Author Topic: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration  (Read 3794 times)

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« on: January 20, 2009, 11:30:47 pm »
Let it be here know that at 15:22 of Day 427 of the New World, Taytaz wishes to file a Civil Complaint Lawsuit against private citizen Shadow, and a further lawsuit against the eUK Forum Administration.

Lawsuit 1 - Shadowukcs Defendant
1 Count of Violation of eRepublik Laws (freedom of party)
1 Count of Admin/Moderator abuse and/or misconduct
Breach of Implied Contract - Damages

Lawsuit 2 - Administration of UK forums
1 Count of Incompetence and Neglect resulting in Damages
1 Count of Discrimination

The Plaintiff requests that the HoL nominate a judge for this trial. A reply/motion from the defendant is expected within 48 hrs of this appointment

Taytaz
Pro se

Dishmcds

  • Party - UKRP
  • Posts: 11228
  • Look behind you
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2009, 11:34:01 pm »
Shit, I'll judge. Present your case :/
[size=150]Former 7 time Erepublikan President[/size]

Hermanos

Vettige Swa

  • Posts: 962
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2009, 11:41:09 pm »
Didn't know this was a democracy?
"Super Army Soldiers"

23]

GloriousFailure

  • Posts: 2061
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2009, 11:46:43 pm »
SHOTGUN JURY.
I feed off your tears.

http://www.last.fm/user/Dysphonia

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2009, 11:47:34 pm »
Fine. :roll:

1st Count of Violation of eRepublik Laws
eRepublik is a society simulator based around the norms of the society of the USA. The eRepublik '10 Laws of the New World', which as of yet have not been updated, clearly state that one is free to support any political movement and join any party they wish without fear of prosecution, persecution and/or discrimination. In the thread 'Taytaz - Bob's Party', shadow clearly discriminates against a particular political party, taking it upon himself to refuse a board to a party as he did not like the members. Apart from the fact that Shadow has no right on the forums to decide this (it will feature in the neglect against Administration) he is also blatantly stopping members of a party discussing and engaging in politics.

Admin Abuse/Misconduct
Shadow, on numerous occasions (if your honour wishes the presentation of evidence at this point, then i shall oblige) has locked threads arbitrarily or with little or no reason. Issued warnings with little or no reason, issued warnings without proper notification, made unreasonable demands, deliberately stopped threads he didn't like and discriminated against 2 anonymous individuals on the forums, who, incidentally, are also being discriminated against on the grounds of party.

Breach of Implied Contract
Shadow agreed an implied contract when he became an admin that he would administrate well. The Plaintiff beleives that in not administrating well, Shadow has breached this contract. Evidence shall be presented if charges are allowed. This bad administration caused loss and pain to Taytaz and at least one other private citizen, and caused mental damage, as well as disallowing important forum business to be carried out.

Taytaz vs. Administration

Incompetence and Neglect
The Plaintiff beleives it is the fault of the Administration that Shadow has not been controlled and kept under leash. If proper control had been excersised, many of the aforementioned offences would not have occured.

Discrimination
It is the view of Taytaz that although not directly responsible, the eUK forums administration is responsible for the general feel of the forums. Recently, they have allowed high amounts of discrimination and insults against a certain group of 'spammers.' This is further fuelled by discrimination by at least 2 admins (Nelsaidi and Shadow).

Nemo Mobilis

  • Posts: 505
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2009, 11:48:27 pm »
If you require legal council or representation I'm sure I can muster some kind of skill on this matter.
"No man born with a living soul can be workin' for the clampdown." Joe Strummer

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2009, 11:49:39 pm »
Shadow'll need it!

Nemo Mobilis

  • Posts: 505
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2009, 11:51:26 pm »
If either side needs it I suppose I could make an effort to excercise my rhetorical muscles.
"No man born with a living soul can be workin' for the clampdown." Joe Strummer

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2009, 11:53:53 pm »
I'm Pro Se...

rastari

  • Posts: 5218
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2009, 11:54:37 pm »
bob's party should get it's own forums.
2 boblo's for epic awesomeness 2008 and 2009

Quote from: "malta1990"
Well, I'll call it a victory to Jerry. Well Done! Gap is too large now.

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2009, 11:57:02 pm »
I'm suing for that...
I request that the plaintiff choose 1/2 jury, the defendant choose 1/4 and judge choose 1/4
Also, i request that both cases are tried in the same court, as the evidence and situation are the same, there is no reason to waste court resources

Squiddy

  • Posts: 1222
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2009, 12:59:00 am »
Wha.. we have a court now? I need to keep up better.
Squiddy  

Current: Lord of Atlantis - HoL
Ex: Congressman of the United Kingdom (7), Director of Zycon Industries, Minister of Foreign Affairs (3), Commanding Officer of the RG & Navy, Leader of The Unity Party (3) and Lord.

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2009, 01:03:52 am »
We don't have a court
Well, we do now!

Nemo Mobilis

  • Posts: 505
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2009, 01:45:11 am »
Good God man you're turning us into Americans!
"No man born with a living soul can be workin' for the clampdown." Joe Strummer

Deathtoll32

  • Posts: 988
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2009, 03:02:07 am »
Is this meant to be funny Taytaz? I'm trying to figure out if this is a joke or not....  :shock:
former Prime Minister x1
former UK Congressman x4,
former Minister of Finance x1
Ambassador to eGermany
PCP ★ ☭ ★ Member

Nemo Mobilis

  • Posts: 505
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2009, 03:13:50 am »
I personally think he has a valid case and with the right kind of leg work he could easily make an argument against the admins and Shadow.
"No man born with a living soul can be workin' for the clampdown." Joe Strummer

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2009, 03:17:39 am »
This isn't a joke...

Nemo Mobilis

  • Posts: 505
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2009, 03:29:38 am »
Trial of the new century is what this is. It'll blow Scopes monkey Trial out of the water. so long as we proceed in a fair and organized way I'll say this could be the start of something defining in our cultural history.
"No man born with a living soul can be workin' for the clampdown." Joe Strummer

Taytaz

  • Party - PCP
  • Posts: 1964
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2009, 03:34:48 am »
Cool :D

Nemo Mobilis

  • Posts: 505
Re: Taytaz vs. Shadowukcs and Administration
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2009, 03:39:35 am »
Damn Taytaz why'd you have go and pull a stunt like this, got me thinkin' of Inherit the Wind and how kick ass Clarence Darrow was.
"No man born with a living soul can be workin' for the clampdown." Joe Strummer

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
What precious metal is a currency in erepublik?:
How do you spell 'Frerk'?:
What social MMO is this forum linked to?: