nudity".
What was it?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 29, 2010, 07:05:42 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
In fact, I hardly call the "nudity" that did appear "nudity".
What was it?
It was "Christian Catholic nudity".
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 29, 2010, 07:13:15 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
In fact, I hardly call the "nudity" that did appear "nudity".
What was it?
It was "Christian Catholic nudity".
Ooooo, nun fun?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on April 29, 2010, 07:15:28 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
A perfect 10/10 movie.
Some parts of it was so good and fantastic that I couldn't help to fall in love with it.
have you read what the Daily Mail says about it?  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 29, 2010, 07:31:57 pm
Quote from: "Tony Bird"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
A perfect 10/10 movie.
Some parts of it was so good and fantastic that I couldn't help to fall in love with it.
have you read what the Daily Mail says about it?  :lol:
This should be entertaining..
Do tell
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on April 29, 2010, 07:35:27 pm
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
Quote from: "Tony Bird"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
"Rated R for strong brutal violence throughout, pervasive language, sexual content, nudity and some drug use - some involving children."
A perfect 10/10 movie.
Some parts of it was so good and fantastic that I couldn't help to fall in love with it.
have you read what the Daily Mail says about it?  :lol:
This should be entertaining..
Do tell
Here, hope you have a laugh. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/reviews/article-1262948/Kick-Ass-Dont-fooled-hype--This-crime-cinema-twisted-cynical-revels-abuse-childhood.html)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on April 29, 2010, 08:20:29 pm
What a fucking awesome question (http://www.chacha.com/community/1713043/how-can-i-be-like-altaiair) ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on April 29, 2010, 08:24:01 pm
tempted to troll answer...but nahhh :p
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on April 29, 2010, 08:51:43 pm
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOLOOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLDAILYMAILFAIL
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 29, 2010, 09:50:27 pm
Quote from: "Tony Bird"
Here, hope you have a laugh. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/reviews/article-1262948/Kick-Ass-Dont-fooled-hype--This-crime-cinema-twisted-cynical-revels-abuse-childhood.html)
**** me! What an idiot! Don't be fooled...
It's a wonderful movie, he/she (didn't check) should stop taking it so seriously!
I makes me kind of glad though, I might have a shot at becoming a film critic for the Daily Mail.
Go and see it with an open mind, you won't be disappointed.
Sure, it twists the original movie clichés in a way that both terrifies you (at first) but then you begin to love it (since you don't know what will happen next).
It's a serious movie in a way, but even more so it's a bizarre parody on the traditional film clichés which you can't do anything else than love.
... I better stop praising it, I should get paid for this :(
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on April 30, 2010, 02:31:55 am
TL;DR
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 30, 2010, 12:52:14 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
TL;DR
Do. It's worthwhile.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on April 30, 2010, 04:43:48 pm
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Tony Bird"
Here, hope you have a laugh. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/reviews/article-1262948/Kick-Ass-Dont-fooled-hype--This-crime-cinema-twisted-cynical-revels-abuse-childhood.html)
**** me! What an idiot! Don't be fooled...
It's a wonderful movie, he/she (didn't check) should stop taking it so seriously!
I makes me kind of glad though, I might have a shot at becoming a film critic for the Daily Mail.
Go and see it with an open mind, you won't be disappointed.
Sure, it twists the original movie clichés in a way that both terrifies you (at first) but then you begin to love it (since you don't know what will happen next).
It's a serious movie in a way, but even more so it's a bizarre parody on the traditional film clichés which you can't do anything else than love.
... I better stop praising it, I should get paid for this :(
I wasn't taking it seriously, I just posted it here becsue it was funny.  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on April 30, 2010, 05:25:05 pm
Quote from: "Tony Bird"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Quote from: "Tony Bird"
Here, hope you have a laugh. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/reviews/article-1262948/Kick-Ass-Dont-fooled-hype--This-crime-cinema-twisted-cynical-revels-abuse-childhood.html)
**** me! What an idiot! Don't be fooled...
It's a wonderful movie, he/she (didn't check) should stop taking it so seriously!
I makes me kind of glad though, I might have a shot at becoming a film critic for the Daily Mail.
Go and see it with an open mind, you won't be disappointed.
Sure, it twists the original movie clichés in a way that both terrifies you (at first) but then you begin to love it (since you don't know what will happen next).
It's a serious movie in a way, but even more so it's a bizarre parody on the traditional film clichés which you can't do anything else than love.
... I better stop praising it, I should get paid for this :(
I wasn't taking it seriously, I just posted it here becsue it was funny.  :lol:
I know... But I still felt I had to defend the film against that shite.
BTW, really funny avatar :D I LOL'd.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tom S 13 on May 01, 2010, 03:25:53 am
.... :D  :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 01, 2010, 04:10:29 am
Party time! :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on May 01, 2010, 09:27:15 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I know... But I still felt I had to defend the film against that shite.
BTW, really funny avatar :D I LOL'd.
Remember, it was in the Daily Mail, therefore it's true. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI&playnext_from=TL&videos=912RK20y9kA)  ;)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:17:58 am
I'm aiming for 1000 posts and cba to make the next 16 constructive, so I'm gonna spam this thread.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:18:13 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
I'm aiming for 1000 posts and cba to make the next 16 constructive, so I'm gonna spam this thread.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:18:28 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
I'm aiming for 1000 posts and cba to make the next 16 constructive, so I'm gonna spam this thread.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:18:44 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
I'm aiming for 1000 posts and cba to make the next 16 constructive, so I'm gonna spam this thread.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on May 01, 2010, 10:18:50 am
Riveting tale chaps.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:19:17 am
You can only embed 3 quotes within each other :( :cry:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:19:34 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
You can only embed 3 quotes within each other :( :cry:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:19:52 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
You can only embed 3 quotes within each other :( :cry:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on May 01, 2010, 10:20:07 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
You can only embed 3 quotes within each other :( :cry:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:20:31 am
DAMN YOU, BIRD!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:20:46 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
DAMN YOU, BIRD!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:21:01 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
DAMN YOU, BIRD!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on May 01, 2010, 10:21:15 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
DAMN YOU, BIRD!
:lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:22:02 am
-.-
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:22:21 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
-.-
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:22:42 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
-.-
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:23:06 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Quote from: "Altaiair"
-.-
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 01, 2010, 10:23:34 am
Well, I'm off to make a constructive 1000th post!

Ciao!
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tony Bird on May 01, 2010, 10:29:36 am
Quote from: "Altaiair"
Well, I'm off to make a constructive 1000th post!

Ciao!
(http://imgs.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2006/02/15/fd_cover.jpg)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on May 01, 2010, 01:30:06 pm
sooo erm........... i win :?:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Malgudi on May 01, 2010, 01:49:56 pm
nope
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on May 01, 2010, 01:55:03 pm
but why?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 01, 2010, 02:01:38 pm
Quote from: "Tony Bird"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I know... But I still felt I had to defend the film against that shite.
BTW, really funny avatar :D I LOL'd.
Remember, it was in the Daily Mail, therefore it's true. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI&playnext_from=TL&videos=912RK20y9kA)  ;)
Kinda funny :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Tortea on May 05, 2010, 06:19:43 pm
NO I WIN>
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on May 05, 2010, 06:20:47 pm
me can into win?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Steve Steinbeck on May 05, 2010, 07:29:39 pm
Oh goodness is this thread still going?

I win...
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on May 05, 2010, 07:30:17 pm
This thread will never die

/kills thread
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Altaiair on May 05, 2010, 07:36:41 pm
Quote from: "Steve Steinbeck"
Oh goodness is this thread still going?

I win...

I was actually thinkung of saying the same thing when this thread was at the top of the 'Your Posts'
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on May 05, 2010, 07:43:06 pm
This thread will never die
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Malgudi on May 05, 2010, 07:44:49 pm
we wont let it :twisted:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on May 05, 2010, 07:49:28 pm
and therefore it shall live for ever and give me another distraction from revising for my test tomorrow
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill 2 on May 05, 2010, 08:16:15 pm
wut?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 05, 2010, 08:19:43 pm
Quote from: "Saneth Hill 2"
wut?
Wft? Why do you have 2 accounts?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on May 05, 2010, 08:53:12 pm
His first one got banned.
Way to go for secrecy Saneth. 'Saneth Hill 2'
facepalm
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 05, 2010, 10:29:27 pm
Correction: "Facepalming hard".
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Thor Jarglson on May 05, 2010, 11:41:13 pm
I prefer cock palming... hard :ugeek:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 06, 2010, 12:19:46 am
Quote from: "Avlana Kiarunto"
His first one got banned.
Way to go for secrecy Saneth. 'Saneth Hill 2'
facepalm
(http://picasion.com/pic19/0d0a0e42098a53dd3304b43fd9e15941.gif)
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 06, 2010, 01:00:26 am
Nice one, Jake.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 06, 2010, 01:27:10 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Nice one, Jake.
I actually made that
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 06, 2010, 12:06:31 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Nice one, Jake.
I actually made that
Kudos.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill 2 on May 06, 2010, 08:25:53 pm
wut
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 06, 2010, 08:27:55 pm
Quote from: "Saneth Hill 2"
wut
shuddup







Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Saneth Hill 2 on May 06, 2010, 08:28:52 pm
wut
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 06, 2010, 08:42:12 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Saneth Hill 2"
wut
shuddup







Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 07, 2010, 12:25:59 am
Love that spelling, Jake.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 07, 2010, 01:02:28 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
Love that spelling, Jake.
Thank you. It's usually the most effective
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: anarchist13 on May 07, 2010, 01:17:50 am
Pearl - Shire

A Shire of Pearls. Maybe?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 07, 2010, 01:31:48 am
Quote from: "anarchist13"
Pearl - Shire

A Shire of Pearls. Maybe?
No. I made up the name when I was 10 lolz
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 07, 2010, 11:37:21 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "anarchist13"
Pearl - Shire

A Shire of Pearls. Maybe?
No. I made up the name when I was 10 lolz
Cool stuff.
I made up my name just a month ago.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 07, 2010, 08:35:45 pm
8/10

I like the name
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on May 07, 2010, 08:37:16 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
8/10

I like the name
:?  Did you get the threads confused?
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 07, 2010, 08:55:30 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
8/10

I like the name
:?  Did you get the threads confused?
Read the last five posts (this one excluded) again.
It's all very logical.

Thank you, Jake. I think your name sounds really fancy, something I like :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Ryan Bewick on May 07, 2010, 08:56:27 pm
I'll just let you guys roll around in the compliments
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Avlana Kiarunto on May 07, 2010, 09:19:51 pm
Winning
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 07, 2010, 11:20:18 pm
Quote from: "Ryan Bewick"
I'll just let you guys roll around in the compliments
Thanks.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Skillz88 on May 08, 2010, 12:20:58 am
I can win.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 08, 2010, 12:34:46 am
I know you can ... you can at least try :D
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 08, 2010, 05:30:54 am
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I know you can ... you can at least try :D
A mod will win. Trufax
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 08, 2010, 09:12:16 am
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
Quote from: "Loyosi"
I know you can ... you can at least try :D
A mod will win. Trufax
I also suspect this. That a mod will win, I mean.
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 08, 2010, 04:45:42 pm
/me tries to find ways to become a mod
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: The B on May 08, 2010, 04:59:25 pm
:mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :(  :(  :x  :idea:  :o  :evil:  :evil:
 :P  :oops:  :cry:  :arrow:  :|  :?:  :idea:  :x  :lol:
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Darius J Pearlshire on May 08, 2010, 05:37:30 pm
Quote from: "The B"
:mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :|  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :(  :(  :x  :idea:  :o  :evil:  :evil:
 :P  :oops:  :cry:  :arrow:  :|  :?:  :idea:  :x  :lol:
win
Title: Re: Last Post Wins.
Post by: Loyosi on May 08, 2010, 09:01:54 pm
Quote from: "Jake Pearlshire"
/me tries to find ways to become a mod